Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REMINDER: THE SAINTS lNTENTIALLY INJURED BRETT FAVRE IN THE 2009 NFC CHAMPIONSHIP GAME


Recommended Posts

Yep it was straight garbage,..

actually the last sack before the interception,.. that was the high low, double sack and they seriously tried to kill him, spear tackled. Even with 2009 rules, Manning, Brady or anyone else would have gotten the roughing penalty and that would have been game over.

Brett was yesteryears Cam Newton,..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, GOOGLE JIM BOB COOTER said:

don't worry, saints fans have assured me that bountygate was a conspiracy against new orleans lol

Yeh I got news for them, they going to end up playing the Cowboys and the Bears in the playoffs,..

Brees is going to be the “old man in a rocking chair” this time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, GOOGLE JIM BOB COOTER said:

yes because the natural disaster that they had no control over and the things that they had total control over are the same thing

i mean it's not like sean payton is still the head coach or anything right

It like people trying to give us poo over the 1-15 season.  fuging stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

REMINDER: THE NFL COULDN’T PROVE ANY OF THEIR PAY-TO-INJURE CLAIMS AND ALL PLAYER SUSPENSIONS WERE OVERTURNED DUE TO THERE NOT BEING A SINGLE SHRED OF CREDIBLE EVIDENCE TO SUBSTANTIATE THEIR ERRONEOUS CLAIMS (WHICH WERE ULTIMATELY DISPROVEN THROUGH INJURY REPORT DATA)

Oh, and there’s the whole thing where Brett Favre himself considers it a sham. 

CBS: Favre calls Saints’ bounty allegations “just hearsay”

I think I’ll side with the source on this one, pal. 

:tongue:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Iron Saint said:

REMINDER: THE NFL COULDN’T PROVE ANY OF THEIR PAY-TO-INJURE CLAIMS AND ALL PLAYER SUSPENSIONS WERE OVERTURNED DUE TO THERE NOT BEING A SINGLE SHRED OF CREDIBLE EVIDENCE TO SUBSTANTIATE THEIR ERRONEOUS CLAIMS (WHICH WERE ULTIMATELY DISPROVEN THROUGH INJURY REPORT DATA)

Oh, and there’s the whole thing where Brett Favre himself considers it a sham. 

CBS: Favre calls Saints’ bounty allegations “just hearsay”

I think I’ll side with the source on this one, pal. 

:tongue:

Tagliabue dumped the players suspensions putting the bulk of the blame on the coaches, but his comments in no way said there was "NOT A SHRED OF CREDIBLE EVIDENCE".

Quote

Tagliabue vacated the players' suspensions, saying in his ruling, "I affirm Commissioner Goodell's factual findings as to the four players. I conclude that Hargrove, Smith and Vilma—but not Fujita—engaged in 'conduct detrimental to the integrity of, and public confidence in, the game of professional football ..." He laid primary responsibility for the scandal on Williams and Payton

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Iron Saint said:

REMINDER: THE NFL COULDN’T PROVE ANY OF THEIR PAY-TO-INJURE CLAIMS AND ALL PLAYER SUSPENSIONS WERE OVERTURNED DUE TO THERE NOT BEING A SINGLE SHRED OF CREDIBLE EVIDENCE TO SUBSTANTIATE THEIR ERRONEOUS CLAIMS (WHICH WERE ULTIMATELY DISPROVEN THROUGH INJURY REPORT DATA)

Oh, and there’s the whole thing where Brett Favre himself considers it a sham. 

CBS: Favre calls Saints’ bounty allegations “just hearsay”

I think I’ll side with the source on this one, pal. 

:tongue:

https://youtu.be/tJLqcWtdfbQ

kill the head

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, GOOGLE JIM BOB COOTER said:

don't worry, saints fans have assured me that bountygate was a conspiracy against new orleans lol

lol did you know Katrina really wasn't so bad, as far as storms go. It was the Government built levies that failed?

cue Zeppelin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd hold on to Walker - we have no OT depth at all. Freeling is a block of clay - all the tools are there and he appears to have a great attitude. He needs serious work on his technique to realise his potential though.
    • From my watch last night: They weren't trading out of 19 unless it was a daft offer once Freeling got there. They were clearly antsy to get Hunter - and Minnesota actually called to offer the trade down. They weren't trading out of the third round pick once Brazzell fell to it (and Canales would have been happy with him in the second round). They traded back a lot on Day 3 - even if Morgan 'Babe Ruth'd' it with Lee, Hecht and Wheatley; they clearly weren't the only guys they would have taken at those picks. I'm curious to know which player caused the reaction at the start of day 2 (Dan Morgan): "of course they'd pick him"
    • Watching this confirms that this staff and front office is super high on Monroe Freeling. I wouldn't be surprised if he's gotta a real chance to win the starting LT job in camp. If he does, we can look to flip Rasheed Walker to a contender desperate for tackle help.   As for Ickey I still really like him and wanna extend him but based on how the staff was talking about Freeling it might be time for ickey to start taking some practice sets at guard if he wants to stay here as we are gonna have to have figure out a solution for the contracts of Lewis and Hunt.  My preferred scenario for the Oline in 2027 is Freeling-Ickey-Hech-Lewis-Moton. 
×
×
  • Create New...