Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CMAC Moves the chains.


Manther

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, saints4lifeagain said:

Yeah, but that #1 though. :shades:

Result of better scheme.  That will hopefully change this year.  Norv shouldn't waste 2 downs shoving Cmac up the middle into a loaded box.  If he does,  we'll all be calling for his and RR's head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Manther said:

Result of better scheme.  That will hopefully change this year.  Norv shouldn't waste 2 downs shoving Cmac up the middle into a loaded box.  If he does,  we'll all be calling for his and RR's head.

That is disrespectful to the skillset that Kamara posseses. He just had one of the better seasons for a RB in history, as far as efficiency. Some is scheme. Plenty is skill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, saints4lifeagain said:

That is disrespectful to the skillset that Kamara posseses. He just had one of the better seasons for a RB in history, as far as efficiency. Some is scheme. Plenty is skill.

This seems like the appropriate thread but are you concerned at his increased workload might lead to the fumble rate that he had in college?

Fumble rate is a stat that translates from college to the pros and is RARELY( hell just about never) improved but Kamara was one of the lone examples of a guy having a better nfl rate than college by a good bit. Part of me thinks that is a direct correlation of him sharing carries out of the backfield. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jumpman910 said:

This seems like the appropriate thread but are you concerned at his increased workload might lead to the fumble rate that he had in college?

Fumble rate is a stat that translates from college to the pros and is RARELY( hell just about never) improved but Kamara was one of the lone examples of a guy having a better nfl rate than college by a good bit. Part of me thinks that is a direct correlation of him sharing carries out of the backfield. 

Not really. I don't have the stats on hand but if I remember correctly he only had one year where he had a bad fumble rate. Nothing I've seen from the way he carries the ball scares me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Peppers90 NC said:

Everyone knows it’s the best QB division but that’s a stealthy RB group too 

Meanwhile the Bucs are over there being the Bucs...I would be so depressed as a Tampa fan right now having to deal with the rest of the division 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Reebis21 said:

Meanwhile the Bucs are over there being the Bucs...I would be so depressed as a Tampa fan right now having to deal with the rest of the division 

 

But the Bucs can upset any team at any moment and has the talent to be a playoff team. They just never put it all together for whatever reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • there seems to be a change or two in his personnel preferences.  For example, the safeties.  Another example:  the smallish NTs are out and 330 is back! 
    • This is a good story--I LOVED his dad as a person and player--I talked to him at an OTA (he was back for his second stint) and he was talking about Moore (the WR from Wake Forest) being so young.  I was with my teenage son and told him, "This is Taylor.  He and I attended the OTAs when you were in Rock Hill as a rookie."  He jokes, "Was he in diapers then?" and laughed.  I imagine Moose III was in diapers when we chatted that day.  So I really would love for this to work out.  However, his stats do not suggest he was anything special in college.
    • I guess there are signs. The combination of the turf toe, hamstring, and knee issues led to questions about his long-term health and affected his draft stock, causing him to fall to the second round.  Here is what I know about a knee injury.  It changes nearly every aspect of your lower body movement.  So the turf toe and hamstring could be related.  It makes him seem injury prone.  I guess the knee was not the most recent injury, so the others could have been a result of favoring the knee. Johnson did not run the 40 at the combine or pro day.  That suggests there is something he feels might drop his value.  So if you downplay the severity of the injury, have a history of possibly related injuries, and refuse to demonstrate (when given multiple opportunities) that you are fully recovered, don't get mad when your stock drops. 
×
×
  • Create New...