Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tua returning?


Panthercougar68

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Look, we wouldn't get Tua anyhow.  Either the Dolphins or Chargers would sang him first.  Honesly, I think he's damaged goods.  He'd be a younger version of Cam and without an improved OL to protect him either.

That’s the issue. That leaves the Chargers or Miami taking a non QB position. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

I have heard rumblings that he might but I think this hurts the Panthers because it’s 1 less qb taken before 7.

Thoughts?

Why would we want to take Tua anyway? His is injury prone at Alabama with less arm strength, mobility, and expeirence than the QB we already have. 

Suck in 2020 for Fields or Lawrence. Point. Blank. Period. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

That would also mean one of those two teams would likely take Herbert so Hurney wouldn't get any bright ideas.  I think he's VERY overrated.

I like Herbert and believe that with a Head Coach/QB Coach like Mike McCarthy he would be similar to Lawrence at this level. Hell, put Herbert at Clemson and Lawrence at Oregon and you'd probably have the same results as the teams already had. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

I like Herbert and believe that with a Head Coach/QB Coach like Mike McCarthy he would be similar to Lawrence at this level. Hell, put Herbert at Clemson and Lawrence at Oregon and you'd probably have the same results as the teams already had. 

Don't let a Tigers fan see this blasphemy!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FYI (I don't think you are too far off base)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...