Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lost in Space


cookinwithgas

Recommended Posts

It's a good, almost great, family drama. Kids will like it but there are a lot of adult elements, no one is stupid, there's a lot going on action and story wise to follow, and Dr. Smith is creepy as all get out. Kid who plays Will Robinson is a great actor, in fact they are all good. Mom is hot. on Netflix.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah this was a really good sci-fi show, Smith is my only complaint honestly.      High quality 10 episodes though, better effects than a lot of movies coming out (Justice League, BvS, etc).     I was excited to see Toby Stephens get another role because Black Sails was fantastic.      I think Stranger Things has upped the game on kid actors and we've seen a lot better ones lately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whenever I see Dr Smith all I actually see is Ally Sheedys character from Breakfast Club regressing in space. She's really good at it though, and there is a real attempt to recreate the odd dynamic between Smith, Will and the Robot from the original show with the new character motivations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gotta let go of some science to enjoy it (tar pit) but over all a very watchable series.

 

Molly Parker is great and the way they adjusted the original series is overall very solid.  Its no BSG but its eminently enjoyable.

 

Gotta say, Netflix is really upping their game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just watched the first episode with my family tonight and we really enjoyed it. Nice twist on the original. There were quite a few times when we all felt the events were a bit contrived (my 9-year old son kept going, "C'mon man!" when characters did dumb things). Still, it was visually great and we'll keep tuning in this week. 

As a fan of the original series, I was glad to see this effort. The prior movie had a great cast from top to bottom, but man it fell apart with the story (I hate anything that basically revolves around time travel anymore).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really enjoyed it. All the characters have purpose and the actors are great, especially the young actors. They do a great job. The character I enjoyed the least was Dr. Smith, not sure if it was the actor playing the role or what, just something a little off about it. Overall an excellent show...Robot is outstanding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I must have watched something else or maybe I'm just not that into it but after the first episode I was not impressed. No connection at all to the characters and honestly the little boy annoyed the Hell out of me. I also thought the acting was cringe worthy at times especially from him. I never got into the original Lost in Space so maybe that has something to do with it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think so: I watched every ep as a kid but just to see the props and effects, even then I knew that LIS was a goofy monster show. I thought the boy did a good job acting, more importantly; he and the rest of the kids are really smart and engaged, something most kids on TV are not these days it seems. The boy isn't saving everyone on his own at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Johnny Rockets said:

I tried watching the second episode last night and turned it off 20 mins in. Not sure why it’s not clicking for me. I give up. 

it's not a shock the robot is the most intriguing character. the kids are annoying. the parents know best...so 60's...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Many Panthers fans are already excited about second-round selection Nic Scourton for a variety of reasons including but not limited to: the Panthers needed to recharge the position group, Scourton had a late first-round grade according to many (including the Panthers), and he fit this season's modus operandi of stopping the run now and forever. However, Scourton was seen early on as one of the top-3 EDGE guys in this class but fell due to not having quite the season at Texas A&M as he did prior at Purdue (his sophomore season). It's been revealed since then a few different things that speak to that dip in production... Texas A&M, for one, requires each player on their line to be able to hold two gaps. This also explains why we saw low production across the board from the other two TA&M prospects but were still being heavily touted. Scourton was also said to have bulked up to 280lbs in order to fulfill this role and noticeably suffered from it. He's expected to play this season with Carolina at 255 - 260 which is very different from most situations. In most situations, teams are wanting players to gain 15 - 30. Since Scourton is going to be playing at his Purdue weight, I thought it would make sense to dive more into that tape. Y'all... we might have gotten something special... Let's take a quick peek at the stats before we start drooling over some highlights. First, a summary of the last two seasons for Scourton: Second, the game splits: The first thing that pops up for me is how Scourton's sack numbers were cut in half his senior year. We've already pointed out issues with scheme that impacted the TA&M linemen from racking up numbers, but seeing the game splits it's clear that Scourton didn't exactly feast on inferior competition while at Purdue. He had two two-sack games (vs. Michigan (2023 - 2024 champs), Indiana) and a 10-tackle game (vs. Nebraska). I also see the 2024 games where he went up against two top-10 tackles (Will Campbell from LSU + Armand Membou from Missouri) that I watched leading up to the draft.  For those who just want a summary: Scourton looked elite at Purdue and is going to be rotating in often during his rookie campaign. I originally had him penciled in as the second-string, strong-side edge defender behind Clowney but I wouldn't be surprised to see the team have him and Pat Jones II moving around when they rotate in in order to find where Nic looks best. Here's a highlight reel to replace that Cialias you lost in your recliner tonight:   For those that like to use their own eyes: Below I'll be linking the linking the five games I've mentioned above. If you plan to watch all of them, I highly recommend going in the order listed as that will allow you to see him vs. Campbell and then Membou while dealing with the aforementioned things he dealt with at Texas A&M before seeing him look unstoppable in 2023 when he was allowed to play both at a comfortable weight and in a scheme that didn't require him two cover two gaps nearly every play. vs. Will Campbell (2024) vs. Armand Membou (2024) vs. Nebraska (2023) vs. Michigan (2023)   vs. Indiana (2023)  
    • Yea, i honestly think he had almost as much say as Dan.  One of the main reasons I think that is Eager has said before he was ever with the Panthers, that you trade away picks for a qb and for any other position you do pick swaps, and that's exactly what we did.
    • For a LB that is a long career.  They take a beating.  Shoulders and head.  My favorite LB of All Time--Junior Seau--had a 20-year career--the average career for a STARTING MLB is 5.6 years.  I really think Shaq is done, but if he can play, it does not mean that he should.   Think about Morgan's career--7 seasons.  Luke's career--8 seasons.  Beason played only 93 games over 10 years--only 5 seasons where he played 15 games or more.  The other 5 seasons?  No more than 5 games per.  So basically, the average starting MLB plays 90 games in his career.  Shaq has played 123 games and was pretty injury free until the last 2 seasons (6 games total). 
×
×
  • Create New...