Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Message board Scouts let's see what you got.


Sub Zero

Recommended Posts

Just a quick skills check.. After watching this all defensive snaps look at Brian Burns .. What are your observations.. Give atleast 5 no more than 10..

Example : Offensive Philosophy for the offense..

Stats for Burns..

Defensive alignments..

Stuff like that and more..

Get them boys!! Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only needed to watch two minutes to see the following:

1) Has a ridiculously quick first step

2) He sets and holds the edge well in the run game and is disciplined.  Most of our young DEs we've had before (Delaire, Hall, Ealy, etc) struggle keeping playing time because they are not disciplined and do not set the edge (it's not all about just getting after the passer).

3) He's been asked to drop into coverage

4) He takes plays off when he's tired (definitely coachable)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, X-Clown on 1 said:

Only needed to watch two minutes to see the following:

1) Has a ridiculous quick first step

2) He sets and holds the edge well in the run game and is disciplined.  Most of our young DEs we've had before (Delaire, Hall, Ealy, etc) struggle keeping playing time because of they are not disciplined and do not set the edge (it's not all about just getting after the passer).

3) He's been asked to drop into coverage

4) He takes plays off when he's tired (definitely coachable)

This...ppl

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Michaelinraleigh said:

I watched the first 1:50

As I've been saying bad pad level and definitely bad hands. Doesn't deliver a consistent good punch nor does he maintain separation and work his leavers as he moves flat down the line of scrimmage. 

I'll break down more later.

I can't wait..lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few observations..

1. All the worry about his size.. BC didn't run to many plays his way.. He didn't get pushed back alot held his ground pretty well...They double teamed him 50% of the time.. They chipped him repeatedly with a RB or TE.. And paid for it when they left there OT on a island..

2. I like how he was able to move around.  Rush from either side.  Lined up in the middle and dropped in coverage (got beat a few times 1 on 1) .. He has alot of versatility..

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm no scout but I'll tell you what I see; both the good and the bad.

  • As mentioned above, his pad level is not great at all which can be hard on a taller lankier guy.
  • Has to use his hands better when getting off blocks.
  • Has to continue to build up his frame. There's times where he's being pushed around by bigger OT's
  • If he's going to really be an OLB and not just a pass rushing DE then his coverage has to improve
  • I think his effort isn't always there. Hard to tell from film.
  • Definitely has a fast first step
  • He is very disciplined when it comes to containment and forcing runs inside. That won't help him get on the stat sheet much but it is what you typically ask your ends to do.
  • Needs more power to finish his tackles.
  • Seems to get lost in the muck sometimes but being a step back from the LOS might help him.
  • Frankly he isn't as disruptive as I'd like for a first round pick to be and he's going to be a project. Hope I'm wrong, and I do believe he'll develop with better coaching and size, but I don't see him pushing for ROTY.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gets shoved around by bigger tackles

hands aren’t the greatest

looks to rely on pure athleticism at times

coverage skills are slightly above average

 

Hes going to be a project starting out. Ron said as much when asked if he would be starting day one...

“Brian will be part of the rotation”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

Hes going to be a project starting out. Ron said as much when asked if he would be starting day one...

“Brian will be part of the rotation”

Thats a 1st rounder folks.

A good rotational fit.  Everything a team wants in a first rounder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

Gets shoved around by bigger tackles

hands aren’t the greatest

looks to rely on pure athleticism at times

coverage skills are slightly above average

 

Hes going to be a project starting out. Ron said as much when asked if he would be starting day one...

“Brian will be part of the rotation”

Didn't see none of that 1st observations at all.. Do you have a time stamp?? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Many Panthers fans are already excited about second-round selection Nic Scourton for a variety of reasons including but not limited to: the Panthers needed to recharge the position group, Scourton had a late first-round grade according to many (including the Panthers), and he fit this season's modus operandi of stopping the run now and forever. However, Scourton was seen early on as one of the top-3 EDGE guys in this class but fell due to not having quite the season at Texas A&M as he did prior at Purdue (his sophomore season). It's been revealed since then a few different things that speak to that dip in production... Texas A&M, for one, requires each player on their line to be able to hold two gaps. This also explains why we saw low production across the board from the other two TA&M prospects but were still being heavily touted. Scourton was also said to have bulked up to 280lbs in order to fulfill this role and noticeably suffered from it. He's expected to play this season with Carolina at 255 - 260 which is very different from most situations. In most situations, teams are wanting players to gain 15 - 30. Since Scourton is going to be playing at his Purdue weight, I thought it would make sense to dive more into that tape. Y'all... we might have gotten something special... Let's take a quick peek at the stats before we start drooling over some highlights. First, a summary of the last two seasons for Scourton: Second, the game splits: The first thing that pops up for me is how Scourton's sack numbers were cut in half his senior year. We've already pointed out issues with scheme that impacted the TA&M linemen from racking up numbers, but seeing the game splits it's clear that Scourton didn't exactly feast on inferior competition while at Purdue. He had two two-sack games (vs. Michigan (2023 - 2024 champs), Indiana) and a 10-tackle game (vs. Nebraska). I also see the 2024 games where he went up against two top-10 tackles (Will Campbell from LSU + Armand Membou from Missouri) that I watched leading up to the draft.  For those who just want a summary: Scourton looked elite at Purdue and is going to be rotating in often during his rookie campaign. I originally had him penciled in as the second-string, strong-side edge defender behind Clowney but I wouldn't be surprised to see the team have him and Pat Jones II moving around when they rotate in in order to find where Nic looks best. Here's a highlight reel to replace that Cialias you lost in your recliner tonight:   For those that like to use their own eyes: Below I'll be linking the linking the five games I've mentioned above. If you plan to watch all of them, I highly recommend going in the order listed as that will allow you to see him vs. Campbell and then Membou while dealing with the aforementioned things he dealt with at Texas A&M before seeing him look unstoppable in 2023 when he was allowed to play both at a comfortable weight and in a scheme that didn't require him two cover two gaps nearly every play. vs. Will Campbell (2024) vs. Armand Membou (2024) vs. Nebraska (2023) vs. Michigan (2023)   vs. Indiana (2023)  
    • Yea, i honestly think he had almost as much say as Dan.  One of the main reasons I think that is Eager has said before he was ever with the Panthers, that you trade away picks for a qb and for any other position you do pick swaps, and that's exactly what we did.
    • For a LB that is a long career.  They take a beating.  Shoulders and head.  My favorite LB of All Time--Junior Seau--had a 20-year career--the average career for a STARTING MLB is 5.6 years.  I really think Shaq is done, but if he can play, it does not mean that he should.   Think about Morgan's career--7 seasons.  Luke's career--8 seasons.  Beason played only 93 games over 10 years--only 5 seasons where he played 15 games or more.  The other 5 seasons?  No more than 5 games per.  So basically, the average starting MLB plays 90 games in his career.  Shaq has played 123 games and was pretty injury free until the last 2 seasons (6 games total). 
×
×
  • Create New...