Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The 2020 GM Candidate Study


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, carpanfan96 said:

I'll add this here.

ESPN article about gm openings.  Link

sources seem to think that both positions would be under Hurney and perhaps the executive VP would be a younger executive working toward an eventual GM job there or elsewhere

Doesn't sound like they know much about the actual story since it's been clarified for quite some time that it's one position, not two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Doesn't sound like they know much about the actual story since it's been clarified for quite some time that it's one position, not two.

Its their gm article for teams most likely to fire a gm, just thought it was interesting.  They also mentioned going after omar from the Steelers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, carpanfan96 said:

Its their gm article for teams most likely to fire a gm, just thought it was interesting.  They also mentioned going after omar from the Steelers. 

Understood. Disappointing though.

The article posted above is more of a general information piece, not so much directly about us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this point, I would take an inflatable doll in a room full of pins over what we have. 

or

My dogs make better GMs every morning and I have to pick those up and throw them away.

 

I really hope we have competence on it's way. I am really uneasy about how this will shake down but 3 out of 13 is just awful. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That new home page looking sexy and thicc
    • Serious question:  Why LG and not RG?  There may be something I do not know, but Hunt's contract is huge and he could be let go after this season (post june 1 cut) and it would save the Panthers a ton of money.  Extending him would be paying a G who is in his mid 30s guaranteed money (and I do not see that as a terrible thing).  So if we release him at age 31, we save $19m.  I like him, but at 31, will he be worth the mega contract?   LG Damien Lewis has actually outperformed Hunt and he is a year younger.  He would also save less vs. the cap and leave less in the dead cap pool.  While his current contract expires after the 2027 season, he is a better prospect (IMO) to extend because only 50% of his current contract was guaranteed.  Here are his contract numbers.   Now, getting to Ickey--he could want LT money if he is offered a second contract.  If we pay him LT money to play either G positions, we are likely overpaying.  Secondly, the injury he suffered could be one that limits his productivity.  Ickey was improving, but he was an average LT.  The only way I re-sign Ickey is to have him accept a G contract and make a lot of it incentive based.     I feel like I am missing something, but in my mind, Ickey was always a guard if you consider the fact that he is an average OT and would be a great G.  Is that still the case (injury)?
    • Supplemental draft uses picks from next year. So a team were to draft him in the 1st, their upcoming 1st next draft would no longer be available. There have been some notable players that were obtained in the supplemental draft, such as Kosar. It doesn't necessarily happen every year either, and is more on a as needed basis. The gambling trouble is a big red flag for teams, and maybe pushes him down to a 4th? Not sure a team would use a 1st on him.
×
×
  • Create New...