Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Falcons lost both their starting safeties. Buccaneers lost their safety to another dimension. Saints need secondary help. But Panthers signed Eric Reid.


Saca312

Recommended Posts

It's a great day in Panthers history when nearly all of the NFC South needs safety help in any form or way, and somehow we're the only ones to pull the trigger. In fact, given our history of being fine with poor safety play, it's fair to assume we would've been the last to even consider safety help in the division. Let alone whatever "political baggage" he has going on.

Yet here we are. A fantastic good safety coming off a career year in his prime playing for us. Not caring one bit about whatever politics he associates with or how he approaches it. 

Just plain old signing someone who'll make a difference for our defense and elevate everyone's play.

Good job Panthers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This whole thing really has got me thinking. How many of the "Man, I wish we would've signed (insert "troubled" player here), but we never do." was because of JR and not because of Ron and Gettleman/Hurney?  Tepper being here is clearly a breath of fresh air, and you have to assume he played role in all this.  But, I still wonder if Ron is doing this now because he can, or because he knows he's playing to keep his job?  It's probably both.  Either way, I'm stoked and hope this tree bares fruit and we end up locking him up long-term. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DFive said:

This whole thing really has got me thinking. How many of the "Man, I wish we would've signed (insert "troubled" player here), but we never do." was because of JR and not because of Ron and Gettleman/Hurney?  Tepper being here is clearly a breath of fresh air, and you have to assume he played role in all this.  But, I still wonder if Ron is doing this now because he can, or because he knows he's playing to keep his job?  It's probably both.  Either way, I'm stoked and hope this tree bares fruit and we end up locking him up long-term. 

Voth has said that he doesn't expect the approach to players with character or legal issues to change.

Reid can't really be considered a "troubled" player. The controversy around him is political, not criminal or personal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

To be fair to the Falcons (something which I hate being but hey) if you had already lost two safeties to injury, would you consider it a wise move to sign a replacement with a history of concussions? :thinking:

I’d consider it a pretty low risk move to sign someone with the upside Eric Reid has.

Youre really hammering this whole concussion drum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Voth has said that he doesn't expect the approach to players with character or legal issues to change.

Reid can't really be considered a "troubled" player. The controversy around him is political, not criminal or personal.

I didn't mean to imply Reid was troubled, I just used that as a catch all word for any player that was dealing with some issue that was polarizing.  I think we can all agree that Ron plays his best when he is on the hot seat, and even though it hasn't been expressed that he is, I'm sure he knows he needs to prove his worth to the Tepp.  Having Norv is such a blessing because Ron has said that he lets Norv do what he wants which means he doesn't have to stretch himself thin and can focus on other areas, like defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mjligon said:

I’d consider it a pretty low risk move to sign someone with the upside Eric Reid has.

Youre really hammering this whole concussion drum.

When a guy has had enough damage that he was thinking about retiring from a game that pays in millions of dollars in his early twenties, there's cause for concern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DFive said:

I didn't mean to imply Reid was troubled, I just used that as a catch all word for any player that was dealing with some issue that was polarizing.  I think we can all agree that Ron plays his best when he is on the hot seat, and even though it hasn't been expressed that he is, I'm sure he knows he needs to prove his worth to the Tepp.  Having Norv is such a blessing because Ron has said that he lets Norv do what he wants which means he doesn't have to stretch himself thin and can focus on other areas, like defense.

Which, oddly enough, seems to be the weak point on the team this year.

Go figure...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mjligon said:

I’d consider it a pretty low risk move to sign someone with the upside Eric Reid has.

Youre really hammering this whole concussion drum.

To be fair it has to be a concern. I don't know how many he has had but do know he had 3 in 2 seasons and was even considering retirement in 2015 because of them. btw I researched this after @Mr. Scot pointed it out. I hope he can come in and ball out and stay healthy. but just like Luke, it has to be considered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wud35 said:

To be fair it has to be a concern. I don't know how many he has had but do know he had 3 in 2 seasons and was even considering retirement in 2015 because of them. btw I researched this after @Mr. Scot pointed it out. I hope he can come in and ball out and stay healthy. but just like Luke, it has to be considered.

 

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

When a guy has had enough damage that he was thinking about retiring from a game that pays in millions of dollars in his early twenties, there's cause for concern.

I get that, but worst case is he plays 3 quarters for us then suffers another concussion and we have to shut him down for the year. 

Clearly we aren't going to be trading for a safety, so if the worst possible outcome were to indeed play out, then odds are anyone else we were perhaps targeting that is sitting on their couch (ex. Mike Mitchell), will probably still be sitting there if Reid were to get hurt again.

I guess what I'm saying is you can't let injury history prevent you from signing a proven commodity at a position of need during week 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, wud35 said:

To be fair it has to be a concern. I don't know how many he has had but do know he had 3 in 2 seasons and was even considering retirement in 2015 because of them. btw I researched this after @Mr. Scot pointed it out. I hope he can come in and ball out and stay healthy. but just like Luke, it has to be considered.

:eyeroll:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...