Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Considering a change of job


hepcat

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, hepcat said:

I am getting married in Feb. No kids yet. The income level of Job 1 would make that a more realistic possibility. Job 2 barely pays all my bills.

There's your answer. My marriage survived a year of me being away because we didn't have money problems. And I left with a 36 hour notice

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, hepcat said:

I am getting married in Feb. No kids yet. The income level of Job 1 would make that a more realistic possibility. Job 2 barely pays all my bills.

Barely paying your bills and getting married soon do not go hand in hand.

Go with the higher pay, and do something with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/10/2018 at 8:27 AM, thefuzz said:

Barely paying your bills and getting married soon do not go hand in hand.

Go with the higher pay, and do something with it.

Yup, that's pretty much the thinking here. Buying a house and starting a family would be almost impossible with the lower salary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/10/2018 at 9:27 AM, thefuzz said:

Barely paying your bills and getting married soon do not go hand in hand.

Go with the higher pay, and do something with it.

Not so fast...

Is your future wife bringing any income to the marriage? If not, then you have little choice but Job 1.

But be realistic and honest not only with yourself, but your wife-to-be. You have to know that while you're paying the bills and maybe saving a few bucks here and there, the reality is you don't sound like you'll be happy a few years down to road. A job is only a means to an end- it does not define who you are unless you allow it or want it to. If you can wash your hands of the job everyday by the time you get home and not have to deal with it after hours, then by all means take it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Job 1 doesn't sound like a situation that would last long. Job 2 sounds a lot more secure.

And in regards to the money, learn to live on less. Adjust your lifestyle to fit the income for the job you'd like better. Chasing after more money is just like chasing after happiness... you'll never be satisfied with what you have which means you will have a dis-satisfied life. 

Choose the life and the job that satisfies you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rayzor said:

Job 1 doesn't sound like a situation that would last long. Job 2 sounds a lot more secure.

And in regards to the money, learn to live on less. Adjust your lifestyle to fit the income for the job you'd like better. Chasing after more money is just like chasing after happiness... you'll never be satisfied with what you have which means you will have a dis-satisfied life. 

Choose the life and the job that satisfies you.

Job 1 is definitely more a roll of the dice for long term job security than Job 2. I could have Job 2 for a long time in some capacity, but my salary would always be low. It's almost impossible to get a big raise not only staying in the same place but also working for a public state entity. The Job 2 salary is low enough where we might need to have a roommate should we buy a house. Job 1 eliminates that need and then some. Job 1 also offers a huge chance to grow, so the gamble might pay off. If the company continues to expand, my job role expands. I'm joining a small team responsible for company wide support, so if they keep expanding, I'd essentially be getting in on the ground floor of what could be a long term job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No question Job 1 IMHO.

One day a week off? Yes please. Especially with you being a musician. That gives you a whole day, every week, to create or do whatever the F you want. Medical or other appointments? EZPZ scheduling.

More money, yes plz.

Boring? Who cares? You get paid and a 4 day workweek for being bored.

It shouldn't be a question. The only negatives I see (highway traffic, less security) are far outweighed by the positives.

As a bonus, let Job #2 know why you're declining, but that you would hope they would either make a comparable offer to Job #1 or keep your info on file should there be other opportunities in the future. That way, maybe you put a doorstop in that door to keep it from closing completely should you change your mind down the road.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Bronn said:

No question Job 1 IMHO.

One day a week off? Yes please. Especially with you being a musician. That gives you a whole day, every week, to create or do whatever the F you want. Medical or other appointments? EZPZ scheduling.

More money, yes plz.

Boring? Who cares? You get paid and a 4 day workweek for being bored.

It shouldn't be a question. The only negatives I see (highway traffic, less security) are far outweighed by the positives.

As a bonus, let Job #2 know why you're declining, but that you would hope they would either make a comparable offer to Job #1 or keep your info on file should there be other opportunities in the future. That way, maybe you put a doorstop in that door to keep it from closing completely should you change your mind down the road.

Well, it's not exactly a 4 day work week, but it's "strongly encouraged" to work 1 day from home per week, per management policy. I would probably have to do some actual work from home, but obviously being at home I'm not going to be as productive as if I were in the office and could work in my pajamas.

While Job 1 might start off as a little boring, it does offer a big chance to ramp up if the company continues growing. It's one of those roles that is speculative based on their growth projections and new offices popping up around the country (currently they have three remote locations I'd be supporting), which increases the current risk, but if they meet their growth forecast, it should be an important role. Plus the current guy they have on the team doing this job is older and not healthy.

Job 2 is very much it is what it is, it will probably stay that way for awhile with little mobility opportunities, at least early on. I know others who have worked for Job 2 and they've left for greener pastures after a few years usually. The salary is just not competitive with working for a private company...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Update - I started Job 1 in early Dec and have been working for about a month. So far I like the job. A lot more responsibility and challenges than my old job, but I'm feeling confident as I ramp up. I think it was a good decision. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Update - I started Job 1 in early Dec and have been working for about a month. So far I like the job. A lot more responsibility and challenges than my old job, but I'm feeling confident as I ramp up. I think it was a good decision. 

Responsibility and Challenges are awesome.  Good luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah and I am doubtful he can offer that consistently. I don’t have many years left at my age and in my view we have wasted two and this whole exercise with him was always a three year minimum.  I am out on that with a guy I don’t believe in, and never believed in, it has sucked. To me it is a costly detour off the right track. Years.    But I am not so rigid that I can’t see excellence. He needs to display it though, consistently before I change my outlook.  
    • No, when I said rage, I meant rage, which only applies to certain fans on this board. Your timeline of trying to assess whether he is the future or not is really tied to the discussions surrounding his second contract. If this team is going to commit to some monster contract while he has shown nothing but glimpses of brilliance would be deservedly worrisome, so the clock is genuinely ticking for him to settle into something resembling his final form. Perhaps a best case scenario is that he plays well, the team succeeds, but he does so with a more limited role that makes the rest of the league view him as a game manager, and his second contract value reflects that. Then he continues to improve and becomes a bargain comparatively while not handicapping the team around him, and we enter an era of consistent championship competitiveness that the fanbase has craved for decades and has never really experienced before. But that requires many, many things to go right and for Bryce himself to facilitate that if he ends up being the quarterback of the future.
    • Exactly. And the flame throwers as well, get location benefits from not going all out. But they have it in reserve.  Not sure how much Greg had but he was an artist.  There was a YouTube I came across last year or maybe even 2023 and I don’t how to even find now but it had two NFL QBs I want say one was Carr from the Raiders but I don’t really remember  The point of it is they stood side by side throwing identical distances to identical targets. Radar gun was used.  They threw the normal effort (not all out) and it was measured etc. Then they were asked to throw their ‘fastball’. They were missing and most often they were missing high. It demonstrated the same principle.    edit: and applying that to arm strength, give me the guy that doesn’t need max effort to have good velocity. The margins are so narrow with less velocity in tne NFL the defenders can Close on it and this is a league where they value down to the 100th of a second level. It is that tight 
×
×
  • Create New...