Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Failing to trade for Trent Williams...


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

... is starting to sound like a wise move.

Remember Bashaud Breeland? This story has some similar vibes to it.

Standoff between Washington and Williams getting stranger

He returned to the team on Tuesday after no trade happened, with the obvious goal of ensuring that, come 2020, he’d be only a year away from free agency. Washington, if it chooses, can (continue to) play hardball with Williams, arguing that his inevitable failure to be on the active roster for at least eight games tolls his contract by a full year, keeping him from becoming a free agent until after the 2021 season.

Then came Wednesday. Williams passed a physical, until he didn’t. For the first time in recent memory (or perhaps ever), a player who received a thumb’s up from doctors retroactively failed the examination. In this specific case, Williams has discomfort when wearing a helmet, due to the area on his head where a tumor previously was.

There’s an element of poetry at play here. Whether discomfort is genuine or of the Jalen Ramsey variety, the relationship between Williams and Washington went haywire because of the team’s mishandling of the growth that was on his head. Unlike Ramsey, however, it won’t be enough for Williams to decline to practice and play due to pain in his head. Inevitably, Washington will dub the condition a non-football injury, shut him down for the season, refuse to pay him, and attempt to toll his contract.

Williams’ next move would be to challenge the designation, claiming that it’s actually a football injury, not because it happened on the field but because (as the argument would go, if he makes this specific argument) team doctors allowed him to keep playing with the growth on his head, and that he wouldn’t currently be suffering pain when trying to wear a helmet if they’d simply advised him to shut it down last season and have the tumor removed. Whether that argument holds water depends on whether a doctor would express that opinion within the confines of a grievance.

Regardless, the next few weeks may feel a little like watching Kasparov play Karpov after plying them with a fifth of vodka.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing weird about this situation at all, Williams just isn't gonna forgive the redskins medical staff for missing a tumor in his head. 

Imagine if the growth in his head WASN'T benign. 

Williams knew his season wouldn't count if he eventually had to report to Washington out of shape, so he came back in tip top shape and then said "wait this helmet isnt comfortable" 

Regardless what happens next, his season will count

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, jumpman910 said:

Regardless what happens next, his season will count

It might, but I think that's a long way from being guaranteed.

9 minutes ago, Forty-Eight said:

Never believed we wanted Williams. 

Neither did I. A number of fans were pushing for it though.

That said, I'm not convinced yet that either Little or Daley offers us a long-term solution.

There's still time to determine that, of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, jumpman910 said:

Nothing weird about this situation at all, Williams just isn't gonna forgive the redskins medical staff for missing a tumor in his head. 

Imagine if the growth in his head WASN'T benign. 

Williams knew his season wouldn't count if he eventually had to report to Washington out of shape, so he came back in tip top shape and then said "wait this helmet isnt comfortable" 

Regardless what happens next, his season will count

This. The guy said he was never playing for the Redskins again and I think it's pretty obvious at this point that he absolutely meant it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, raz said:

this is not like breeland at all.  the team dr's fugged him hard

It is in the sense that he was healthy, and then he wasn't.

It's not an exact parallel, but some of the same weirdness.

And of course it's the Redskins, whose medical staff could probably stand to be scrutinized just a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

This. The guy said he was never playing for the Redskins again and I think it's pretty obvious at this point that he absolutely meant it.

That part I agree with.

I do kind of wonder how things like the Brown, Ramsey and Williams situations are going to affect upcoming CBA negotiations.

The owners are going to want conditions to prevent this kind of stuff from happening in the future. The Players Association will be pushing in the exact opposite direction.

Also worth remembering that David Tepper is expected to play a large role in those negotiations, and he's got a rep for being a hardass (hell, look at how he got the team).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

That part I agree with.

I do kind of wonder how things like the Brown, Ramsey and Williams situations are going to affect upcoming CBA negotiations.

The owners are going to want conditions to prevent this kind of stuff from happening in the future. The Players Association will be pushing in the exact opposite direction.

Also worth remembering that David Tepper is expected to play a large role in those negotiations, and he's got a rep for being a hardass (hell, look at how he got the team).

Will he show Drew Brees a pie chart?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think it was fear of the unknown because he tried to hide the extent of the injuries that made him drop. After the drop, the reports I heard were that teams knew what was wrong with his knee and it was something similar to another athlete from a few years ago (honestly don't remember if it was even a football player).  That it was basically one of those things where he should be fine for a while, there isn't a huge concern of immediate injury risk.   But what he has going on with his knee is something that is degenerative and there's little chance he'll be able to play more than 5 or so years on it before he won't be able to play anymore. So basically it was teams knowing if they draft him, he's probably going to be only a rookie contract player and even if he's great, you might not be able to get use out of him on a second contract.  Which in turn makes the drop make sense, but I'm kinda surprised some contending team didn't take him late in the 1st, hoping he'd put them over the top on a SB run but then not even have to worry about giving him a big contract in 4 years too.
    • Depends if they see the writing on the wall with their roster and contracts and decide to bite the bullet and begin a complete rebuild and roster overhaul.  I have no clue why some franchises (IE us) refuse to do this and keep half assing trying to win 8 games or so.  Do it correctly, take your lumps and build a contender.  We shall see what loomis decides.
    • Each team plays 17 games.  I do not see why they don't just have each team play one international game per year.  Neutral site game, 8 home, 8 away.    
×
×
  • Create New...