Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Drafting 6-8: A Historic Look at Prospects & What 2020 Holds


davos

Recommended Posts

Saints need to play for a buy so no doubt we're losing putting us at 5-11.

As mentioned elsewhere, we sit at #8.  Can't leap the Giants or Miami if they win but can leap either the Jaguars or Chargers.

The Jags could easily beat the Colts.  The Chiefs-Chargers game is pointless unless the Chiefs really think the Dolphins can beat NE, so both could happen.

So we are firmly locked at pick 6, 7 or 8.

Let's look at the past few drafts...

2018

6. Quenton Nelson OG Colts     7. Josh Allen QB Bills     8. Roquan Smith LB Bears

2017

6. Jamal Adams S Jets   7. Mike Williams WR Chargers    8. Christian McCaffrey RB Panthers!!

2016

6. Ronnie Stanley OT Ravens   7. DeForest Buckner DT/E 49ers     8. Jack Conklin OT Titans

Notables from years past:

2015: Leonard Williams, Vic Beasley

2014: Mike Evans

So what I take is that this has a huge HIT rate.  The first real bust I see is Kevin white in 2015. 

 

--

Now onto the 2020 draft...

Big Board (Just pulling from multiple sites for the clear top tier):

1. Joe Burrow QB LSU (Gone to Cinci)

2. Chase Young DE Ohio State (Top talent in draft, Gone)

3. Andrew Thomas LT Georgia (Gone)

4. Derrick Brown DT Auburn

5. Tua Tagovailoa QB Alabama

6. Jerry Jeudy WR Alabama

7. Jeffrey Okudah CB Ohio State 

8. Justin Herbert QB Oregon

9. AJ Epenesa DE Iowa

10. Tristan Wirfs LT Iowa

11. Jedrick Wills LT Alabama

12. CeeDee Lamb WR Oklahoma

 

Now we need to accept we are in well range of Herbet & Tua.  That's just the way it is and discussion will be rampant.  Depending on how Hurts looks tonight, he could be catapulted similar to others of the past.  I have my eye on him later on but who seems to jump out as the biggest impact talent in this crop? 

For me: I really like this AJ Epenesa kid.  He's a multi-scheme DL talent that can anchor a 3-4 line at DE.  He's best as a pure 5-Tech in a 3-4 so that may make a ton of sense here.  If Derrick Brown is gone for the NT position, this spot is a huge need.  That JJ Watt sized guy on our line is needed so badly and this kid is a monster but athletic as hell.  Burns may have the potential to beef out but I'd rather keep him athletic at the EDGE.  We need a DE desperately and this kid seems to fit what I think is our biggest defensive weakness.  We need an all-around type talent with huge upside.  We're in position to get a high floor, high ceiling type.  If there's not a NT to anchor the center of the D, then this is where you look IMO.  

Quick breakdown of Epenesa:

6'6' 280

2019: 49 total tackles, 11.5 sacks, 4 FF, 14 TFL

And he totally came in clutch for the bowl game, named MVP, and has really been on a tear since late October:

https://www.hawkcentral.com/story/sports/college/iowa/football/2019/12/28/holiday-bowl-analysis-aj-epenesa-turns-tide-iowa-football/2757444001/

0d1b842bfc9747b4661dcaf2e9cf95f4_crop_no

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

This also shows offensive linemen are the safest route, albeit not the most sexy.  We need linemen, screw the flashy, diva skill positions.

Yep, that was part of what came out of the look back.  The biggest historical busts are skill positions this high.  Though OT has been pretty hit or miss in the top of the draft for some time now when teams select project-type prospects that hit all the measurables.  There's a handful of sure-fire talent here.  I would hate to trade down unless is just a few spots and we get other top picks. 

There's clearly a NT, DE, and OT in this crop to be cemented on our line long term.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Not feeling a WR. With our QB uncertainty and trash OL, I just don't think adding a top 10 WR would be a good investment. At least not in the short-term anyway.

I agree.  Do think we should look at a WR in this draft but maybe not this high.  Jeudy is going to be a star though and pairing him with Moore would be mouth watering but we need a line and consistent guy behind center throwing it.  I'm more on the 2021 Justyn Ross train once things are fixed up a bit more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, davos said:

I agree.  Do think we should look at a WR in this draft but maybe not this high.  Jeudy is going to be a star though and pairing him with Moore would be mouth watering but we need a line and consistent guy behind center throwing it.  I'm more on the 2021 Justyn Ross train once things are fixed up a bit more.

Yeah, a mid-round possession/red zone type WR would make sense.

It seems like this organization has been prone to knee-jerk type overreactions in recent years. We needed size at WR and went overboard with the KB/Funchess twin towers experiment. Then we needed speed at WR, so we went with Moore and Samuel but now we lack size at WR. We couldn't rush the passer last year, so we got rid of all our beef at DE and went pure speed and now we can rush the passer but we can't stop the run to save our life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah, a mid-round possession/red zone type WR would make sense.

It seems like this organization has been prone to knee-jerk type overreactions in recent years. We needed size at WR and went overboard with the KB/Funchess twin towers experiment. Then we needed speed at WR, so we went with Moore and Samuel but now we lack size at WR. We couldn't rush the passer last year, so we got rid of all our beef at DE and went pure speed and now we can rush the passer but we can't stop the run to save our life.

That's an interesting point. Don't forget after the SB run, it was presumed all we needed was a better secondary and a LT.  We went out and got 3 CBs after the lovely Vernon Butler pick one of which was a trade up.  Bradberry, Worley, & Sanchez. 

Historically reactionary.  Even the LaFell, Edwards, Gettis draft.  2010 was the worst thing ever in retrospect.  Yuck. 

Edit add: I like the idea of a pure flanker that is ~6'2+ 190 with some speed.  A guy that can outsize CBs but not a pure possession.  There's a handful of talent like that in this draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

With so many schools running wonky systems these days, getting a pro-ready offensive tackle (or OL in general) is tougher than it's ever been.

Used to be you could just about guarantee getting quality OL from certain schools but not so much anymore.

Same thing with WRs. Seems like most WRs coming out of college only run two or three routes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah, a mid-round possession/red zone type WR would make sense.

It seems like this organization has been prone to knee-jerk type overreactions in recent years. We needed size at WR and went overboard with the KB/Funchess twin towers experiment. Then we needed speed at WR, so we went with Moore and Samuel but now we lack size at WR. We couldn't rush the passer last year, so we got rid of all our beef at DE and went pure speed and now we can rush the passer but we can't stop the run to save our life.

The scheme change caused havoc with our run defense, and maybe more importantly our two Pro-Bowl DTs got injured. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • First off, my memory is faulty and so I should remember you. Anyways, welcome back. Having been around here since 2004/2005, I do have to say all these hot takes are not necessary new. I still very much remember all the constant complaints about Jake Delhomme. How he was too inaccurate, fumbled the ball too often, threw bad interceptions, and how Steve Smith deserved a better QB. How this franchise needed to replace Jake for someone better because he dragged everyone down. We even had names for Jake defenders; Blind Delhomme Jock Sniffers (BDJS). That one thread about Chris Weinke over Jake Delhomme because Weinke threw for 423 Yards but only scoring 13 points remains the worst hot takes I've ever seen around here. So to me, it feels like history repeating itself again and I don't feel like getting that much involved in flame wars like I used to. I am more of a sit back and see what the players/team does type of person. And even then, yes, there are so many moving parts that it's not as easy to pinpoint the core issues, especially when you're not inside the building and know every single detail.  And yes, I think even way back then, I hated how overvalued the QB position was and it hasn't gotten much better. It's to where my philosophy has shifted to where if you can't win a SB with a QB on their rookie contract, you might as well get another one. Otherwise, you have to give that QB so much money that the rest of the roster suffers and your window becomes quite narrow.  That's why I'm skeptical that Mahomes/Burrow/Jackson/Allen will win more than one or two SB's between them. None of them look as invisible as they did a few years ago and that's because their targets are much inferior and/or they are getting more roughed up behind a worse O-line.
    • Haha I was still off was thinking of mac jones he has done extremely well this year with basically no weopons as all the 49ers are hurt except for mcaffrey but he is playing slow this year for some reason. 
×
×
  • Create New...