Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anderson wasn't good enough for Carolina


Jmac

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Cdw said:

Yes, if used properly.  Had we perhaps sit a hurt Cam, put in a back up and relied heavily on a two headed rushing attack, yeah I could see a few more wins.  We wernt exactly playing many juggernaugts in that 7 game streak.

You could argue that sitting a hurt Cam alone would’ve netted us a few more wins...not sure why you’re bringing that up to answer whether CJ Anderson would’ve won us more games. Clearly Rivera had no interest in sitting Cam while we were in playoff contention; having CJ Anderson wasn’t going to change that part of our season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

You could argue that sitting a hurt Cam alone would’ve netted us a few more wins...not sure why you’re bringing that up to answer whether CJ Anderson would’ve won us more games. Clearly Rivera had no interest in sitting Cam while we were in playoff contention; having CJ Anderson wasn’t going to change that part of our season.

Well, youre right, having CJ wasnt going to change Rivera not sitting Cam.  In my hypothesizing how CJ could have helped us win more games I wasnt taking into account Riveras other bad decisions.  But the point was, relying on CJ and CMC instead of the backup could have won games.

But, I can also easily see winning a couple more games while still trotting hurt Cam out there if we were relying heavily upon a two headed rushing attack. So, the point still stands - CJ could have helped us win more games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From USA Today's Panthers Wire...

CJ Anderson's third straight big game raises questions about the Panthers

C.J. Anderson could not get on the field for the Panthers during his short time with the team. Instead of rotating running backs like a normal NFL team, they preferred to play Christian McCaffrey practically every snap, so they let Anderson walk in the middle of the season.

As magnificent as McCaffrey’s 2018 campaign was, Carolina’s loss has been the Rams’ gain. After a brief layover in Oakland, Anderson landed in Los Angeles and immediately stepped into a starring role with Todd Gurley out. He totaled 299 rushing yards and two touchdowns in LA’s last two games of the season. Anderson’s hot streak has now continued into the playoffs. Even though the Rams now have a healthy Gurley, they put Anderson to excellent use in their divisional round win over the Cowboys.

In the end, Anderson finished the game with 123 yards and two touchdowns on 23 carries.

This raises more questions about why the Panthers decided to let Anderson walk, when he could have served as one of the league’s better backups behind McCaffrey at a reasonable price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

This raises more questions about why the Panthers decided to let Anderson walk, when he could have served as one of the league’s better backups behind McCaffrey at a reasonable price.

What these folks dont understand is.... we needed to cut CJ loose.... how else were we gonna get a look at that CAP guy.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, KillerKat said:

Did I really just read an argument in Rivera's favor to cut CJ was "because we have holes everywhere else"? So apparently kids, if your football team has too many holes, you might as well cut every other exceptional player you have. Sounds legit. Jesus Christ, the huddle is full of morons.

Agreed.... when you have a team consisting of old over the hill players and JAG's,  is it a smart move to cut a legit power back to compliment the running game?

The reasoning on this board is ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

The Panthers would have been happy to have kept CJ in a backup role if CJ would have been happy with it. However, he was not and he was very verbal and weird about it. So, they let him seek greener pastures, which he did.

Heard some of that, in which case: great signing and superb work vetting that one out. 

Either way, Hurney done crapped his pants on this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

The Panthers would have been happy to have kept CJ in a backup role if CJ would have been happy with it. However, he was not and he was very verbal and weird about it. So, they let him seek greener pastures, which he did.

Which was an incredibly stupid decision.

You don't let a good backup go just because he's unhappy being a backup, even if he's behaving badly. That hurts your team's depth and rewards his bad behavior.

If Rivera couldn't handle him being upset, it's just another example of him being a weakling.

What makes it even worse, he was right. They should have been using him more. His performance with yhe Rams has made that clear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The larger point would be most offenses don’t utilize their tailback on every single offensive snap down the stretch. The utilization of a veteran back with a power build had been a staple of Carolina’s highly potent rushing attack for much of Rivera’s tenure. CMC averaged 5.0 ypc, and he did get 1000. But he only had 20+ carries two times. He carried the ball LESS in the final month than he had most of the season. He averaged 10 YPC against Tampa, but was only given 10 carries. 

Of course 22 is capable. Of course he had a superb year. But playing him for that many snaps is a terrible approach. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The staff did a poor job managing his expectations, and an equally poor job putting him in a position to contribute.

Anderson had a valid gripe. They never gave him a chance to provide a change-up. The few times they did, it worked very well.

All of it defies logic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ok--I have seen some sample items, and I would like to see something (if possible) measures on field intelligence--maybe how quickly you can grasp a playbook or absorb film session adjustments...Back when we had Morrison as team president and Hurney as GM, I offered to assess (as part of my research in education requirement at a University) emotional intelligence and learning styles of players to help coaches teach more effectively.  Morrison loved it and contacted me about it.  Hurney was not interested, and it fell through the cracks.  My pitch?  If only 50% of first-rounders become successful NFL players and that number drops significantly, can you tell me that you are effectively measuring talent?  Morrison thought it was a good point and wanted to do something that might improve long-term success rates--that would impact the cap management, etc.  Marty, according to Morrison, said he was not interested at this time and if so, he would want a football guy to do it.  (I told Morrison that I played in college and Hurney, a sports reporter at one time, did not. (He told me that Hurney played as a Guard in college--who knew?) Any way, about that time, Morrison left (2017) and the idea was dropped.  I reached back out a year later or so to Marty was still not interested.  A few days later, his wife accused him of assault or something, so I dropped it.
    • Pretty sure they still do the Wonderlic they just don't publicly release the scores.
    • I just thought he was under the radar--but thanks for opening our eyes to him.  I think we should have better measures for intelligence--such as reaction time, angles, etc. Legette is raw as heck, for example, and his RAS was very high.  We used to do the Wonderlic (which was not great) but to know how effectively a player makes on field decisions would be great.  
×
×
  • Create New...