Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Moton LT of 2019? Not so fast...

MHS831

By MHS831,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted

For those of you wondering about Moton in 2019, did you wonder why he was not playing some LT yesterday?

That makes me wonder about Williams and a new contract.  Or the condition of his  knee.

We were one OT whiff away from CMC taking snaps.

Options?  Moton to LG,  Moton to RT without signing Williams,  Moton to left tackle even though we kept him on  the right side this season while the LT position sucked.

Since RR is the coach, who knows?   Does he think that far  ahead?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, Growl said:

yeah man, long, ideal LT frame? Blazing quick 1st step? Proven talent?

Let's move this player to OG.

 

 

He was a better G in college than T.  He has not consistently shown the attributes you have associate with him...If your LT sucks and you have the LT of the future at RT---what would you do? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
heel31ok Experienced

heel31ok

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

For those of you wondering about Moton in 2019, did you wonder why he was not playing some LT yesterday?

That makes me wonder about Williams and a new contract.  Or the condition of his  knee.

We were one OT whiff away from CMC taking snaps.

Options?  Moton to LG,  Moton to RT without signing Williams,  Moton to left tackle even though we kept him on  the right side this season while the LT position sucked.

Since RR is the coach, who knows?   Does he think that far  ahead?

 

Exactly on point about LT...the obvious choice is going after a good LT...which has been the obvious choice since Gross left...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ncfan Grand Master

ncfan

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Growl said:

yeah man, long, ideal LT frame? Blazing quick 1st step? Proven talent?

Let's move this player to OG.

 

 

Yeah

Haha some people on here

Dude handled Dallas's Lawerence better than most LTs in the league.  

But want to draft a guy like Little who scots says has the tools but is a project, and got beat pretty bad by some college pass rushers this year

 

 

Only Huddler would want to replace a guy who handled a probowl DE at LT and was solid in his other showings there.

To draft a project who gets beat by college pass rushers.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, RoaringRiot said:

Moton to LT and Williams to RT seems like the logical move. (yes even to Hurney) 

Rivera said he was going to takee a look  at players this week.  Why not let your future LT play LT? 

Is he  still  thinking Kalil  is  the man ?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RoaringRiot Collaborator

RoaringRiot

Posted
Posted
Just now, MHS831 said:

Rivera said he was going to takee a look  at players this week.  Why not let your future LT play LT? 

Is he  still  thinking Kalil  is  the man ?  

No. Matt's contract allows them to move on if he's post June 1. I would very much think this is what they're going to do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Growl Grand Master

Growl

Posted
Posted
Just now, MHS831 said:

He was a better G in college than T.  He has not consistently shown the attributes you have associate with him...If your LT sucks and you have the LT of the future at RT---what would you do? 

 

How does someone not consistently show the attributes I listed? lol.

This entire thread feels like setup for "there's this OT I want the panthers to draft in the 1st round and they should pass on bigger needs and two strong OT talents to do it."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mike2.0
      Can we get to 9-8?

      By Mike2.0 · Posted

      A winning record would be nice, but I still have us winning around the 6 to 8 game mark. Realistically we should beat the Jets and Saints, that gets us to 5 wins. After that, we have to face a lot of potential play off teams and our divisional opponents. I think we’ll win 1 or 2 of those games to take us to 6 or 7 wins, perhaps 8 wins if we can spring a further surprise.  Is that enough progress for head coach and QB? I’m not sure, it will depend on performances and output. That said, it’s nice to be back in a position where we are thinking about the play offs.
    • Mike2.0
      Eight of Bryce Young's nine wins have come off game-winning drives

      By Mike2.0 · Posted

      I would tend to agree about not falling into the trap and paying a below average QB, but sometimes situations can “force” a team to pay that QB. For example, if we play ourselves into a 9-8 like record, then what options will we have in the draft? Or do we avoid the draft and trade for or sign someone in free agency?  I’m not convinced by the 2026 QB draft class. There’s some intriguing prospects but no one that really screams “draft me”. I’m not sure we’ve got anyone really that stands out as a trade candidate or free agent signing. So although we might not want to commit a big money contract to Young, him playing well and showing progress might force the team’s hand. 
    • Mike2.0
      Trade Chuba?

      By Mike2.0 · Posted

      Realistically we would be looking at no more than a mid round pick for Dowdle or Chuba. Are we really that desperate for a mid round pick? Not really. I would much prefer us utilise the two RBs in a 1-2 punch similar to how we used D-Will and Stewart. After all, Bryce is not Drew Brees. He won’t throw for 300+ yards and carry the team consistently as a passer. So having a strong running game with a 1-2 punch will be beneficial to him, and it will also be beneficial to the RBs because we can spell them and not overwork them.
×
×
  • Create New...