Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Meanwhile, in other sex crime news...


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

are people just digging, looking for poo?

how was this not already an issue

The article actually explain that, and in the process may explain why some other things have slid by.

When the Lions did their background check on Patricia, the criminal aspect of it only searched for convictions, not arrests, indictments, accusations, etc.

Since this never went to trial, it didn't show up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

The article actually explain that, and in the process may explain why some other things have slid by.

When the Lions did their background check on Patricia, the criminal aspect of it only searched for convictions, not arrests, indictments, accusations, etc.

Since this never went to trial, it didn't show up.

Nor should it matter, to be honest. I don't see why the NFL and public at large insist on convicting people of things they were not found guilty in a criminal case. We can all largely agree that our criminal "justice" system is extremely flawed but I honestly don't see why the Lions should not hire Patricia based on a charge in which the victim recanted. It's easy to make an assumption that she was bribed or intimidated into recanting but we also have no idea what the circumstances are at all. 

This is one thing I hate about not just the NFL but modern society. The rush to judgement without any or all of the facts in hand. And the assumption that where there is smoke, there must be fire. Life isn't all black and white, it's mainly grey. Especially when you are dealing with legal or criminal matters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Nor should it matter, to be honest. I don't see why the NFL and public at large insist on convicting people of things they were not found guilty in a criminal case. We can all largely agree that our criminal "justice" system is extremely flawed but I honestly don't see why the Lions should not hire Patricia based on a charge in which the victim recanted. It's easy to make an assumption that she was bribed or intimidated into recanting but we also have no idea what the circumstances are at all. 

This is one thing I hate about not just the NFL but modern society. The rush to judgement without any or all of the facts in hand. And the assumption that where there is smoke, there must be fire. Life isn't all black and white, it's mainly grey. Especially when you are dealing with legal or criminal matters.

They did state that no money changed hands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...