Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFC South Rivalry


WarHeel

Recommended Posts

It was brought up yesterday during the presser and Ron made mention of his time in Chicago and how GB and Chicago could be considered the the biggest rivalry in the NFL let alone sports. When asked who he considers the biggest  rival in our division he responded “all of them.” 
 

Then this article was dropped today and I figured it would generate an interesting discussion.

 

Who does The Huddle consider our biggest rival? 
 

I’d have to say Falcons but I definitely think it’s a dynamic movement as we are still such a young team respectively. 
 

https://www.panthers.com/news/panthers-nfc-south-rival-falcons-saints-buccaneers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

In my mind you have to measure up to your opponents competitively in order for it to be called a rivalry.

Rivera coached teams have pretty much been owned for the last several years by the Falcons and the Saints.

That leaves Tampa.

 

I feel like we’ve owned TB with the exception of a couple lowly seasons. Prove me wrong with the stats though if I’m being ignorant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • i am anxious to see what he does with this new situation. i think the schedule is about as favorable as you could hope for the first half of the year. i don't expect a dramatic and quick  improvement, but i do expect improvement.
    • truthfully, when did he have time last year to throw it down field? plays took far too long to develop and the OL gave him no time.  i think we are basing far too much of bryce's assessment on a situation that didn't work out in his favor at all. it was probably the worst situation a rookie QB could have found himself in. the only i can think of who had it worse was David Carr, who had an even worse rookie season than Bryce by a significant margin statistically.  i think most would realize that carr was probably a better QB than his record would show, but he was shell shocked in his first few years because they did nothing to try to help him out. 3 of his 5 years in houston he led the league in sacks. i don't think he would ever have been an elite QB, but had he been in a better situation he probably would have had a better and longer career. point is, i don't think we saw everything that bryce is capable of because he was limited by the situation. but i understand the pessimism most have, because all we really have to go on was what we saw last year. that's why i wait to see what happens with a better situation. i just don't think you can give an accurate assessment of him based on last year. it wouldn't be fair for any rookie, tbh, but for one whos situation was so fugged up i think it's even more unfair. had nothing changed in the situation, you could probably expect more of the same. that's just not the case, though. a whole lot changed for the team and for his situation and i think for the better. it just makes sense that if we improved the situation that he will improve. 
×
×
  • Create New...