Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Confidence Boost! ...maybe???


mrknowitall

Recommended Posts

So I know a lot of folk are concerned with Cam’s ability to be great after his performance in game one. 

Here was his stat line:

C/ATT: 25/38, 65.8%

YDS: 239, 6.3 AVG

TD: 0

INT: 1

FUMBLE: 1

RTG: 72.1

===========

C/ATT: 21/35, 60%

YDS: 262, 7.5 AVG

TD: 0

INT: 1

FUMBLE: 1

RTG: 71.4

 

The second stay line is Brady’s, against the Rams, in the super bowl. 

Maybe, that doesn’t mean anything and isn’t a fair comparison. But maybe Cam was actually just rusty like he claimed, and he’s still as capable as he always has been of being a tremendous quarterback. 

Rejoice! Because tonight the Panthers will come to kick ass and chew bubblegum. And they’re all out of bubblegum. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wasting time and energy defending Cam's play is a fool's errand.  We lost the turnover battle and couldn't stop the run --- if those aren't the two keys to winning any game, then I don't know what is.  Cam is good enough to beat any team out there on his best days, and still half of them on his average days.  But if his supporting cast doesn't do their job, Uncle Rico himself can't overcome lack of execution, sloppy turnovers and brace yourself...missed opportunities with four fumbles and zero recoveries. I sat in the nose bleeds with an endzone view and 75% of the time I saw our D-Line getting gutted, over pursuing plays and completely abandoning their gap assignments...yet Cam and his head scarfs are the ones to blame...oh okay den.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've said all week that what Cam did on Sunday is actually much better that what the average mob thinks it was.

TD's and INT's tend to work themselves out over the season.  But if you take his stat line from Sunday and extrapolate completions, attempts and yards over 16 games you get 400 / 608 for 3800 yards at almost 66% completion.  It would only take a couple big games to become a career year for him.  If Sunday is "bad Cam" for 2019, we are in for a helluva show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, BrianS said:

I've said all week that what Cam did on Sunday is actually much better that what the average mob thinks it was.

TD's and INT's tend to work themselves out over the season.  But if you take his stat line from Sunday and extrapolate completions, attempts and yards over 16 games you get 400 / 608 for 3800 yards at almost 66% completion.  It would only take a couple big games to become a career year for him.  If Sunday is "bad Cam" for 2019, we are in for a helluva show.

Any of us could run that offense from sunday. Checkdowns and hitches

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I like Jaycee a lot and appreciate his leadership but to say he's above Ramsey right now is based on hopium let's be realistic. He's got a great deal to prove this season. I’m hoping to see that he firmly establishes himself amongst his peers.
    • It’s amazing how simple it is. When you are winning 2-7 games for 7 straight years, you’d think people would understand that just drafting some starters isn’t poo unless they are above average NFL starters. Justin Jefferson and Jamar Chase started their rookie years like Legette did so we got an elite WR in the 2024 draft. Luke was a rookie starter just like Wallace. Damn we basically got a Kuechly and Jefferson last year. Bravo Dan Morgan!!!
    • I didn’t even say they would be starters. I don’t think Legette will be and Coker was not drafted. Coker chose to sign with us because our WR room gave him a chance to start even though we drafted a guy in the 1st. That should tell you something when Coker chose to come to Carolina even after we took Legette. We drafted and signed guys to potentially replace Sanders, who isn’t a starter yet over Tremble) and Wallace. Go look at our other drafts since Rhule. We had tons of rookie contribution from all of our recent classes. Why, because our overall talent sucked and we needed bodies. Go look at PFR. Here’s some of our players who “started” for a year: TMJ, Mingo, BC, Ian Thomas, Jermaine Carter, Dennis Daley, YGM and Roy. That’s what Legette and Wallace are right now although unless TMac bombs, Legette has kind of already lost his spot. We’ve had shitty drafts since 2018 and every single one has contributed at least two guys who’ve started so 2024 is tied for last right now and we just had a draft where we took 3 more players who play the same position as 3 of our top 4 picks in 2024 but somehow I’m saying that the 2024 draft class is good? Nope, the 2024 draft class was bad and our team is still in the low enough talent quadrant that lots of rookie contribute in our holes until we replace them. Been the same story since 2018 and accelerated as the old solid vets retired/move on.
×
×
  • Create New...