Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule: Ideal Situation Needs To Have QB


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, (ATL'ien)CamNewton said:

Drew Brees got healthy again ..

I'm thinking Cam will too if little ole Brees can

Brees gets a roughing call if someone farts in his vicinity. Defenders can try to rip Cams appendages off with no flag.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, (ATL'ien)CamNewton said:

That is going to change. As is how much Cam gets hit.

Cam is going to have better stats yet be doing less heavy lifting, with Rhule.

Have you seen our OL? I kept expecting our QBs severed head to come rolling out of the pile like that scene from Indiana Jones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Squirrel said:

Brees was only injured one season. 

And Cams shoulder will be 100 percent now.  Hell, it was fine the first 2 games of the season this year.  He had a foot injury, which he had surgery to fix.  People are acting like Cam had his right arm amputated or some poo.  He should be ready to go, fully healthy by the time Training Camp rolls around.  Him taking pretty much a year and a half off from the pounding of the NFL, in the middle of his career, could actually turn into a blessing in disguise for him and the team.  You would have to think that Tepper and Rhule himself have high confidence that Cam will be back, or he wouldnt have taken the job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...