Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Plenty of teams interested in Newton trade...


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Nesbro1 said:

You can't keep both after this year. 

With the Cap room getting rid of Cam brings we would be crazy to keep him.

 

This is based on what we've seen from Kyle being his floor with plenty of room for improvement. If this is what we can get from KA for the next 10 yrs then I trade or cut Cam by the free agency period next offseason and don't even  blink.

Why can’t they keep both?  Kyle costs nothing in nfl terms and his tied to us thru 2022 I believe.  And cap is going up every year.  No reason why they can’t if they want to.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tepper's Chest Hair said:

But Trubisky is horrible. 

I understand why Chicago would make that trade in a heartbeat.

That trade would be absolutely horrible for Carolina.  Trubisky is the single biggest reason the Bears are stinking.  Why would we want him?

Too early to judge that ...especially coming off the injury...but applying your logic the same can be said about Cam...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, heel31ok said:

Too early to judge that ...especially coming off the injury...but applying your logic the same can be said about Cam..

What logic?

Trubisky is bad at playing QB.  I am not judging his injury.  I am judging his horrible play.  He has yet to show he has what is required to be a long term solution for anyone.  Most likely he will become a journeyman backup.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, heel31ok said:

Its just business and better longterm investment...

Business? Yes.

Better long-term investment? No.

Trubisky isn't very good, and it's not like he's new. He's had plenty of time to show what he is, and what it is is a subpar quarterback.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Roger all that. Do you think BY avoided any sacks last game? This oline is not what you're touting them to be. They are much better then 2023! Much much much better than 2023. But come on now, you'd expect this expensive oline (most are run blocking specialist) to at least dominate in the run game every game.  And... I keep telling you our WRs and TEs are not that good yet. I mean last Sunday was a prime example. Our receiving targets never make plays like those. Never. And this is from one of the worst teams in the league. Shough could have easily had 3 INTs if not for his receivers making plays on the ball. Our guys just don't do that. XL almost allowed an INT backing up out of bounds instead of coming to the ball. And everyone would have blamed that on BY. That's why he doesn't throw to that dude. I can't recall a game except maybe the second Falcons game - maybe, where I thought our receivers could possibly be better than the other team's. I think TMac and Coker have a lot of potential. But they're aren't consistent. But they're young and WILL improve. I'm confident of that.  I don't agree that BY was drafted to only stand in the pocket. He has always been best off schedule - for better or worse. 
    • Do you think you will get a direct answer?  Icky giving up 5 pressures (playing hurt in his defense) by himself and Bryce only getting sacked once tells you he played well in the pocket.  He extended plays and converted some tough downs.  
    • I've been very apprehensive about potentially firing yet another head coach. But Canales needs to focus on being a head coach first and foremost and begin handing off some responsibilities like playcalling duties and begin overseeing the entire team or we need to assess all possible ideal HC candidates in the offseason.
×
×
  • Create New...