Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers released Matt kalil


uncfan888

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

Normally I’d agree but he back the brinks up for solder too, and his moves in Ny are similar to the ones here 

He's blowing up the Giants, not signing players like this. And he never has. Except this one, single time. Not similar at all.

Hurney making better moves without JR hovering.

I'm not a Gettle fan but I've been here to long to believe otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Lumps said:

He's blowing up the Giants, not signing players like this. And he never has. Except this one, single time. Not similar at all.

Hurney making better moves without JR hovering.

I'm not a Gettle fan but I've been here to long to believe otherwise.

Fair enough, but the Odell situation, Collins and solder contract look similar to the Norman situation, Smith, and kalil contract 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Lumps said:

He's blowing up the Giants, not signing players like this. And he never has. Except this one, single time. Not similar at all.

Hurney making better moves without JR hovering.

I'm not a Gettle fan but I've been here to long to believe otherwise.

OT Nate Solder - 4 year, 62 million

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't believe it's as easy as saying that anyone believes that Rico had the 10th best day on offense. Grades are done in a vacuum inasmuch as they can be. By their very nature, skill positions are always going to account for more "production" in reference to stats, and RBs perhaps even more than WRs because they touch the ball more. You can't look at PFF's grading system, or any football grading/grading system (like perhaps Football Outsiders or Next Gen Stats), so simplistically. If a player has an excellent day, relative to his position, relative to his assignments, and relative to his number of snaps, then he should be graded highly. It's up to the reader (or the analyst, if you will) to put what you're seeing into context, and that's not only in relation to the grades, but the general situation (like whether a player is playing injured, who they're playing with or against---the general situation). Even the fact that (presumably) PFF or news outlets put out a list of the highest and lowest grades, that doesn't mean that said players were the most impactful of the day, it just means that they did or didn't do their job the best, based upon a certain set of parameters. PFF is a part of life for football analysts, talking heads, execs, coaches, players, and even fans (even if indirectly), all to varying degrees. It is a tool that is used by all 32 teams. Obviously it's not viewed so dismissively by franchises as a whole. Execs obviously don't look at it as a bunch of bozos making sh¡t up on the fly. Fans can berate it or swear by it, but it isn't going anywhere.  The only thing that I can tell you is that perspective and context matters.
    • Im not big in to PFF but their guys were raving about his blocking along with our other skill players in the run game. https://youtu.be/D4kL_N97cFQ?si=sJWSZCUA1bj5otyx  
×
×
  • Create New...