Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NOW: Live Panthers Q&A with Nick Carboni from NBC Charlotte


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

-Who's snaps do you see Moore taking?

Wright seemed to be our best WR last week and in camp.  Funchess has been hit or miss.  And Smith who hasnt done anything.

 

-Does the staff have full confidence in the safeties not name Searcy and Adams? Searcy is already in his 2nd injury so this could be a problem going forward.  If the staff doesnt have confidence in them going forward, do you see us possibly making a move for someone after Marty adjusted the cap with Luke's restructure

 

-Washington is polar opposite of Wilks.  Wilks was blitz heavy, while Washington doesnt seem fond to blitzing and all pressure come off DL (which seems right with him being a DL doach) week 1 he blitzed a couple times once resulting in a Shaq sack.  This past week he rarely did and when the DL didnt get pressure, Ryan stayed clean and picked us apart.  Could we see Washington mix some more blitzes in of our Line is struggling to get to the QB again?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tepper has mentioned wanting more usage of analytics in the Panthers future planning and coaching.  Do the Panthers already have the people in place to do that sort of thing or is that a need for the future?  Also, any idea how people Ron Rivera, Marty Hurney, Norv Turner and others feel about this idea?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How would either of you assess the Defensive Line? I think they've been fairly averaging going on two years now. Because we've had to blitz to get the majority of our sacks for two straight years. Also, do you think Ron Rivera's philosophy is outdated in this NFL? Where the most important thing is to stop the run? While the QB is getting the ball out quick and torching our trash secondary? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, ncfan said:

-Who's snaps do you see Moore taking?

Wright seemed to be our best WR last week and in camp.  Funchess has been hit or miss.  And Smith who hasnt done anything.

  

-Does the staff have full confidence in the safeties not name Searcy and Adams? Searcy is already in his 2nd injury so this could be a problem going forward.  If the staff doesnt have confidence in them going forward, do you see us possibly making a move for someone after Marty adjusted the cap with Luke's restructure

 

-Washington is polar opposite of Wilks.  Wilks was blitz heavy, while Washington doesnt seem fond to blitzing and all pressure come off DL (which seems right with him being a DL doach) week 1 he blitzed a couple times once resulting in a Shaq sack.  This past week he rarely did and when the DL didnt get pressure, Ryan stayed clean and picked us apart.  Could we see Washington mix some more blitzes in of our Line is struggling to get to the QB again?

 

-Not sure how many snaps Moore will get (17 in each of first two games) but more touches for sure. He's got just two rush attempt and two targets, obviously one went for a 51 yard score...and showed off precisely why the Panthers drafted him...game-breaking ability after the catch. More Moore is on the horizon.

-Full confidence? Doubt it. They love Colin Jones for his ST works obviously, but this is Rashaan Gaulden's chance to show why he was drafted. They'll both be in the mix at both safety spots if Mike Adams needs a rest. More Gaulden if he can prove trustworthy.

-I expect DLine to get back on track at home, but yes, more blitzing from: Shaq Thompson/Captain Munnerlyn...Jackson if he plays? 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Also, we have some idea about what Norv Turner is like as an OC, but what about Scott Turner as a QB Coach?  How different is he from his predecessor, Ken Dorsey?

There's definitely more of a difference between N. Turner and Shula at OC than there is between S. Turner and Dorsey at QBC. Obviously there's been a bit more precision, and so far, less risk taken from QB1. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I will as soon as you withdraw your fandom from the Patriots. Informative threads are great but all of these estrogen and emotion driven threads you start are ridiculous.
    • Will be there tonight and expect nothing from the Canes. They are soft and won't go after anyone, nor will they respond when, not if, Florida starts bullying them. Not to mention Freddie is in net. I fear this will be an ass-kicking.  
    • Is this not a bit contradictory?  Also surely if any of us are smart enough to evaluate what we're seeing in real time, a former NFL QB can at least manage the same.  Especially considering he's basing his analysis on hours (maybe generous?) of reviewing All-22 footage which he can play back over and over again, focusing each time on different position groups, match-ups, progressions, etc. which is simply impossible for a fan to fully assess in real time.  Unless you're actually at the game, we basically only get the QB/O-line in frame during the broadcast and even in that limited window of the field, there is simply too much happening.  I'm usually broadly focusing on Bryce, maybe peeping the footwork (or lack thereof) and just the overall pocket and whether there is any pressure coming.  I'm not able to watch every individual one-on-one o-line match-up on top of it to see who got beat, who didn't pick up a blitz, which o-lineman didn't shift to help double-team, or whatever else. I think the truth is somewhere in between (as is almost always the case).  Knowing the play call, audible, etc. is pretty important when judging individual performances, which is why we should always take PFF grades with a grain of salt.  But yeah we can also get a pretty good overall sense of how a player is performing just from watching the game on the couch on Sundays.  I still think there's a lot of value in a review video like this.  As long as you have the bare minimum media literacy to take the interesting insights while also acknowledging inherent biases from a video like this (i.e. obviously focusing on the good over the bad).
×
×
  • Create New...