Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CHECK OUT THE SAINTS FORUM

New York Panther

By New York Panther,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Davis83 Enthusiast

Davis83

Posted
Posted

LOL,  to even remotely think this goes to trial or replay is hilarious.  It's entertainment.

You would have every game challenged every week.

Like I heard today.  You will have every team "waiting" to call holding by an OL every time someone scores.

suck it up and get over it.  It's entertainment and although Saints fans are mad, the rest of us were quite entertained....lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherclaw Grand Master

pantherclaw

Posted
Posted
51 minutes ago, Palmetto said:

Like i said i agree about all the calls in the game  (which is the dead horse you're beating)

But we all  know the way the game did play out

The Saints win if a flag is thrown

Despite everything that happened they most likely  win 

So yea it shouldn't have come down to that play But it did

You won't acknowledge it but I'm use to it here

You have failed to acknowledge the ripple effect that the no calls all game long would have had on the game. It's not a dead horse. You won't acknowledge it, because it makes your point completely moot. 

I'm not arguing that that one play was a no call. 

I AM stating the Saints did not lose because of that ONE no call. 

They lost that game before then, and you can't even grasp the simple reasonings for it. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Palmetto Newbie

Palmetto

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

You have failed to acknowledge the ripple effect that the no calls all game long would have had on the game. It's not a dead horse. You won't acknowledge it, because it makes your point completely moot. 

I'm not arguing that that one play was a no call. 

I AM stating the Saints did not lose because of that ONE no call. 

They lost that game before then, and you can't even grasp the simple reasonings for it. 

Don't worry, I don't expect your IQ to double. 

Lol  love when people get so frustrated they have to  come with personal insults and let us all know  how high thier IQ is

Answer this last yes or no question

The game unfolds exactly like it did

If the  PI flag is thrown do the Saints most likely  win?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Palmetto Newbie

Palmetto

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, GOOGLE JIM BOB COOTER said:

the saints have one pick in the first 4 rounds of the draft lmao

michael thomas is also entering the final year of his very cheap deal. he should hold out imo.

what's he up to anyway?

hahahaha

Yea Next year if not this year could be the end of an era/Super Bowl run

And NFL would never overturn a game

That would be a chaotic situation for all sports and especially Vegas

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chaos Grand Master

Chaos

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Palmetto said:

Lol  love when people get so frustrated they have to  come with personal insults and let us all know  how high thier IQ is

Answer this last yes or no question

The game unfolds exactly like it did

If the  PI flag is thrown do the Saints most likely  win?

Let me jump in here real quick.  

Was this a blatant missed call?  Yep.

But because it happened near the end of the game, and was the last missed call of what were many, it's getting the most attention.  The missed call of the facemask when the Rams were about to score was just as egregious, but because it was earlier in the game, it gets glossed over by the one near the end of the game.  We don't know if the Rams would have scored a TD with first and goal, just like there is no guarantee with a first and goal the saints win with a FG as time expires.

Can't we all just agree that all missed calls suck but one is not more important than another, because they all equally effect the trajectory of the game?  IF Rams get that TD on the missed facemask call, the score and time and situation would have likely all been different.  

Too many variables to be definitive on any of this.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Don137 Newbie

Don137

Posted
Posted

There were missed calls all game on both sides. This miss call definitely impacted the last two minutes of the game but no one knows if the other missed calls  impacted the game. The previous missed calls helped the Saints get in that position. 

The Saints had the ball in overtime and even got a make up call in overtime for a PI on Rams. The Saints had their chances to win and didn't do it. 

Yes, a very crappy way to lose but I am not going to feel bad for such a classless coach that players deliberately tried to hurt the opponent to win a game. There fan base laughed at Panther fans when we got hosed in Super Bowl for all the bad officiating so why would I feel bad for them now? Its karma at its best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Palmetto Newbie

Palmetto

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, Chaos said:

Let me jump in here real quick.  

Was this a blatant missed call?  Yep.

But because it happened near the end of the game, and was the last missed call of what were many, it's getting the most attention.  The missed call of the facemask when the Rams were about to score was just as egregious, but because it was earlier in the game, it gets glossed over by the one near the end of the game.  We don't know if the Rams would have scored a TD with first and goal, just like there is no guarantee with a first and goal the saints win with a FG as time expires.

Can't we all just agree that all missed calls suck but one is not more important than another, because they all equally effect the trajectory of the game?  IF Rams get that TD on the missed facemask call, the score and time and situation would have likely all been different.  

Too many variables to be definitive on any of this.

 

 

I think I've agreed to all of that 

But a lot of people can't form an unbiased opinion separate from their fandom

Facebook-thumbs-up.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherclaw Grand Master

pantherclaw

Posted
Posted
56 minutes ago, Palmetto said:

Lol  love when people get so frustrated they have to  come with personal insults and let us all know  how high thier IQ is

Answer this last yes or no question

The game unfolds exactly like it did

If the  PI flag is thrown do the Saints most likely  win?

You're the one to throw insults first, but I apologize for stooping to you're level.

You keep missing, or ignoring the point, either way, it is ignorant. 

The refs decided they'd let the receivers and corner backs battle. 

That's what happens in the playoffs. 

And it makes your question moot. 

If the refs called the no calls all game long, the game would have been different. 

I'd be more upset if the refs had thrown a flag, because of their decision not to call the other no calls. 

Either way, the refs suck.  This brings me back to me original point, the refs were consistent all game long, and the Saints didn't lose that game because of one fuging no call. 

But please, keep beating that same ignorant drum the saints fans are. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Palmetto Newbie

Palmetto

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

You're the one to throw I insults first, but I apologize for stooping to you're level.

You keep missing, or ignoring the point, either way, it is ignorant. 

The refs decided they'd let the receivers and corner backs battle. 

That's what happens in the playoffs. 

And it makes your question moot. 

If the refs called the no calls all game long, the game would have been different. 

I'd be more upset if the refs had thrown a flag, because of their decision not to call the other no calls. 

Either way, the refs suck.  This brings me back to me original point, the refs were consistent all game long, and the Saints didn't lose that game because of one fuging no call. 

But please, keep beating that same ignorant drum the saints fans are. 

 

Cool story

Take chill pill 

You lost your cool a while ago

And I don't think I insulted you or anyone if so point it out

I'm a man I have no problems apologizing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • poorboysrev
      BREAKING: Panthers sign QB Kenny Pickett

      By poorboysrev · Posted

      Right...I think they've done really well. No one's going to bat 1000% but they've addressed areas of need and there's no comparison to the overall talent of the team now than when DC and then Morgan got the reigns. This whole season is about seeing how much of a step up can Bryce and this team make. If Bryce can't and last year is as good as it gets for him then at least we have a talented roster for the next guy. I think we're going to be good this season 
    • SmokinwithWilly
      BREAKING: Panthers sign QB Kenny Pickett

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      I said could, not would. I recognize he has potential based on past performance. Compared to what KP has done, Howell has more potential and the physical traits to make noise. KP has small hands and a weak arm. Not something you want in even your backup QB.  I've been hammering since last off-season before we re-signed Dalton, improve the room. Other than getting younger, I don't see how anyone can say we legitimately improved the room or even tried. We might as well have signed Josh Rosen.  Dalton is still on the roster for now. That's 3 QBs unless we trade or cut him. He's still Bryce's mentor after all. Do you believe we are going to draft someone with potential and give them a legitimate opportunity to develop from the practice squad? Are we going to carry 3 QBs on the active roster? 4 for a developmental rookie? Are we going to potentially cut KP if we draft a rookie and he's outperformed? Doubtful. Cutting Dalton(if we can't trade him) and KP would be 8m in wasted cap space.  I chose Howell as an example because he showed promise in his only full season as a starter. You could plug in another name with the physical traits and potential and what i said would still apply. KP showed almost nothing and was benched. I genuinely don't care if it’s rookie pick as long as there is the potential to develop into a future NFL QB.  As much as I can't stand him, Bellichek was always developing a number 2 QB even with the GOAT as his starter. The wisdom of that was evident when Cassell came in when Brady was hurt week 1 and went 11-5 and almost made the wildcard, which 11-5 gets you almost any other year. I give credit where it's due though. Cassel and Jimmy G both came into the league as developmental QBs, potential QB1s, and went on to have careers.  You never know if you never try. KP feels like a punt in addressing the most important position on the field. Bryce has never played 2 full games of franchise QB level football back to back.  If Bryce progresses, are you ready to offer a 280m 5 year extension based off a one hit wonder year? If Bryce regresses and we need a QB in 27, are we going to trade a fortune away again to trade up to 1 to get one? Are you ready to do the past 3 years all over again?  To me, it's not about Kenny Pickett. It's about the move itself. It was a feeble attempt to improve the QB room. We better hope Bryce succeeds, because if he doesn't, we literally have no backup plan right now.   
    • WhoKnows
      Center/Interior Line at 19

      By WhoKnows · Posted

      IOL that early isn’t good value at all. We have a LT who might not ever be good again and a RT that might retire soon. T seems deep early in this draft, so I’d go there in the 1st. 
×
×
  • Create New...