Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Late Games Thread


Hoenheim

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Hoenheim said:

that play led directly to  a Patriots TD . Probably back breaking 

and now the pats are up 2 scores after that fumble by Aaron Jones. Game changing play that lost them the game straight up

NFL Games are all about momentum and that fumble erased Green Bays momentum 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Why? It's best for us for GB to get buried. We won't see the Pats unless it's the SB. I want no part of Rodgers with our defense if they get hot and make a run.

GB is horseshit and has no chance with or without Rodgers. fug the Pats and Brady, unless it's a division rival against them or another NFC team that directly affects us then I hope they lose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, t96 said:

GB is horseshit and has no chance with or without Rodgers. fug the Pats and Brady, unless it's a division rival against them or another NFC team that directly affects us then I hope they lose.

The Pats are going to win their shitty division like always. It's inevitable. The only way we face them is in the SB. I'll take burying Aaron Rodgers in the meantime. Not even a debate in my mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The Pats are going to win their shitty division like always. It's inevitable. The only way we face them is in the SB. I'll take burying Aaron Rodgers in the meantime. Not even a debate in my mind.

I think the person who is most likely to get "buried" in Green Bay is Mike McCarthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeah, I can get a little of that.  But that's not what he is posting in his argument just now though.   He said people wouldn't even concede to the literal ability to do it when pressed on the literal ability.  I have never seen that.  He maintains it exists somewhere.  I mean, using anomaly games to make arguments about players just isn't the way.   There wasn't a defender within 10 yards of our guys on 2 of those 3 throws Sunday.  No one within 5 on the 3rd.   That's not Bryce Young answering questions about his play downfield..  That's Bryce Young taking advantage of coverage busts by a bad D.  Which hey, that's part of the game too.  Recognition and seeing the field.   It can't totally be dismissed.   That's still good play.  You want your QBs to make those plays.  But it's not getting into the long standing critique of BY IMO.   
    • Deserved, I wouldn’t use that word. Asked for? For sure. Am I upset over it? No.  People forget that AT was throwing his helmet in frustration last season over his QB’s ineptitude. The same QB was pretty inept to start this year, no guarantee AT would have helped him in those games any more than he did last year.  Just sayin.  And Dan doing him a solid probably did not go unnoticed by players around the league. I think it increases his rep with potential FAs. It sure can’t hurt it. 
    • You think that was the fault of the guy that was lighting it up or maybe the bums around him? Funnily enough, those bums are still being bums in his absence. Who would have thought!
×
×
  • Create New...