Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Good afternoon


The Lobo

Recommended Posts

Can’t deny stats 

Real deal .. Cam just needs to show everyone that he can win the big game to solidify a history  of dominance. 

Unfortunately stats and field cred disappear pretty quickly if you don’t have that signature/big baller  win. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rbsponsel52 said:

The league is different now than it was before and it has changed in a lot of ways.

The times they are a changing. The more things change the more they stay the same. Time may change me but I can"t change time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, pennywise said:

Different league now and then 

You’re right it is different, but should that matter? If it were that big of a deal, why does everyone go nuts about Brees breaking Marino’s record a while back? It was a different league back then too right, but not one discredits Brees. Same said for these stats. New players stats are always compared to older players, it’s not uncommon. I’m Cams first 8 years he has less ints than Jim Kelly in his first 8 years. Modern NFL passes way more, so by that logic, wouldn’t Newton have more INTs?

heres their comparisons:

94ED250C-2B30-45A5-B6D7-73515E1F8CD5.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't even begin to compare the two.

 

In Montana's first full season as a starter, 2 quarterbacks threw for 4000 plus yards.  In Cam Newton's first season, 10 of them threw for 4000 yards and three threw for 5000.  Of the top 10 qb's yardage wise in 1980, only two of them completed more than 60% of their passes.  In 2011, all of the top 10 completed more than 60%.   In 1980, over half of the top 10 qb's in yards had more than 20 interceptions.  In 2011, only 1 did.    The rules and styles were just different than they are now.  

https://www.insidehook.com/article/sports/nfl-rule-changes-created-golden-era-quarterback-stats

Quote

“By and large, the NFL has really tried to enhance scoring and benefited the offense,” 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

You’re right it is different, but should that matter? If it were that big of a deal, why does everyone go nuts about Brees breaking Marino’s record a while back? It was a different league back then too right, but not one discredits Brees. Same said for these stats. New players stats are always compared to older players, it’s not uncommon. I’m Cams first 8 years he has less ints than Jim Kelly in his first 8 years. Modern NFL passes way more, so by that logic, wouldn’t Newton have more INTs?

heres their comparisons:

94ED250C-2B30-45A5-B6D7-73515E1F8CD5.jpeg

No.

DB's could get away with more, and qb's were far less protected than they are now.   The average starter in Joe Montana's first season had 20 plus int's.   Dan Fouts had 24, and was considered by many to be the best qb in the NFL that year.  In Cam's first season, he had 17 and that was one of the higher numbers in the NFL for starters.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Can't even begin to compare the two.

 

In Montana's first full season as a starter, 2 quarterbacks threw for 4000 plus yards.  In Cam Newton's first season, 10 of them threw for 4000 yards and three threw for 5000.  Of the top 10 qb's yardage wise in 1980, only two of them completed more than 60% of their passes.  In 2011, all of the top 10 completed more than 60%.   In 1980, over half of the top 10 qb's in yards had more than 20 interceptions.  In 2011, only 1 did.    The rules and styles were just different than they are now.  

https://www.insidehook.com/article/sports/nfl-rule-changes-created-golden-era-quarterback-stats

 

 

Oh I think Joe is the GOAT and in no way do I think Cam is Montana. I just thought it was a neat comparison and Cam deserves more credit than he gets poo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Lobo said:

Oh I think Joe is the GOAT and in no way do I think Cam is Montana. I just thought it was a neat comparison and Cam deserves more credit than he gets poo.

I think if Cam's arm is healthy, he is one of the better qb's in the NFL.  

I am just not a fan of comparing qb's from different era's.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
    • Winning ain't gonna make my eyes lie to me. Context matters, and it will always matter in the game of football.
×
×
  • Create New...