Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Sunday Football Games Thread


Hoenheim

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, MVPccaffrey said:

Just watching Red zone the last two weeks, it's not even close.  Cam isn't a top 25 QB in this league anymore.  We have got to make a change

Let’s see if Rivera fixes the line and let’s see if  Cam has planned runs. If they want him to get going they must do this

This mini break of a few days maybe good

cam was a Heisman winner and a mvp   He will try and rally  

probably being away from home for two weeks will be good too but yes it it continues to the bye with no improvement, a change may need to made, he may need to go on IR   

We don’t know what’s wrong with him but the bottom line is they know something is

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was watching the Cards-Ravens game.  There was a play a few minutes ago where both teams had a penalty against them.  The first flag was at the snap with an illegal formation on the Ravens.  The second flag while the play continued was against the Cards for a personal foul horsecollar tackle on Jackson.  The ref said that by rule, the illegal formation is vacated and the personal foul was enforced.

 

Didn't we have a play on Thursday where there was a personal foul against the Bucs but a "normal" penalty by us and they were offset?  Does anyone know which fouls are deemed to overrule an offset?  I have never understood this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, hitman80 said:

Was watching the Cards-Ravens game.  There was a play a few minutes ago where both teams had a penalty against them.  The first flag was at the snap with an illegal formation on the Ravens.  The second flag while the play continued was against the Cards for a personal foul horsecollar tackle on Jackson.  The ref said that by rule, the illegal formation is vacated and the personal foul was enforced.

 

Didn't we have a play on Thursday where there was a personal foul against the Bucs but a "normal" penalty by us and they were offset?  Does anyone know which fouls are deemed to overrule an offset?  I have never understood this.

Seriously. Any personal foul/unsportsmanlike conduct penalty should negate any normal penalty on the other team. It just makes too much sense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Raleigh PF said:

Seriously. Any personal foul/unsportsmanlike conduct penalty should negate any normal penalty on the other team. It just makes too much sense. 

Absolutely.  There has to be something in the official rules about what gets deemed a priority when there are offsetting penalties, I would think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think Dave touches the defense. That might be a mark against him but definitely a huge red flag for evero. He refuses to run anything other than soft zone and when you don't get pressure that's an awful scheme
    • You don't have to convince me. I think not picking up the option should absolutely be firmly on the table but I just do not see Tepper and Morgan doing that for previously stated reasons. Therefore I'm not going to bother entertaining the notion. Just hoping we actually get real viable competition. If that doesn't happen at the minimum then my perception of that is complete and utter professional malpractice.
    • It was absolutely a catch, and I can’t believe how many folks were stating, before the NFL’s apology, that the overturn was the right call.  The ultimate question in this case is this: can a player complete a catch with only one hand? Of course, we all know the answer to that question, and it is an emphatic “Yes.” T-Mac maintained complete control with one hand (believe it was the right) while the other came off when the ball hit the ground. The ball was in the same position in the one hand (watch T-Mac’s fingers in relation to the NFL shield on the ball) after touching the ground as it was when it first went to the ground. Going back to the question above, if one hand can establish control, then there was no need for the other to stay on the ball, so long as the ball doesn’t move in that one hand that stays on it   It blew my mind that they overturned this in the first place. This should not be a “We got it wrong on the replay because there wasn’t clear and convincing evidence.” This should have been, “That was absolutely a catch.”
×
×
  • Create New...