CMC sets record in SB era

[mc52beast]

Not sure if this was already posted. Proving doubters wrong one record at a time 

 

[TheRed]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't he play every offensive snap in the game?

Yes this is a very nice record, but we had 3 active RB's, CMC had a record setting day, and we still lost.

[DeAngelo Beason]

10 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

Not sure if this was already posted. Proving doubters wrong one record at a time 

 

The Panthers have also never won a game where McCaffrey has 10+ receptions...

 

It ain't a good thing.

[Khyber53]

3 minutes ago, TheRed said:

Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't he play every offensive snap in the game?

Yes this is a very nice record, but we had 3 active RB's, CMC had a record setting day, and we still lost.

My friends, there is a perfect example of spotting the punchbowl at a party and putting a turd right in the middle of it. 

[DeAngelo Beason]

1 minute ago, Khyber53 said:

My friends, there is a perfect example of spotting the punchbowl at a party and putting a turd right in the middle of it. 

I think it's a valid point though...

[TheRed]

5 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

My friends, there is a perfect example of spotting the punchbowl at a party and putting a turd right in the middle of it. 

Since when is it a good thing to be one dimensional in an ever evolving NFL?

[Popsickle]

16 minutes ago, TheRed said:

Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't he play every offensive snap in the game?

Yes this is a very nice record, but we had 3 active RB's, CMC had a record setting day, and we still lost.

 

David NewtonESPN Staff Writer 

Christian McCaffrey had a big day, playing 100 percent of the snaps, rushing for 128 yards on 19 carries and catching 10 passes for 81 yards. But is that necessarily a good thing? According to ESPN Stats & Information, the Panthers are 3-6 when their star back gets more than 20 touches, and 0-10 when he catches at least seven passes.

Share

 

•  

[WarPanthers89]

20 minutes ago, DeAngelo Beason said:

The Panthers have also never won a game where McCaffrey has 10+ receptions...

 

It ain't a good thing.

Again, that is a bad stat. Most games were lost last year, when Cam couldn’t throw more than 15 yards and CMC was his only option. 

[Icege]

26 minutes ago, TheRed said:

Since when is it a good thing to be one dimensional in an ever evolving NFL?

I think that the CMC touches were less of an issue than "missed opportunities" (ie: missed FG, turnovers, giving up sacks, inaccurate throws, etc).
 

If anything, his production kept us in the game. I don't think that bringing in one of the back-ups was going to change that more than not being able to convert on 3rd down nor stop the Rams when it their go.

[DeAngelo Beason]

18 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

Again, that is a bad stat. Most games were lost last year, when Cam couldn’t throw more than 15 yards and CMC was his only option. 

It's a symptom that we can't throw the ball deep and attack downfield.  Whether that's due to injury or not is insignificant.

[Daddy_Uncle]

They are going to cut his career short with the work load they put on him. I know he's in incredible shape but still. Have to start mixing it up with other guys

[thefuzz]

Anyone want to ask why, after all these years we are needing to throw to the RB so much?

[TheRed]

30 minutes ago, Icege said:

I think that the CMC touches were less of an issue than "missed opportunities" (ie: missed FG, turnovers, giving up sacks, inaccurate throws, etc).
 

If anything, his production kept us in the game. I don't think that bringing in one of the back-ups was going to change that more than not being able to convert on 3rd down nor stop the Rams when it their go.

We agree fundamentally.

We didn't lose the Rams game because CMC had a big day, we lost off too many mistakes and lack of adjustments in the first half. We wasted too many drives.

My remarks are about our longevity as the season progresses. With 3 RB's active there's no reason to continue forcing CMC into playing every snap.

[thefuzz]

12 minutes ago, TheRed said:

We agree fundamentally.

We didn't lose the Rams game because CMC had a big day, we lost off too many mistakes and lack of adjustments in the first half. We wasted too many drives.

My remarks are about our longevity as the season progresses. With 3 RB's active there's no reason to continue forcing CMC into playing every snap.

Oh, but there is.  He is by far and away our best player.  We cannot seem to move the ball without him on the field, this has likely shown it's ugly face in practice and Ron sees it first hand.

That ties in with what we all believe to be the case....win or you lose your job Ron.  Do you think for a minute that Ron cares about how CMC is going to feel in 4 years?  Hell no.  He cares about winning....NOW.

If we had a strong GM, he could step in and at the very least ask why Ron is spelling CMC, and putting him in position to be more fresh late in the season, and let him know that as a key cog in the wheel, he is going to try to re-sign him when he can, and doesn't want him to be like Gurley is now.

Alas, we don't have that either, as we all think that Hurney is likely out the door along with Ron if they don't win together.

Now you have two desperate people at the top of the food chain, and taking your best player off the field for a look down the road 2 years just ain't in the mix.