Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

For the Fire Rivera Group


DaveThePanther2008

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm not in the "Fire Rivera" group. I'm in what I guess you could call the "Question Rivera" group, meaning that I'm not outright advocating his firing but I think it's legitimate to question whether he can win a championship at this point. His performance the last time we reached the Super Bowl certainly wasn't encouraging in that regard.

That said, the notion that you can't fire a head coach because "there's nothing better out there" is silly. Every good head coach in the league right now was an unknown at some point, and every single season there are good candidates available.

Is it a risk? Of course it's a risk. So is hanging on to a head coach who hasn't put it all together yet. This same logic that's being used now could have been used to hang on to John Fox over a guy who at the time was just someone who'd interviewed with nine different teams and been turned down.

Based on what I'm hearing, those same folks now saying Rivera shouldn't be fired would have pointed to his first two seasons as evidence that firing John Fox was a mistake.

You might wanna think about that for a second.

As to candidates...

Dan Campbell: Assistant Head Coach / TE Coach, Saints

Campbell is a Bill Parcells protege who's received lots of positive buzz for his football knowledge and his coaching ability. One coach stated that it's not a matter of if Campbell becomes a head coach in the NFL, but when (he's been interviewed already).

John DeFilippo: Offensive Coordinator, Vikings

Another name that's already received head coaching interviews, DeFilippo has loads of head coaching buzz. He's gotten lots of credit for helping develop Carson Wentz as well as helping Nick Foles be at his best for last year's Super Bowl. If you want an offensive head coach, this is arguably the top name right now.

James Bettcher: Defensive Coordinator, Giants

For those who prefer defensive coaches (not that I expect there are many of those) Bettcher is one of the hot names out there. He's considered to be a coach on the rise and is said to have a brilliant football mind. Like the first two, he's already received head coaching attention. Me? I'm not as high on this idea as I'd like to see us try an offensive coach for the first time, but he'd be an option.

Dave Toub: Assistant Head Coach / Special Teams Coach, Chiefs

Not sure if you want an offensive coach or a defensive coach? How about a Special Teams coach? Worked out pretty well for the Ravens when they hired John Harbaugh. Toub has been considered by many to be the best special teams coach in the league for quite a while and has recently gotten some head coaching consideration as well. And hey, why not a guy who can see the picture from a slightly different perspective than others?

Jim Schwartz: Defensive Coordinator, Eagles

Jerry Richardson was never a big fan of retreads, and became even less of one after the disaster of George Seifert. David Tepper might not feel the same way, and Schwartz has been talked about as someone who will probably return to theHead Coach role somewhere down the road. Again, this is not one of my favorite ideas as I prefer we go offense, but he's another viable option.

 

Now mind you, there's a lot of season left so before the year is over, other names could emerge as hot candidates. Likewise, these names could wax or wane depending on their performance. Such things are obviously impossible to predict.

What can be said, though: There will be good, viable candidates. To deny that is just silly. As mentioned before, every successful head coach in the league right now was once an unknown. Believing that you can't take a chance on an unknown would have prevented you from hiring guys like Doug Pederson, Mike Tomlin, Sean Payton and Sean McVay.

Thanks Mr. Scot. 

This was what I was aiming at and with the exception of a few post most just beat the dead horse to fire Rivera without naming anyone they would like to see. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm not in the "Fire Rivera" group. I'm in what I guess you could call the "Question Rivera" group, meaning that I'm not outright advocating his firing, but I think it's legitimate to question whether he can won a championship at this point.

That said, the notion that you can't fire a head coach because "there's nothing better out there" is silly. Every good head coach in the league right now was an unknown at some point, and every single season there are good candidates available.

Is it a risk? Of course it's a risk. So is hanging on to a head coach who hasn't put it all together yet. This same logic that's being used now could have been used to hang on to John Fox over a guy who at the time was just someone who'd interviewed with nine different teams and been turned down.

Based on what I'm hearing, those same folks now saying Rivera shouldn't be fired would have pointed to his first two seasons as evidence that firing John Fox was a mistake.

You might wanna think about that for a second.

As to candidates...

Dan Campbell: Assistant Head Coach / TE Coach, Saints

Campbell is a Bill Parcells protege who's received lots of positive buzz for his football knowledge and his coaching ability. One coach stated that it's not a matter of if Campbell becomes a head coach in the NFL, but when (he's been interviewed already).

John DeFilippo: Offensive Coordinator, Vikings

Another name that's already received head coaching interviews, DeFilippo has loads of head coaching buzz. He's gotten lots of credit for helping develop Carson Wentz as well as helping Nick Foles be at his best for last year's Super Bowl. If you want an offensive head coach, this is arguably the top name right now.

James Bettcher: Defensive Coordinator, Giants

For those who prefer defensive coaches (not that I expect there are many of those) Bettcher is one of the hot names out there. He's considered to be a coach on the rise and is said to have a brilliant football mind. Like the first two, he's already received head coaching attention. Me? I'm not as high on this idea as I'd like to see us try an offensive coach for the first time, but he'd be an option.

Dave Toub: Assistant Head Coach / Special Teams Coach, Chiefs

Not sure if you want an offensive coach or a defensive coach? How about a Special Teams coach? Worked out pretty well for the Ravens when they hired John Harbaugh. Toub has been considered by many to be the best special teams coach in the league for quite a while and has recently gotten some head coaching consideration as well. And hey, why not a guy who can see the picture from a slightly different perspective than others?

Jim Schwartz: Defensive Coordinator, Eagles

Jerry Richardson was never a big fan of retreads, and became even less of one after the disaster of George Seifert. David Tepper might not feel the same way, and Schwartz has been talked about as someone who will probably return to theHead Coach role somewhere down the road. Again, this is not one of my favorite ideas as I prefer we go offense, but he's another viable option.

 

Now mind you, there's a lot of season left so before the year is over, other names could emerge as hot candidates. Likewise, these names could wax or wane depending on their performance. Such things are obviously impossible to predict.

What can be said, though: There will be good, viable candidates. To deny that is just silly. As mentioned before, every successful head coach in the league right now was once an unknown. Believing that you can't take a chance on an unknown would have prevented you from hiring guys like Doug Pederson, Mike Tomlin, Sean Payton and Sean McVay.

  And which of those organizations got rid of a successful HC when hiring an unknown coach.  How many teams have gotten rid of a coach who made the playoffs 4 of 5 years. Sort of like firing a GM that did the same. It’s easy to hire a coach coming off an awful stretch. Much different in this case. 

 And thanks for the logical response with names

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Toomers said:

  And which of those organizations got rid of a successful HC when hiring an unknown coach.  How many teams have gotten rid of a coach who made the playoffs 4 of 5 years. Sort of like firing a GM that did the same. It’s easy to hire a coach coming off an awful stretch. Much different in this case. 

It's not unheard of. The most recent example would probably have been the Eagles with Andy Reid. Reid was easily the most successful head Coach in Eagles history, but he never won a Super Bowl. Doug Peterson did it in short order.

Mind you, their initial successor to Reid was a poor choice, but if you asked around I doubt there'd be anybody in the organization (or the fanbase) who woukd say it was a mistake to move on from him. Reid, meanwhile, is so far basically the same coach in Kansas City and he was in Philadelphia.

Another example would be the Bucs. There was plenty of outrage when they fired Tony Dungy, all of which subsided when they won the Super Bowl with Jon Gruden. Did Gruden win in a "perfect storm" situation? Maybe, but it can't be denied that he won.

And while it's a slightly different situation, you could also point to Buffalo back in the 90s. The Bills fired future Panthers GM Bill Polian in the wake of back to back Super Bowl appearances, both losses. Replacement GM John Butler took the team to two more, though with the same result. Still, it shows that parting ways from a successful leader isn't automatically a  sentence to mediocrity.

I've said it before. The real question is how many chances you're willing to give Ron Rivera. Bill Cowher took fifteen years to win a championship. Would seven more years of Rivera to get just a single trophy be acceptable?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

It's not unheard of. The most recent example would probably have been the Eagles with Andy Reid. Mind you, their initial successor to Reid was a poor choice, but if you asked I doubt there'd be anybody in the organization who regrets dumping Reid at this point. Reid, meanwhile, is so far basically the same coach in Kansas City and he was in Philadelphia.

Another example would be the Bucs. There was plenty of outrage when they fired Tony Dungy, all of which subsided when they won the Super Bowl with Jon Gruden. Did Gruden win in a "perfect storm" situation? Maybe, but it can't be denied that he won.

And while it's a slightly different situation, you could also point to Buffalo back in the 90s. The Bills fired future Panthers GM Bill Polian in the wake of back to back Super Bowl appearances, both losses. Replacement GM John Butler took the team to two more, though with the same result. Still, it shows that parting ways from a successful leader isn't automatically a  sentence to mediocrity.

I've said it before. The question is really  how many chances you're willing to give Ron Rivera. Bill Cowher took fifteen years to win a championship. Would seven more years of Rivera be acceptable?

Well, I would use all those examples as  reason not to do it. 

  Reid to Kelly was a disaster. Hiring a guy 3 years later doesn’t make that move better. They hired Peterson after an awful stretch with Kelly. 

 Gruden May have won a SB, but he destroyed that team over time. And getting to play your old team didn’t hurt. They still haven’t recovered.

  And after Polians players started getting old, they fell off. And after one more SB, haven’t won a playoff game since 1995. I don’t call that good. 

   Unless you can find me a better option, he hasn’t warranted this “anyone would be better” stance many have. By the end of the year, things could be totally different. I’m not ready to burn it down after one loss. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Toomers said:

Well, I would use all those examples as  reason not to do it. 

  Reid to Kelly was a disaster. Hiring a guy 3 years later doesn’t make that move better. They hired Peterson after an awful stretch with Kelly. 

 Gruden May have won a SB, but he destroyed that team over time. And getting to play your old team didn’t hurt. They still haven’t recovered.

  And after Polians players started getting old, they fell off. And after one more SB, haven’t won a playoff game since 1995. I don’t call that good. 

   Unless you can find me a better option, he hasn’t warranted this “anyone would be better” stance many have. By the end of the year, things could be totally different. I’m not ready to burn it down after one loss. 

Hiring Chip Kelly was a mistake. Letting go of Andy Reid wasn't.

And if you think firing Ron Rivera is a tough sell, imagine the arguments that it took to justify firing Andy Reid. Reid was the winningest coach in Eagles history, had a stretch where the Eagles were annually in the NFC championship and also had a Super Bowl appearance to his credit.

And yet they didn't win a championship until after they let him go.

Any suggestion that the Eagles would be better off now if they had never let go of Reid is a pretty empty argument. If you could find a single Eagles fan who'd rather have Reid than Doug Pederson, I'd be impressed.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Hiring Chip Kelly was a mistake. Letting go of Andy Reid wasn't.

And if you think firing Ron Rivera is a tough sell, imagine the arguments that it took to justify firing Andy Reid. Reid was the winningest coach in Eagles history, had a stretch where the Eagles were annually in the NFC championship and also had a Super Bowl appearance to his credit.

And yet they didn't win a championship until after they let him go.

Any suggestion that the Eagles would be better off now if they had never let go of Reid is a pretty empty argument. If you could find a single Eagles fan who'd rather have Reid than Doug Pederson, I'd be impressed.

 

So your one example is to hire a disaster and hope we hit on the NEXT guy? That’s quite a reach. When Kelly is the one that’s relevant. Not Pederson. They made a mistake. Getting lucky the next time changes nothing. Pederson wasn’t hirerd to replace a successful coach. He took over for a guy fired mid-season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Yes they are in place.....AFTER THEY INTERVIEW.  Which means Tep would have to make the decision to fire Rivera first. New coach takes over after this season. Jesus christ this isnt rocket science. 

It’s pretty simple... you want Ron gone. Who do you want to replace him? Don’t bring up Tepper, he has nothing to do with this discussion. Who do YOU want coaching the team? It ain’t rocket science 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ron is very good at getting guys to play for him, even when it seems like there’s nothing to play for. He knows defense as much or more than most coaches in the League. 

But he sucks at managing a game, he sucks at player evaluation, he sucks when it comes to putting guys on the field who should be playing vs starters like Kalil.

I just don’t see anyone right now who could come in and do a better job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Toomers said:

So your one example is to hire a disaster and hope we hit on the NEXT guy? That’s quite a reach. When Kelly is the one that’s relevant. Not Pederson. They made a mistake. Getting lucky the next time changes nothing. Pederson wasn’t hirerd to replace a successful coach. He took over for a guy fired mid-season. 

That's a lot like arguing that we shouldn't have moved on from Jake Delhomme to Cam Newton because we had to deal with Jimmy Clausen for a while.

You can't say Pederson doesn't count just because there was someone inbetween. Even with Kelly as the interim, the Eagles are still better off now than if they had kept Reid. I seriously doubt any Eagle fan would dispute that.

But since we don't have any Eagle fans around at the moment, I'll phrase the question to you. No spin, no moving the goalposts, no denying that Doug Pederson doesn't matter. Just a straight yes or no.

Should the Eagles have kept Andy Reid instead of moving on?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

That's a lot like arguing that we shouldn't have moved on from Jake Delhomme to Cam Newton because we had to deal with Jimmy Clausen for a while.

You can't say Pederson doesn't count just because there was someone inbetween. Even with Kelly as the interim, the Eagles are still better off now than if they had kept Reid. I seriously doubt any Eagle fan would dispute that.

But since we don't have any Eagle fans around at the moment, I'll phrase the question to you. No spin, no moving the goalposts, no denying that Doug Pederson doesn't matter. Just a straight yes or no.

Should the Eagles have kept Andy Reid instead of moving on?

 

 Yes. In 2013, the Eagles should have not gotten rid off Andy Reid to hire Chip Kelly. 

  Using your logic, you can justify getting rid of any coach, eventually. Sooner or later, some other coach will do well too. 

Now, your turn. Do you think the chances we improve if we fire Rivera are greater than the chances we get worse? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we miss out on Freeling or Lomu, I don't think we take a serious stab at LT this draft. We might take a RT that they think could project to the other side in the mid rounds, but overall, it's a bandage and won't fix the issue if Ickey doesn't return to form form the injury I've mocked it over and and over, it's these two guys or we should pass on LT altogether.   It's a great draft if you need a RT, super deep, but starting caliber LTs are very thin this year.
    • Greetings Huddlers.  Here is my annual analysis of the offense pre-draft in my attempt to predict and understand moves made draft weekend, which is upon us!  I analyze my views on each position and might suggest why I think the Panthers will do what they will do.  This is not my opinion (but there is some bias in it) but more of an educated guess based on the little we know. Quarterback: Gonna start with a conspiracy theory—probably nothing to discuss. It seems that we are going with Bryce, but there was a somewhat interesting statement made about Bryce’s contract.  Morgan (I believe) stated that they would look into Bryce’s contract after the draft.  That probably means that he is busy, but I found it interesting that Draft Kings shows the Panthers as the sixth, “most likely” team to draft Ty Simpson, based on betting lines.  Acquiring Kenny Pickett and moving Andy Dalton to Philly creates another dynamic that could signal some draft day (or post-draft day) drama.  Hurts situation in Philly might have necessitated the Dalton move (again, nothing much more than speculation), but the Panthers taking a younger, former first rounder (I know) could possibly signal a QB competition–depending on what we do draft day.  It seems to me that they are hoping to bring in a UDFA, based on visits.  This is not to say that Bryce is stagnant.  He has improved, and with weapons and a fortress in front of him, he could be better.  I never understood how a QB of his ilk would not have a stud receiving TE and a stud Z WR–he has had neither. Heck, if you cover TMAC like you should with man under and S over the top, you can play zone vs. whoever is playing Z (XL).  So maybe they know something we do not; based on TV coverage, it is hard to see what Bryce sees–how open are his receivers?  They know their jobs are riding on Bryce. In my view, the contract should not be fully guaranteed–the devil will be in the details.    Running Back:  The Panthers were right to let Dowdle walk.  Two RBs on expensive contracts with Brooks possibly emerging as a third option is fiscally irresponsible.   In my view, you make you RBs better with better OL play.  Yes, there are players like CMC etc, but Dowdle peaked here, in terms of historical data that shows RBs peak and start rapidly declining between ages 27 and 28.  Chuba is 26, fwiw, and a tremendous locker room leader. I get it. With Brooks, Etienne, and Dillon behind him, we have a pretty full RB room.  This suggests that they feel good about Brooks.   Tight End:  Personally, I think this draft has some potential at the TE position, and I am not sure that the Panthers will address both Z WR and TE–but I feel they will address one of them.  In my view, I would focus on the Z and give TE another year.  Reason?  Evans showed some promise and will enter year 2.  Sanders has been a bit of a disappointment, but he has potential as well (year 3).  Tremble has been tremendous as a blocker and is actually catching a few passes.  Sadiq would be nice, and there are some solid TE options in this draft, but I am afraid we’d be getting more of the same.  If you draft players on day 3, like all of our TEs, it seems that you need to develop them before casting them aside.   Center:  We are probably more respectable at the C position for 2026 than people realize.  Fortner is basically the equivalent of Cade Mays at a third of the price.  They are about the same age (27 and 26).  Luke Fortner is an center for the Carolina Panthers who earned a 66.5 overall PFF grade in the 2025 season, 18th among 40 qualified centers. He played 678 offensive snaps on the season. Fortner’s  PFF pass-blocking grade of 72.5 ranked 7th among 40 qualified centers in 2025. His run-blocking grade of 65.3 ranked 19th at the position.          Compare that to Mays, who was 24th among 40 qualified centers. He played 726 offensive snaps on the season.  His PFF pass-blocking grade of 69.4 ranked 13th among 40 qualified centers. His run-blocking grade of 58.5 ranked 33rd at the position.  Fortner is actually an upgrade, based on these numbers. To me, the mystery here is Nick Samac, who was originally drafted by the Ravens. The Panthers protected his roster spot last season, something I thought was interesting.  Word on the street is that they like him, but how much?  Samac is a great run blocker for a 24-year old; his issues are in pass protection.  We want to focus on the run, but with a dwarf at QB, we need the middle of the OL to hold up.  If Samac learns to widen his base and get good leverage, we could have a starting-caliber center on our hands at some point.  Is Samac why we let Mays walk?  Is Samac the reason Fortner only got a one-year deal?   Maybe, just maybe, Center is not a huge need.  I think we draft one, but maybe not as soon as you might think.     Guard:  Hunt and Lewis are solid—and expensive–and knocking on the door of 30.  Hunt was injured for most of 2025, but Lewis was very solid.  Lewis: His PFF pass-blocking grade of 79.7 ranked 3rd among 81 qualified offensive guards. His run-blocking grade of 73.1 ranked 14th at the position. Contractually, there is not much we can do if we wanted to move on.  Hunt will count $24m against the cap; Lewis about $17m.  However, in 2027, when both are turning 31, we could save $19m (of $24m) on Hunt’s deal if we cut him post June 1 and $13m of Lewis’ deal if we cut him at any time.  At the same time, Bryce’s big money will kick in, making these moves nearly inevitable. Do not be surprised to see us draft a G this year.  Zavala sucked when he played, and you can expect two 30-year old guards to get banged up. Saahdiq is probably their top reserve guard, and he has been a bust since being drafted in round 4 by Washington.  We need someone for depth in 2026 and possibly to start in 2027.   Tackle:  Ekwonu in 2025: earned a 69.9 overall PFF grade in the 2025 season, 36th among 89 qualified offensive tackles. He played 942 offensive snaps on the season.  He was below average as a pass blocker in 2025 and above average as a run blocker.  (Sure sounds like a Guard BEFORE the injury).He allowed 40 total pressures in pass protection. That total included 5 sacks and 6 hits allowed to opposing pass rushers. He was flagged for 7 penalties over the course of the season.  These numbers are far from elite. However, since he needs the better part of a year to recover–and since we might need 2 guards in 2027, why not give him an incentive-laden GUARD contract and move him to his natural position?  I think I do that, realizing that he can play outside in a pinch (see Wharton, Travelle).  So when I consider Ickey’s return, considering his contract etc. I do not see a return to OT–guard is his position now.   Walker, in my view, was the steal of free agency for the Panthers.  No, he is not an all-star, but he can play at a level I will call “average” for the LT position. In 2025 for the Packers, he earned a 64.6 overall PFF grade, 52nd among 89 qualified offensive tackles (slightly below average). He played 986 offensive snaps on the season.His PFF pass-blocking grade of 70.0 ranked 42nd among 89 qualified offensive tackles (average). His run-blocking grade of 55.4 ranked 71st at the position (well below average). He allowed 34 total pressures in pass protection. That total included 5 sacks and 1 hits allowed to opposing pass rushers. He was flagged for 9 penalties over the course of the season (very similar to Icky–better in pass pro, much worse in run blocking).  Moton: Our best offensive lineman by far. Moton earned a 80.5 overall PFF grade in the 2025 season, 15th among 89 qualified offensive tackles (above average). He played 901 offensive snaps on the season. His PFF pass-blocking grade of 76.5 ranked 21st among 89 qualified offensive tackles. His run-blocking grade of 81.9 ranked 12th at the position (Moton is elite). He allowed 22 total pressures in pass protection. That total included 3 sacks and 4 hits allowed to opposing pass rushers. He was flagged for 5 penalties over the course of the season.  Moton and trainers have been monitoring a “Chronic” knee condition (common in older OL). Moton feels that he can keep playing.  In my view, he can be cut after 2026 (post june 1) and the team would save $19m of his contract at age 33.  Depending how he plays and holds up in 2026, that is a real possibility.   Stone Forsythe: Sounds like a comic book detective.   Wide Receiver:   The Panthers are met with 105 position players in some way (from visits to pro day/combine meetings etc) 2026 Panthers Draft Visits Tracker”There are six potential first round picks on the list–four of them are wide receivers—KC Concepcion, Omar Cooper Jr., Denzel Boston, and Jordan Tyson (personal workout). Concepcion is from Charlotte, so the Panthers almost had to host him for a visit. It’d be an interesting allocation of resources to use three straight first-round picks on wide receivers, especially when an undrafted free agent has already usurped one of those first-round picks. The visits from projected Day 2 players are all over the map. Again, multiple wide receivers appear.  Of the 105 position players the Panthers met with, 15 were Wide Receivers.  They are doing their homework at Wide receiver.   Tetairoa McMillan earned a 78.7 overall PFF grade in the 2025 season, 21st among 81 qualified wide receivers. His PFF receiving grade of 78.7 ranked 23rd among 81 qualified wide receivers (well above average). He hauled in 70 receptions on 120 targets for 1,014 receiving yards and 7 touchdowns. McMillan averaged 14.5 yards per reception on the season.  He generated 271 yards after the catch, demonstrating his ability to create with the ball in his hands. He was charged with 7 drops on the year (clean that up, TMac). His average depth of target was 12.3 yards, reflecting his role in the passing attack.  TMac is a strong X WR.  Jalen Coker: Before the last 7 games of 2025 (beginning Nov 16, 2025), Coker had 66 yards on 7 catches.  After that date, Coker exploded during the final 8 games (including the playoff game) for 462 yards in 35 catches. We need him healthy but he is a stud folks.  The best hands on the team–I would go as far as to say Ricky Proehl hands.  Yep.   Xavier Legette earned a 52.6 overall PFF grade in the 2025 season, 79th among 81 qualified wide receivers (rock bottom). His PFF receiving grade of 54.7 ranked 78th among 81 qualified wide receivers.(still on the bottom) He hauled in 35 receptions on 59 targets for 363 receiving yards and 3 touchdowns. Legette averaged 10.4 yards per reception on the season.  He generated 74 yards after the catch, demonstrating his ability to create with the ball in his hands. He was charged with 1 drop (improvement). His average depth of target was 11.0 yards, reflecting his role in the passing attack.  His contract is not steep (under $4m) and it is fully guaranteed. Financially, it makes no sense to cut him based on the fact that we knew he was raw when we drafted him. The improvement in drops suggests that he is coachable, but his comments during pressers give me anxiety about his mental state. Let him compete. John Metchie III:  Maybe he needed another season with another team–a reunification with Bryce?  Not sure two drowning swimmers can pull each other back into the boat. At any rate, it is worth a shot. Low Risk, high reward?   John Metchie III is a wide receiver for the Carolina Panthers who earned a 57.6 overall PFF grade in the 2025 season, 74th among 81 qualified wide receivers. His PFF receiving grade of 58.7 ranked 73rd among 81 qualified wide receivers.He hauled in 33 receptions on 48 targets for 274 receiving yards and 2 touchdowns. Metchie III averaged 8.3 yards per reception on the season.  He generated 144 yards after the catch, demonstrating his ability to create with the ball in his hands. He was charged with 4 drops on the year. His average depth of target was 5.5 yards, reflecting his role in the passing attack. Jimmy Horn:  They really do not throw it downfield to Horn much—just a reverse, screen guy.  I think there could be more.  He caught 11 passes of 13 targets (1 drop) in 2025 for 120 yards.  In comparison, fwiw, Steve Smith caught 10 passes (20 targets) for 154 yards during his rookie season.  Give him some time. Brycen Tremayne: Tremayne is one of those UDFAs that you root for.  A big (6’4” 212) WR with football intelligence (Stanford), Tremayne quietly had 160 yards in 2025 (14 catches/17 targets).  Not a super star, but an active special team player who can make plays on offense.   Overview:  If I am the Panthers, I forget about Ickey and Moton beyond 2026 as tackles. I pencil in Ickey at Guard and hope that he heals. Having said that, it is quite possible that our entire OL is different by 2027.  Hunt and Lewis will be 31 and their contracts will be ending (cuttable).  Our current starting center (Fortner) will be a free agent.  Our current starting LT will be a free agent.  Yikes. To make matters worse, Bryce’s expected contract (hard to say this) will make free agency an unlikely source for talent.  We need to start building the next room now. Does that mean first rounders?  Of course not.  Most of the guys in the first round this year would not have been last year–so grab kids that are risers “but not there yet.”  This draft is good at the bottom for OL talent–just not great at the top.  Take a few days 2-3.  Not ideal, but you can’t force it.  I think we kept Tremayne (WR) as a key backup, but he is a good fourth WR who can move inside and create mismatches, much like a pass-catching TE–so I do not expect TE in this draft unless we dive in early–Sadiq.  Developing your young talent is a better risk, imo.  Sanders has not scratched his potential and Evans showed some signs.  Tremble is getting better. If they think XL is about to turn the corner as the Z WR, they might go TE, but XL is, according to PFF, one of the worst WRs in the league.  Coker? On an opposite trajectory.  We need a Z WR more than we need a TE, so if we focus on needs on defense (S, LB, DE) and the offense (WR, OL) I am not seeing the luxury of adding a TE to play before our developmental players can reach their potential.  We really have no established depth at WR behind TMac and Coker, so expect a Z in the draft–early. I think they are going with Chuba, Brooks, Eteinne, and Dillon for now at RB.  QB?  It sure looks as though the are going to grab a UDFA to be the emergency QB.  One will fall out of the draft that has the potential to stick in the NFL–which is why we brought them in for visits–we want that team to be us.  I think this is the best evidence that we are “all in” on Bryce.   Predictions:   Round 1:  WR: I still think this is the biggest possibility for round 1 if you go by position.  A rare talent from Oregon (TE or S) could be the pick if the WRs don’t fall, and the same can be said for OL or DL.  This draft is very challenging, but the tea leaves say WR is an area they researched heavily.  By the way, they LOVE Texas Tech LB Rodriquez.  Met with him 3 times.  Do not be surprised…he is my darkhorse.   The betting lines, however, provide some interesting perspectives,and the player’s expected availability is factored in, so take with a grain of salt:   (Panther Wire) For those of you who want an OT (I am not going to cry if we land a Proctor, for example–I totally get it), Morgan said this (in relation to Canales’ comments at the league meeting about the first rounder being an immediate starter):  “"I understand what Coach is saying in terms of—obviously, you want your first-round pick to be able to come in and contribute immediately. So, yeah, I'm kinda with him on that," Morgan stated when asked of Canales' comments. "You want your first-round pick to play, but there's different scenarios to where maybe it takes a guy a little longer to develop, and he may not contribute right away. With some of the picks at different positions, it may take a little longer for those guys to develop, for sure." That could apply to CB or OT, in my opinion.   Round 2: This will probably be defense if they draft WR in round 1, but if they do not, expect the WR in round 2.  I do not see a WR after round 2 helping much–it would be better to go with the TE if that is the case.  I am of the mindset that XL will not emerge to reach his potential, a major indicator of my thinking on this. This will be a LB--they want Rodriguez but the will draft Hill or Golday if WR is taken in round 1. Round 3:  I see DL, S, and TE in my crystal football.  However, my night visions show us taking a TE--Max Klare from Ohio State. I see DE as perhaps our biggest need--but not many share my view--we never replaced Robinson. (This is tough to do) Day 3:  Expect OL OL and maybe DL. Our OL is in its last season together.  A total overhaul is ahead. Keep an eye on Jude Bowry and Austin Barber.  Mark my words!!   So that is it for the offense.  I hope you enjoyed this–by doing this, it helps me understand the currents and the nuances of the draft–I enjoy it more–so this is for me, shared with you.  I will take a look at D and try to share by Tuesday. If you appreciate this, see the link pinned in Huddle and help out if you can- Newborn Twin Granddaughters 
    • That I will agree with. Their dad is a clown show and a half. 🤦‍♂️
×
×
  • Create New...