Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Looking towards the draft.


kungfoodude

Recommended Posts

Sitting at 6-7 and given our remaining schedule, we project to pick somewhere in the 10-18 range. What positions and players are you interested in?

 

For me, my early wish list guys would be Nick Bosa(DE), Clelin Ferrell(DE), Quinnen Williams(DE/DT), Jawaan Taylor(OT), Ed Oliver(DE/DT), Josh Allen(DE/OLB), Deandre Baker(CB), Jonah Williams(OT), Cody Ford(OG), Deionte Thompson(S), Zach Allen(DE). As I look at the class of prospects available, we should be able to get some help on the DL. The OL class looks a little weak but with most of our needs being on the interior(assuming we are able to resign Williams), we could be okay. 

I also like the chances of us being able to pick up a better possession receiver to replace Funchess. Safety looks a little weak, so we might have to look at free agency. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Sitting at 6-7 and given our remaining schedule, we project to pick somewhere in the 10-18 range. What positions and players are you interested in?

 

For me, my early wish list guys would be Nick Bosa(DE), Clelin Ferrell(DE), Quinnen Williams(DE/DT), Jawaan Taylor(OT), Ed Oliver(DE/DT), Josh Allen(DE/OLB), Deandre Baker(CB), Jonah Williams(OT), Cody Ford(OG), Deionte Thompson(S), Zach Allen(DE). As I look at the class of prospects available, we should be able to get some help on the DL. The OL class looks a little weak but with most of our needs being on the interior(assuming we are able to resign Williams), we could be okay. 

I also like the chances of us being able to pick up a better possession receiver to replace Funchess. Safety looks a little weak, so we might have to look at free agency. 
 

I think we have to draft DE early.  Reason?  We don't have 2 years to develop a DE--we need a game-ready DE.  From your list, I see  Allen being there (Bosa and Ferrell will go 1 and 2, IMO)   M. Sweat is a real possibility---However, the chips could fall where we have to go DE in round 2--Jaylon Ferguson or Chase Winovich are solid choices. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I think we have to draft DE early.  Reason?  We don't have 2 years to develop a DE--we need a game-ready DE.  From your list, I see  Allen being there (Bosa and Ferrell will go 1 and 2, IMO)   M. Sweat is a real possibility---However, the chips could fall where we have to go DE in round 2--Jaylon Ferguson or Chase Winovich are solid choices. 

I could easily see us going DE in the first two rounds if the picks fall that way. A lot will depend on who our GM and HC is, of course. At the bare minimum we need to get one starting DE out of this draft. Ferrell could fall into that 10-18 range. I don't THINK he ends up testing as an elite athlete in the workouts and maybe he gets a slight downgrade as a result(similar to Allen). For us, we just need a productive player to build on while we revamp that DL. We can do rental FA signings to fill in gaps but it is time to focus on getting that unit set up for the next decade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree op, I think we can grab a upper echelon de in fa if and only if this staff makes it a priority. Once that is done, dt is a need, kk short problems he has in college are starting to show and idk if Poe is any good or if it’s just how abismal the play calling and d coordinator has been. Personally if for any reason bosa slides, I’m all for trading up and grabbing him, a tough cut or trade but I’d consider both for short, grab a couple of run stuffing dt, pair Reid with a true fs who excels in pass defense. And a couple of other moves in the secondary will shore up the defense 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Nice-Carolina-Chuck said:

I really feel like we should go after Lawrence, Ansah or Clark in FA. We’ve tried and tried to addess DE in the draft for the last how many years. Still has not been able to. 

I think that just depends on the money they command. It isn't a good idea to try and bid for a pass rusher in free agency. That is a tough market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Nice-Carolina-Chuck said:

Lawrence, Ansah and Clark!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Lawrence I would love to have but not at "highest paid DE in football" prices. Ansah hasn't been able to stay healthy over the past three seasons, so it is hard to justify spending top 10 money on a player with his injury history. Clark is another guy I would like to get but much like Lawrence, I don't want to mortgage the future. If we can get Lawrence or Clark at a reasonable contract, I would welcome them in a heartbeat. My concern is that they will command massive salaries in the free agency pool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep, like I said, I don't mind guaranteeing them money, but make the contracts smaller amounts in order to minimize cap implications. I don't know about "half," the actual amounts, whether more or less than half, would have to be determined by the NFL and NFLPA (which will probably be highly contentious, if not "impossible").  I'm just for whatever leads to the best product on the field while also unaffecting my wallet. As an aside, the NFL owners are greedy bastards in my estimation. They're trying to keep a larger portion of the pie, but players' agents are greedy as well, and they've sewn seeds of greed among the players. It's not all their fault; we all know what our society has evolved into, but the NFL wants a bigger piece of our smaller pocketbooks and refuses to "negotiate" with us (that's why we don't have cheaper and more reasonable à la carte options to view games that they're gradually trying to migrate to paid TV), so fu<k 'em. And then on top of that we have guys trying to water down the product even more by feeding greed. Change the way things are done so that we can at least see players prove themselves on the field without throwing wrenches into the engine that pays guys that have proven they can play on a pro level.
    • So if one of the parents wants to buy the theatre group or the band lunch they should get banned?
    • OK, I didn't realize this was about high school, but...if I'm spending my personal money trying to help some kids out, then no one is going to tell me how to spend my money. I get enough of the government spending my money--allocating my tax dollars--to children who don't really need anything, and now they're trying to tell me how to spend my personal money? Sure, there are many other issues to consider and rabbit holes that we could go down due to ethical concerns because it concerns kids, and the need for transparency is extremely important, but maybe as opposed to trying to stop kids from benefitting in darkness, we need to open up the blinds (and blinders) a little bit so that they can benefit in the light. I get where you're coming from, but this is a loaded and layered issue, and I'm just trying to give you some food for thought. 
×
×
  • Create New...