Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF top 50


AU-panther

Recommended Posts

PFF recently released their top 50 prospects for this years draft.

https://www.profootballfocus.com/news/draft-pffs-top-50-big-board-for-the-2019-nfl-draft

I find it interesting that several players we have shown interest in seem to be highly thought of by them.  Maybe that is a good sign for us.

Murphy #6

Dillard #13

Burns #14

Savage #28

They seem to factor college production into their projections a little more than traditional media list you see.  An example would be Gary, who they have at 48.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Might have to renew my pff sub just for the draft insight. Wish Mayock was still doing his for the masses..

It's almost feels like Hurney was using a copy of Mayocks top 100 from last year... extremely strange how all our guys were picked at almost the exact number they were rated at on that list.....even Gaulden iirc. 

Top 10 would be relatively easy...top 100 though...weird coincidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems Hurney 2.0 has fully embraced analytics to help him and his scouting department. Guys we've been scouting are definitely individuals who check the production + athleticism combo. I was wondering why we haven't been as high with Clelin Ferrell when he's so nearby. Probably may have to do with Clelin's hesitancy to do athletic testing and film wise he just doesn't seem to be an athlete. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, AU-panther said:

PFF recently released their top 50 prospects for this years draft.

https://www.profootballfocus.com/news/draft-pffs-top-50-big-board-for-the-2019-nfl-draft

I find it interesting that several players we have shown interest in seem to be highly thought of by them.  Maybe that is a good sign for us.

Murphy #6

Dillard #13

Burns #14

Savage #28

They seem to factor college production into their projections a little more than traditional media list you see.  An example would be Gary, who they have at 48.

 

PFF nailed the Baker Mayfield projection of #1 player in the draft last year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

PFF nailed the Baker Mayfield projection of #1 player in the draft last year. 

I'm glad someone pointed this out.  I don't always care for PFF but they nailed Baker last year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, PantherNation123 said:

I know Baker looks like he'll be good, but jury is still out.  I'm skeptical TBH

Oh yeah for sure, I think you need 4 years to eval a rookie. I'm just saying most analysts had him as the 4th best and I think he played above that for his first year.    

Looking back at their big board for 2018 they also had Derwin James at 5 which aged well. Of course, some others did not.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm really not stressing about upgrading from Bryce. I'm frustrated with our inability (or refusal) to recognize overall bad QB performance and failure to seriously address the issue. QB is the most impactful position on the field, and we're not only settling for what we've been given to this point, but we've rewarded it with a fully guaranteed 5th year extension for a player that's never played 2 NFL franchise QB quality games back to back in 3 seasons. I can't understand how that's ok from a coach's or GM's viewpoint. Successful franchises don't do things like this. It just doesn't make sense.  We do not have a top half of the league QB right now. Since we don't have that player, we should be looking for him. Pickett isn't it. Grier isn't it. Bryce hasn't proven he is yet. Until you have that sure fire franchise QB, you keep looking. You're not consistently making the playoffs, a deep run, or a SB appearance without one.  What's the worst that could happen? We end up with 2 potential number 1 QBs? How horrible. 
    • Easy to understand Pickett, if this is anywhere close to on point. Canales wants to get as close to Bryce as he can- get the pace and timing in the throws as close a he can to Bryce. So the other players don’t have to adjust so much, to a new guy.       If Cam was the 1, he would look for a rocket arm.  But Bryce is the 1. Look for limited in the same way.  Low velocity, plenty of air under it, feels just like home when Picket comes in. And you have the guys on the second team not having such a radical adjustment (if they have to play) like with Dalton to Bryce.    Enter Grier. I guess we will collect those types.   
    • Best part is if we draft him, we can also use him as our fourth and one QB sneaker
×
×
  • Create New...