Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The “Newton/Rivera” Panthers vs. reigning AFC/NFC champs


ellis

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, ellis said:

Not a bad track record for this regime. As you can see, the quarterback deserves a lot of credit for that. 

 

When does the quarterback not get most of the credit good or bad? I love how folks act as if every head coach's success isn't highly tied to the success of their quarterback. Show me one successful coach who has consistently had great success with crappy quarterbacks.  Of course the team's success is highly influenced by play of the quarterback. Sure you could argue the Ravens won the Superbowl without a good quarterback a few decades ago. But would even Belicheck be great without Brady?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, panthers55 said:

When does the quarterback not get most of the credit good or bad? I love how folks act as if every head coach's success isn't highly tied to the success of their quarterback. Show me one successful coach who has consistently had great success with crappy quarterbacks.  Of course the team's success is highly influenced by play of the quarterback. Sure you could argue the Ravens won the Superbowl without a good quarterback a few decades ago. But would even Belicheck be great without Brady?

 

Trent Dilfer won a Super Bowl. Kerry Collins played in a super bowl. Rex Grossman played in a super bowl

I’m not really disagreeing with you, but it certainly happens

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:

Trent Dilfer won a Super Bowl. Kerry Collins played in a super bowl. Rex Grossman played in a super bowl

I’m not really disagreeing with you, but it certainly happens

And only Dilfer won a Super Bowl with arguably the best defense of all time. But that doesn't address my post. Again what coach has had consistent success with crappy quarterbacks. You pointed out three examples where a coach has ridden a great defense one year with a crappy quarterback although you could argue Collins didn't suck for the Giants. So again  what coach has had consistent success without a good to great.quarterback. the answer is still none. Of course quarterbacks for winning teams have to make scoring drives in the 4th quarter, that is why they get paid 20-30 million a year. If you can't make game winning drives in the 4th quarter when it counts you get replaced by someone who can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, panthers55 said:

And only Dilfer won a Super Bowl with arguably the best defense of all time. But that doesn't address my post. Again what coach has had consistent success with crappy quarterbacks. You pointed out three examples where a coach has ridden a great defense one year with a crappy quarterback although you could argue Collins didn't suck for the Giants. So again  what coach has had consistent success without a good to great.quarterback. the answer is still none. Of course quarterbacks for winning teams have to make scoring drives in the 4th quarter, that is why they get paid 20-30 million a year. If you can't make game winning drives in the 4th quarter when it counts you get replaced by someone who can.

In the last 20 years or so, none.  Historically, Joe Gibbs won three superbowls with average/slightly above average qb's, but the rules were different then.  

But I do agree with you, the Ron can't win without Cam narrative is ridiculous.  Bill B has a losing record without Tom Brady.  Bill Walsh never won a Superbowl without Montana.  Good players need good coaches and vice versa.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
    • Blacksheer's time was up when they drafted Etienne. 
×
×
  • Create New...