Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Job More Attractive Than Packers - CBS Sports

Varking

By Varking,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

jtm Rising Star

jtm

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, KillaCamNewton said:

Lockett and Baldwin are lightyears ahead of Samuel and Moore at this point in their careers. When you compare them to Torrey and Funchess this comparison is even dumber

I don't agree with this at all plus Seattle doesn't have CMC or Olsen.  If you are going to argue that Cam has better stats than Wilson, you'll lose this argument every single time.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Icege Grand Master

Icege

Posted
Posted

Makes sense to me.

35yr old Rodgers with a ton of money dumped into him, 32yr old Clay Matthews, logjam of mediocrity at RB, Byron Bell at RG,  vs. 29yr old Cam, 27yr old Luke Kuechly, Christian McCaffrey at RB, and Matt Kalil that you can spend $2M in addition to his already $12M salary next season to cut him?

I mean... I'd take it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Paintballr Newbie

Paintballr

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Mikey818 said:

What’s holding him back? First it was Shula so we got Norv then lack of weapons and we have an all world rb and fast wideouts  now it’s ron. So under what scenario would we win with cam?

He is having statically his best season ever. Even more than the year he won MVP

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mikey818 Newbie

Mikey818

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Paintballr said:

He is having statically his best season ever. Even more than the year he won MVP

Yes good completion percentage mainly due to cmc catching every ball that hits his hands. We do have red zone and end of games issues both passing and kicking. It’s not all on Cam 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CPF4LIFE Grand Master

CPF4LIFE

Posted
Posted
49 minutes ago, Mikey818 said:

Yes good completion percentage mainly due to cmc catching every ball that hits his hands. We do have red zone and end of games issues both passing and kicking. It’s not all on Cam 

LMAOOOOO.....so is he supposed to drop them then?? What does this even mean?  Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mikey818 Newbie

Mikey818

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

LMAOOOOO.....so is he supposed to drop them then?? What does this even mean?  Lol

It’s my way of saying that much of cams improved completion percent is due to having a back like cmc. I doubt his completion percent would be so good if we didn’t have cmc 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CPF4LIFE Grand Master

CPF4LIFE

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, KillaCamNewton said:

hIS coMPLetIOn pERcenTAge iS onLY gOOd becAUSE hE hitS recEIVers in THEir HaNDS

Seriously, there is so man directions i can go with in response to that statement. I will just say its actually nice cam has a receiver that catches everything for change. Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CPF4LIFE Grand Master

CPF4LIFE

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Mikey818 said:

It’s my way of saying that much of cams improved completion percent is due to having a back like cmc. I doubt his completion percent would be so good if we didn’t have cmc 

So basically the front office finally did a good thing and gave Cam a safety blanket to rely on when the receivers cant get open because you know...they have never been to good that. Right?

 Most good qbs have one you know.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mikey818 Newbie

Mikey818

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

So basically the front office finally did a good thing and gave Cam a safety blanket to rely on when the receivers cant get open because you know...they have never been to good that. Right?

 Most good qbs have one you know.

 

Yes Batman has his robin so We really should be winning more lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • ForJimmy
      The Bryce Trade is Finally Complete. Who Won the Trade? Panthers vs Bears

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Loyalty4Life
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By Loyalty4Life · Posted

      Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...