SB nation article says you are stupid if you think there's a true QB controversy

[Bronn]

The Tinderbox doesn't create enemies.

Terrible takes, one-sided agenda posting, and years of crotchety old man posts is what draws the animosity people here get.

Football itself is a controversial thing.

To whine and complain about the Tinderbox every time a terrible take gets exposed as potentially having underlying motives is pathetic.

[raz]

4 hours ago, Bronn said:

I lol'd because raz is clearly not a socialist

i am, i use to register as one but i wasn't getting to vote in primaries  

[Icege]

Lots of posters here are unable to compartmentalize and address things in a manner to seek understanding (not necessarily agreement). There are a select few here that are capable of debating in one thread while agreeing in another.

Sucks, but folks gotta do something with all of that butthurt they're carrying around.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[Mr. Scot]

4 minutes ago, Bronn said:

The Tinderbox doesn't create enemies.

Terrible takes, one-sided agenda posting, and years of crotchety old man posts is what draws the animosity people here get.

Football itself is a controversial thing.

To whine and complain about the Tinderbox every time a terrible take gets exposed as potentially having underlying motives is pathetic.

Maybe.

Or maybe it's that thinking your personal crusade is so important that you can't even allow people to have a civil discussion about football makes you a self-important douchebag.

[raz]

yeah, and if you username is lemao shames you're an even bigger douche

[MasterAwesome]

1 hour ago, Peppers90 NC said:

What the tinderbox has done has created enemies and the hatred from there comes over to the main forum, where we should have the very least, the Carolina Panthers best interests in common. But no, once you(not you) find out someone is on the other side of the political spectrum, you will never agree with them on anything else. It's the way of the 2010's unfortunately.

What? You mean saying "Hey you posted _______ in the Tinderbox 9 years ago so I can automatically discredit anything you say about the Panthers" isn't a valid debate tactic?

[Peppers90 NC]

4 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

What? You mean saying "Hey you posted _______ in the Tinderbox 9 years ago so I can automatically discredit anything you say about the Panthers" isn't a valid debate tactic?

[arbnranger]

6 hours ago, Peppers90 NC said:

Is the tinderbox so dead that the piranhas are so desperate to get their jollys off that it has spilled over in the main forum? It really has gotten out of hand.

It’s like the twilight zone in here recently. 
I may go to the TB to discuss football. 

[arbnranger]

2 hours ago, Bronn said:

The Tinderbox doesn't create enemies.

Terrible takes, one-sided agenda posting, and years of crotchety old man posts is what draws the animosity people here get.

Football itself is a controversial thing.

To whine and complain about the Tinderbox every time a terrible take gets exposed as potentially having underlying motives is pathetic.

Unfortunately Bronn, You’ve turned into the “Inception” of political takes.

Take a TO 

[Malt Liquor]

I not going to lie the offense seem to play more in sync, and at a faster tempo with Kyle Allen as the quarterback. Team chemistry is a large factor in a team's success. I love Cam but I'm being brutally honest. I never understood why it takes Cam so long to break out the huddle, and get a play off.