Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would the Panthers be interested in Greedy Williams?


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, WhoaaaCAM said:

He's a great player but without a pass rush no CB will succeed in our defense. I'm hoping Ed Oliver falls to us if we get pick 7

 

That’s a defensive tackle. We can’t ignore end any longer if we’re going defensive line. Peppers is 38 and addition is at least 30. Fresh legs needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, micnificent28 said:

That’s a defensive tackle. We can’t ignore end any longer if we’re going defensive line. Peppers is 38 and addition is at least 30. Fresh legs needed.

I just said "pass rush", being able to collapse the pocket from the interior would be a godsend from our defense. At 7 we should probably go BPA and ultimately one of the big guys will likely be there at that pick. Outside of Bosa there is no edge I like inside of the top 8.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, WhoaaaCAM said:

I just said "pass rush", being able to collapse the pocket from the interior would be a godsend from our defense. At 7 we should probably go BPA and ultimately one of the big guys will likely be there at that pick. Outside of Bosa there is no edge I like inside of the top 8.

I think Gary is just as good as Oliver and has the versatility to slide inside and push for the interior same as you would get from Ed Oliver.. whom I love. But after double dipping at dt and butler I just can’t bear another defensive tackle in a super deep defensive tackle class. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't need CB with the 1st pick. We have Bradberry, Jackson and Cocktrel. 3 good corners. Get a CB in the 3rd. I agree DE or DT with the 1st pick unless a great OL (especially Tackle) is there. Heck an amazing C to anchor the line would be good to. No matter who, they need to hit a home run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, musicman said:

We don't need CB with the 1st pick. We have Bradberry, Jackson and Cocktrel. 3 good corners. Get a CB in the 3rd. I agree DE or DT with the 1st pick unless a great OL (especially Tackle) is there. Heck an amazing C to anchor the line would be good to. No matter who, they need to hit a home run.

I think slot was a major weakness.. we don’t know anything about cockrell. If you draft a defensive tackle he right away comes in behind Poe and short sorta of like butler was being star and short. I don’t like the idea of taking  a luxuary defensive tackle when you can get starters right away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, musicman said:

We don't need CB with the 1st pick. We have Bradberry, Jackson and Cocktrel. 3 good corners. Get a CB in the 3rd. I agree DE or DT with the 1st pick unless a great OL (especially Tackle) is there. Heck an amazing C to anchor the line would be good to. No matter who, they need to hit a home run.

No we need a good corner , we are in the NFC south and have one of the worst secondaries in the NFL . Donte Jackson is solid , cockrell is unknown , bradberry is a decent rotation corner 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, micnificent28 said:

I think slot was a major weakness.. we don’t know anything about cockrell. If you draft a defensive tackle he right away comes in behind Poe and short sorta of like butler was being star and short. I don’t like the idea of taking  a luxuary defensive tackle when you can get starters right away.

If we drafted Williams, who would you put in the slot?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

If we drafted Williams, who would you put in the slot?

Jackson moves to slot in nickel and put greedy on the outside.  Bradberry has one more year left on deal, probably let him walk after next year cuz i dont see him being worth crazy money right now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course

The dude is the mpst hyped and best projected CB to come out of DBU since Patrick Peterson 

And there has been some good ones to come out of there since.  Tre'davious White, Donte Jackson, etc.

CB isnt up there with a issue as youd see DL, OL, etc

But any time a elite CB projected top 5 falls, you grab him.  And lets not forget.  Remember the Norman fallout? This is a contract year for Bradberry coming up.  And id be weary of giving him top #1 CB $$ as inconsistent as he's been.  And if he walks after next season, itll be similar to Norman all over.  In the meantime Donte Jackson could play Nickel. And this draft is Deeep at DL so you would still get a solid player in the 2nd

 

 

But Greedy aint going to fall to us.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can't help but think that you are equating physical attributes alone with wins. I don't subscribe to that thought. No one will argue that Young has a strong arm, but he makes up for it in other ways. The real limitation for him is he needs good route runners with great hands. That's why Young was so good at the end of the 24 season. Thielen and Coker were perfect receivers for him and he had his best games with them. Not having them to start the 25 season hurt. Look at the first 10 games in 25 with a rookie receiver and no Coker and then look at the final 7 games with a more experienced rookie and Coker back and there is a telling difference in Young's performance. Prior to week 10, Young had 1 game with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and 6 games with a rating below 90. In the last 7 games with Coker back, Young had 3 games with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and only 2 games with a rating below 90. The tools a QB has to work with matter more than their arm strength.  To go back to Darnold and Stafford, yes they both have great arm strength but neither had much success with that alone. As I already pointed out, Stafford, even with a canon for an arm, only had 4 winning seasons in his first 12 years. It was only when he went to the right environment that he had true success.
    • I don't love this role for him if I'm being totally honest The pregame show is much more flash than substance and doesn't seem like the right fit for what Luke would bring to the table, and that's his vision of the game. I'd like to see him do something where it more involves him breaking down film and explaining what he's seeing out there, as he sees the game in a way very few ever have.
×
×
  • Create New...