Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kelvin Benjamin - I have thoughts


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

1. It is sad to see friendships go sour, first and foremost. Cam and Kelvin were inseparable here for quite a while. They clearly enjoyed each others company a great deal and a friendship developed. By all accounts that is over, and that is the saddest part. It is only a game, after all.

2. Kelvin has never been particularly mature. Kelvin has never held himself accountability. Kelvin has gone through a lot. The comments made by him are ones we could expect from a college freshman, because basically that is what Kelvin is upstairs. He was never the brightest bulb of the bunch.

3. Cam Newton on the other hand has shown he has grown a great deal since being drafted. He could not have handled this any better. I don't think rookie Cam Newton would have taken the high road. Our guy has grown up before our eyes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, coralreefer_1 said:

Yo...we know you like to get hits and generate discussion...but WHY  must you pimp KB so much? Hes done. Hes gone. Not relevant to our team anymore. For real...dont you have fortnight to play?~~~

 

That sounds pretty weird,,   didn't see anything in the OP to "pimp"  KB  ..   You sure you're a coralreefer ?  float on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

Cam and KB probably had a falling out.

Yeah, something happened we don't know about. Probably never will.

I notice KB hasn't been invited to anything of Cam's over the offseason. No kickball. No workouts. Found that odd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, OceanPanther said:

That sounds pretty weird,,   didn't see anything in the OP to "pimp"  KB  ..   You sure you're a coralreefer ?  float on

check the history bro. Igo has KB and DW on the tip of his.____ today. Why is my question. We are far removed form both players. Neither are relevent. Yet the MFCEO feels a need to start thread about them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, coralreefer_1 said:

huh? why you talking about him? Hes not important but you pimp his name. Why? IN our training camp...why are you stirring up discussion about a has been player that is gone?

KB stirred up the discussion by trashing Cam in the media. Otherwise none of us would be talking about him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, KB_fan said:

KB stirred up the discussion by trashing Cam in the media. Otherwise none of us would be talking about him.

KB is not as member of this team...and i dont see the logic of giving his name this much attention on  OUR forum. He said some poo but we and carolina huddle look like some bitter ass becky's by making thread about it. KB is not thread-worthy/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...