Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A change of scenery helped out Tannahill


Hotsauce

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Gipetto said:

Stop pushing cam out. cam is our QB and will continue to be our QB. I’m so fuging sick of the people that want him gone.  He is not going anywhere. STOP IT

Pro tip:

If you don’t want to find yourself triggered, don’t respond to hypothetical threads. No where did I say I want Cam gone nor am I pushing him out (not even sure with my highly regarded status on the Huddle, would I be able to persuade Cam to leave the Panthers anyway). 
 

Just try to take it easy this long offseason man, a lot is gonna happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheRumGone said:

Titans have built a very solid team without good/solid qb play. We are not a very solid team. It won’t be close to the same for any vet looking to come here. We HAVE to build these lines back up.

the Titans were a mediocre team before Tannehill took over. He is a huge part of this resurgence.  Dude is playing MUCH better than I expected

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

the Titans were a mediocre team before Tannehill took over. He is a huge part of this resurgence.  Dude is playing MUCH better than I expected

They have a solid offensive line and a great defense. They needed a solid qb which Tannehill is. We do not have a solid o line or a great defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Forty-Eight said:

It’s funny now until it Schefter breaks the news and Panthers fan start to freak out 

so even in your hypothetical, you didnt consider it a certainty. You just spouse what an obvious reaction would be to something that is highly improbably. Emphasis on highly.

Brady is going to play again next year, no doubt. But he will be suited with a team that has a stellar defense, and nothing going on on offence.

That is literally, what the panthers are not, and bringing in a coordinator has no tie in with your supposed suggestions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Oldmanrivera said:

so even in your hypothetical, you didnt consider it a certainty. You just spouse what an obvious reaction would be to something that is highly improbably. Emphasis on highly.

Brady is going to play again next year, no doubt. But he will be suited with a team that has a stellar defense, and nothing going on on offence.

That is literally, what the panthers are not, and bringing in a coordinator has no tie in with your supposed suggestions.

Did we not have the best pass defense for several weeks? We still have Luke, Shaq, Burns, Reid and even a lazy KK on this team next year. We can rebuild this defense in one offseason + draft. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Forty-Eight said:

Did we not have the best pass defense for several weeks? We still have Luke, Shaq, Burns, Reid and even a lazy KK on this team next year. We can rebuild this defense in one offseason + draft. 

If you were an aged QB, looking for places to hang your last attempt at a superbowl with, do you genuinely think an cordinator for the team you are leaving will talk you into a team on a semi rebuild brink?????

come onnnnnn man

Peyton went into an established defense, not a "well we have these people, ( some of which, on this team, has been questionable by all), but if we do certain things that "might" make the defense better." situation.

He will go to a team, that has already been in discussion of being a good QB away from a bowl. AKA Chicago.

And the irony of that..... they wanted our QB 

fuging lol

 

our D

Luke- it makes more sense to consider his lack of dominance that he is know for, in scheme change, but you have to also consider if it is a downtick in play.

Shaq- A positive in the grand scheme of things, he showed up and played well

Burns- a rookie who started off well, and hasnt done much since.

Reid- ....he has had to consistently recover what the front couldnt do, on their own.

 

Our defense is a wreck right now, rebuildable, but a wreck. There is no effective rebuilding to that defense, that involves Tom Brady

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

They have a solid offensive line and a great defense. They needed a solid qb which Tannehill is. We do not have a solid o line or a great defense.

yeah for sure.  We are much further away than they were.  But that could change in a season, depending on personnel moves.  I doubt it will though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, onmyown said:

Don’t see what you guys are seeing he had an awful game for a playoff qb

titans just have a good team overall

He had what a QB, that has enough around him, to have.

There are QBs that can single handedly win you a game, because they play above the talent offered by the team.

And there are QBs, that can easily win, with a well oiled team.

The binary is simple, but the league today has so many teams succeeding with so many dif types of QB. It really makes it hard to find a defining point to consider the QB as the defining reason, if the only considerations are statuses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Gipetto said:

Stop pushing cam out. cam is our QB and will continue to be our QB. I’m so fuging sick of the people that want him gone.  He is not going anywhere. STOP IT

There is a meaningful difference between people who want Cam out, who do exist, and people who are realistic about the very real possibility he may not be able to perform or stay healthy and thus at some point the wise choice if you're a fan of the team and not just a player would be to move on. Many of these people are Cam fans and it's unfair to lump them in with those that are not. You can both like and support a player and be realistic about his chances of remaining effective on the wrong side of 30 with significant injury history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

There is a meaningful difference between people who want Cam out, who do exist, and people who are realistic about the very real possibility he may not be able to perform or stay healthy and thus at some point the wise choice if you're a fan of the team and not just a player would be to move on. Many of these people are Cam fans and it's unfair to lump them in with those that are not. You can both like and support a player and be realistic about his chances of remaining effective on the wrong side of 30 with significant injury history.

This is as level-headed, non emotional statement of the year that you'll get out of this place.

I am of the belief that Cam, having the most amount of time in his career to recover, can have that translate to stellar play. Oline not considering.

Edit: I've reached a level of inebriation, that I cant edit this post to an acceptable level.

 

Fug the Patriots

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...