Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

84% of Bucs fans say Winston is a bust.


Captain Morgan

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Iron Saint said:

Winston has a .382 winning % as a starter (21-34 in 55 games started).

Locker has a .391 winning % (9-14 record in 23 games started).

How can a player with a lower winning percentage than a player that is considered to be a bust, also not be a bust themself?

Winston is a bust himself, but unlike the Chargers, Titans, and Raiders, the Buccaneers refuse to cut their losses and admit they whiffed on the #1 overall pick and will ride him out through his 5th year.

What’s even more disheartening is they’re paying him $20,922,000 this year. Pay me $20.9M and I can throw two pick-6’s every game just like Winston did Sunday. I might even throw in a dance afterward to add a little razzle dazzle and let them get their money’s worth.

I for one like Winston in TB a lot and hope he is with the Bucs for the next decade.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Iron Saint said:

Winston has a .382 winning % as a starter (21-34 in 55 games started).

Locker has a .391 winning % (9-14 record in 23 games started).

How can a player with a lower winning percentage than a player that is considered to be a bust, also not be a bust themself?

Winston is a bust himself, but unlike the Chargers, Titans, and Raiders, the Buccaneers refuse to cut their losses and admit they whiffed on the #1 overall pick and will ride him out through his 5th year.

What’s even more disheartening is they’re paying him $20,922,000 this year. Pay me $20.9M and I can throw two pick-6’s every game just like Winston did Sunday. I might even throw in a dance afterward to add a little razzle dazzle and let them get their money’s worth.

Bucs won  2 games the  year before Winston got there, Lovie Smith was his HC to start with, there are other reasons besides Winston's play for a .400 winning percentage.

Winston has the same problem that many young QBs have when drafted by a bad team- he never gets to spend time in the same system. He's on his 3rd HC/offense in 4 years. Makes a huge difference.

Not saying that he was ever going to be elite, but he might have been a solid QB if put in one system and allowed to really learn it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Iron Saint said:

Winston has a .382 winning % as a starter (21-34 in 55 games started).

Locker has a .391 winning % (9-14 record in 23 games started).

How can a player with a lower winning percentage than a player that is considered to be a bust, also not be a bust themself?

Winston is a bust himself, but unlike the Chargers, Titans, and Raiders, the Buccaneers refuse to cut their losses and admit they whiffed on the #1 overall pick and will ride him out through his 5th year.

What’s even more disheartening is they’re paying him $20,922,000 this year. Pay me $20.9M and I can throw two pick-6’s every game just like Winston did Sunday. I might even throw in a dance afterward to add a little razzle dazzle and let them get their money’s worth.

I hate people who use win rate as a individual indicator. Winning is a team statistic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, micnificent28 said:

Also I'm not entirely sure it's his fault on the field. The bucs ownership and coaching has been a mess..

The Bucs organization is an unholy mess from the top down and has been for a long, long time.

As long as the Glazers continue to own it, nobody should hold their breath on that changing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Chairman Wow said:

Career passer rating:

Winston: 87.0

Cam Newton: 86.3

Realistically, Cam Newton is Jameis Winston with better running ability. 

If Cam is done as a runner, this team is in deep poo.

Statistically Cam is a very slightly better passer than Winston....very slightly.

Now Cam has had better defenses, ownership, and coaching than Winston.  Winston has had better WR's.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My general take on the state of the team not going too in depth is this: Either Morgan or Canales (hard to say whether it’s the players or the system/coaching, and that goes for any team) has been responsible for considerable strides forward on D and a bit more productive offense, but it’s been a small sample size and we collapsed at the end of the year. I lean towards it being more Canales growing as a coach and building a culture of buy-in and getting the most out of players in the locker room. My reasoning for leaning there is that Morgan was part of the Fitterer stink and it’ll take him a while of sustained success in roster management to overcome that in my mind. Next year is a big year to see if that was a fluke or not. These big signings this offseason are exciting and sometimes teams can have amazing FA classes but more often than not those who spend big and “win the offseason” don’t show the results in the regular season.    As far as QB goes, in a vacuum I’m completely fine with the Pickett signing, he’s ok value for a backup and a huge improvement over Dalton. If Bryce went down there isn’t a huge drop off there and if the rest of the team builds on last year they could win games with him under center. I’m not sure the ‘85 Bears could win games with current Dalton under center. But the O is just so damn limited with Bryce and Pickett does not push him at all, he’s purely a backup. So I agree we I’d love to see a QB with some upside drafted, a guy who could actually push Bryce if/when he struggles or doesn’t improve any further. He’s improved steadily the last 2 years but it has been from arguably worst in league history to still below average. I’m not convinced he can get any better than purely average at absolute best. I hope he can man but I just don’t see it happening. And the longer we keep penciling him as starter the less confidence I have in this staff. Even with our unexpected relative success as a team last year sometimes you do have to take another step back to take a step forward, and that could mean moving on from Bryce, and temporarily going with a slightly worse player like Pickett while aggressively trying to upgrade the position and taking dart throws in the draft/free agency on upside players. I know, there wasn’t much available this offseason outside of Willis, and this draft class seems to be poor at QB. But I’d have preferred we try something and if it didn’t work and we took a step back then just keep trying until something hits. Rolling with Bryce is just delaying the inevitable and living in purgatory.    just my 2 cents, hope I’m proved wrong
    • His market value is 15.7 million. Not worth it to bring him at his age, at that price. If we were to bring in a veteran, DeAndre Hopkins is available for 2 million market value. I've said this in other threads, get Keenan Allen to play the slot. He's as good as a pass catching tight end and is market is under 7 million.
×
×
  • Create New...