Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jourdan Rodrigue does not believe we are getting rid of Tory Smith


WarPanthers89

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

We're discussing Smith. The debate about CJ is a dead horse. Two entirely different situations! 

At the moment there is zero reason to cut Smith. Perhaps that will change in the coming days, weeks or months, but today there are reasons to keep him.

There are about 5 million reasons to cut Torrey Smith.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Cracka McNasty said:

I'm just saying, Logically speaking there's no NEED to do it now. The move can wait until it NEEDS to be made, then it should be. Until that happens though, I get why we aren't moving on at the moment. The money he is owed isn't guaranteed and we can recoup it at any point before the season starts, so why do it immediately?

If we cut him now, we're short a WR and then that becomes another hole we have to fill in FA and the draft.

If we cut him then bring him back, we are most likely going to be guaranteeing him at least 1 million of that 5 million, meaning we would only net save 4 million. So if we signed a guy and needed all 5 million to work with, we'd be SOL.

If we wait until after FA and draft, if a stud falls to us or we snag a vet WR for around 5 million then we show Torrey the door and free up 5 million in an instant. No harm no foul.

Also by waiting, we hold leverage over him in negotiations. It's a dirty move (that I really wouldn't anticipate Hurney doing) but if we wait until after the draft, other teams have filled out their rosters with young up and coming and cheap talent. IT'd be harder for torrey to find a job. That's when we could strong arm him and say "you will either take a pay cut and play for just over league minimum, or attempt to find a job and expect league minimum."

@Toomers

this response answers your most recent response at the bottom. It's leverage. 

Oh believe me. I wanted to use that “leverage” before last season. Been complaining for 6 months about it. Know where your going. 

  Agree until after FA and draft. You don’t need much then at all. Because people that command 5M rarely become available (see 2016) 

 And if this report didn’t specifically say keep him around, I would have been fine whenever it happened.  If I though Hurney would have the balls to hold him until TC and “screw” him, I could live with anything. I would. But like you said, he won’t 

 And if he agrees to a 1M deal. You do it. You can get 1M out of almost any contract. That will never keep us from signing anyone. 5M will. And there is no FA or draft for WR except late. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Cracka McNasty said:

I'm just saying, Logically speaking there's no NEED to do it now. The move can wait until it NEEDS to be made, then it should be. Until that happens though, I get why we aren't moving on at the moment. The money he is owed isn't guaranteed and we can recoup it at any point before the season starts, so why do it immediately?

If we cut him now, we're short a WR and then that becomes another hole we have to fill in FA and the draft.

If we cut him then bring him back, we are most likely going to be guaranteeing him at least 1 million of that 5 million, meaning we would only net save 4 million. So if we signed a guy and needed all 5 million to work with, we'd be SOL.

If we wait until after FA and draft, if a stud falls to us or we snag a vet WR for around 5 million then we show Torrey the door and free up 5 million in an instant. No harm no foul.

Also by waiting, we hold leverage over him in negotiations. It's a dirty move (that I really wouldn't anticipate Hurney doing) but if we wait until after the draft, other teams have filled out their rosters with young up and coming and cheap talent. IT'd be harder for torrey to find a job. That's when we could strong arm him and say "you will either take a pay cut and play for just over league minimum, or attempt to find a job and expect league minimum."

@Toomers

this response answers your most recent response at the bottom. It's leverage. 

I'm just of the opinion that Smith is not worth $5M. Nothing is going to change that. I see him as a veteran minimum type player. If I'm Hurney I've already sat down with his agent and hashed that one out to get it out of the way. We aren't paying you $5M. We aren't paying you anywhere close to $5M. I'll give you a veteran minimum salary with a $250k signig bonus as an incentive to sign because in no way am I guaranteeing you a roster spot so no matter what you can put pen to paper and walk away with $250k in your pocket. If not, then I'll shake your hand and wish you nothing but the best of luck and you can give me a call if you change your mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm just of the opinion that Smith is not worth $5M. Nothing is going to change that. I see him as a veteran minimum type player. If I'm Hurney I've already sat down with his agent and hashed that one out to get it out of the way. We aren't paying you $5M. We aren't paying you anywhere close to $5M. I'll give you a veteran minimum salary with a $250k signig bonus as an incentive to sign because in no way am I guaranteeing you a roster spot so no matter what you can put pen to paper and walk away with $250k in your pocket. If not, then I'll shake your hand and wish you nothing but the best of luck and you can give me a call if you change your mind.

And that’s how you GM. 

 I would have had this conversation last August. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Toomers said:

And that’s how you GM. 

 I would have had this conversation last August. 

Honestly, I think it's disingenuous to carry him on the roster right now with a $5M salary if you know full well you're going to turn around and try to strong arm him later into taking less. I wouldn't do business like that. I'd put it all out there up front and if the player wanted to shop around and see if there was a better offer I'd cut him loose and give him that opportunity at the start of free agency to give him his best chance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Honestly, I think it's disingenuous to carry him on the roster right now with a $5M salary if you know full well you're going to turn around and try to strong arm him later into taking less. I wouldn't do business like that. I'd put it all out there up front and if the player wanted to shop around and see if there was a better offer I'd cut him loose and give him that opportunity at the start of free agency to give him his best chance. 

That was my thinking. Torrey’s not the quiet type. Players despise been held and released after or at the end of FA. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/6/2019 at 12:26 PM, Asurfaholic said:

Do you trade one hole for another? Are we 100% set on WR and can afford to let go a known leader? 

I would much, MUCH rather keep Jarius Wright as our veteran leadership in that room.  The dude does nothing but get open, catch the ball and make first downs.  With Funchess exiting, it wouldn't hurt us to find another big receiver.  Wright, Moore, Samuel are all similar in terms of size.  There should be absolutely no doubt that CMC could play in the slot in a pinch.  We're good this season with or without Torrey . . . and we have other holes where we aren't good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Toomers said:

We are not keep him anyhow. 

Need money for FA

Dont really care but it’s better for the player

OK,,your turn.....

 This is how you answer questions. See how that’s done. Now try that without all the deflection of you don’t have a clue what you’re talking about. Or you would have answers like mine above. 

You don't know if we will ultimately keep him or not. Last season was derailed for him due to injury. There may be still enough reason for those making decisions to keep him, the same reasons why he was acquired in the first place. A healthy Cam and a healthy Smith may produce the desired result. being that his money is not guaranteed until September, there is little reason to ax him now. If circumstances and opportunities change between now and then, they can revisit his salary, or can him altogether. 

Now stop saying questions haven't been answered. You can refer to this post as often as necessary!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, top dawg said:

You don't know if we will ultimately keep him or not. Last season was derailed for him due to injury. There may be still enough reason for those making decisions to keep him, the same reasons why he was acquired in the first place. A healthy Cam and a healthy Smith may produce the desired result. being that his money is not guaranteed until September, there is little reason to ax him now. If circumstances and opportunities change between now and then, they can revisit his salary, or can him altogether. 

Now stop saying questions haven't been answered. You can refer to this post as often as necessary!

The entire point of this thread is a beat reporter talking about us NOT releasing Smith.

Unless you are talking about rolling this 5M over to next season, by the time September rolls around there will be very little opportunity to use said 5M.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, thefuzz said:

The entire point of this thread is a beat reporter talking about us NOT releasing Smith.

Unless you are talking about rolling this 5M over to next season, by the time September rolls around there will be very little opportunity to use said 5M.

 

And the beat reporter is speculating (in a tweet no less). 

Perhaps they will ultimately keep him. If they do so, it will be because they value him differently than you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, top dawg said:

You don't know if we will ultimately keep him or not. Last season was derailed for him due to injury. There may be still enough reason for those making decisions to keep him, the same reasons why he was acquired in the first place. A healthy Cam and a healthy Smith may produce the desired result. being that his money is not guaranteed until September, there is little reason to ax him now. If circumstances and opportunities change between now and then, they can revisit his salary, or can him altogether. 

Now stop saying questions haven't been answered. You can refer to this post as often as necessary!

Those aren’t answers. Those are prayers. 

 This has always been an “if” discussion. Because of a direct statement. 

  And numerous people have given mountains of evidence to show he is not worth it. Your “ answers” are “may” and “may” and could happen. So you bet on the least likely outcome. Makes sense.

 That you want to argue that there is a possibility that’s Torrey Smith is worth 5M this year.....that says enough about you. 

 And refer to Crackas post. Those are answers. Actual situations. And the same opinion that if he’s here after  FA , something is wrong. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Toomers said:

Those aren’t answers. Those are prayers. 

 This has always been an “if” discussion. Because of a direct statement. 

  And numerous people have given mountains of evidence to show he is not worth it. Your “ answers” are “may” and “may” and could happen. So you bet on the least likely outcome. Makes sense.

 That you want to argue that there is a possibility that’s Torrey Smith is worth 5M this year.....that says enough about you. 

 And refer to Crackas post. Those are answers. Actual situations. And the same opinion that if he’s here after  FA , something is wrong. 

 

Your reasons are opinions.

I could care less how you feel about me. 

Your opinion doesn't matter any more than mine. Tepper's, Hurney's, Rivera's, and Turner's opinion are the one's that matter. If they deem Smith worth keeping, so be it. If they can him, so be it. There are reasons they may decide (or want) to keep him. Deal with it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Your reasons are opinions.

I could care less how you feel about me. 

Your opinion doesn't matter any more than mine. Tepper's, Hurney's, Rivera's, and Turner's opinion are the one's that matter. If they deem Smith worth keeping, so be it. If they can him, so be it. There are reasons they may decide (or want) to keep him. Deal with it!

So now age, injury, stats, and drop rates are opinion? That’s adorable. 

  You mean I don’t run the team? Oh No! What to do?????????????

 Did you pound your hand and stomp your foot when you hit send?  Funniest thing I’ve read today. 

 

 

  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
    • Won’t stop until people stop buying overpriced poo.
×
×
  • Create New...