Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Huddle Pick'Em Szn 2 CHAMPIONSHIP WK


Bronn

Recommended Posts

Last week, @Khyber53 was our big winner. He got all games correct, and therefore the 10 possible points for the week. He was the only one to pick Tennessee.

1. @FakePlasticTrees, @Datawire, @Mr. Scot, and myself missed one game, and got 6 total points. Baltimore losing killed us all.

2. Somehow the bird is all alone in third, with 5 points awarded.

3. @bigdavis got 4 points.

4. @MHS831 scored 3 points, missing his highest two confidence games.

@Raleigh PF missed the week.

image.png.29898042248e92fc855d87a9f077c578.png

For this week's games, you can make a wager on both games of up to 10 points each based on how confident you are in the result. The hitch is that if you miss the correct pick for that game, you will lose that many points as well.

For example, let's say I wager 10 points on the Chiefs, and 6 points on the Packers:

If the Chiefs lose and the Packers win, I lose 4 points on the week.

If the Chiefs win and the Packers lose, I gain 4 points for the week.

If both teams I chose win, I gain 16 points for the week.

If both teams lose, I lose 16 points for the week.

 

This should really give people a chance to make a competitive jump if they play high risk. I'm only doing 10 points so that it doesn't dilute the accomplishments that people have already obtained during the regular season.

Tiebreakers will be as follows:
Early game (AFC) point total is tiebreaker 1.

Late game (NFC) point total is tiebreaker 2.

 

Good luck everyone!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

Go big or go home, right?

Ten @ KC -- Betting 10 confidence points 53 points total

GB @ SF -- Betting  10 confidence points 48 points total

If you hit on these, you win the crown.  If not, the wall of shame.  I can't help but think Tenn could beat KC.  They already did this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

If you hit on these, you win the crown.  If not, the wall of shame.  I can't help but think Tenn could beat KC.  They already did this season.

Yep. Pretty much in last place already thanks to a missed week (and soooo many bad picks). So, go against the grain and bet big. Honestly, I do think Tennessee picks up another win. I think KC shot their wad last week with the major comeback and the Titans are built to play solid, steady football.

Green Bay, maybe... but it is all on Rodgers isn't it? Tough spot to be in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fug it I am all in too. Let's live on the edge.

TEN @ KC - 10 confidence points, 45 pts total

GB @ SF -  10 confidence points, 37 pts total

Well, FPT's will need to copy my exact predictions like he did last week in order to retain the lead. In doing so, he runs the risk of losing the outright lead completely to someone else that can make some big gains if one (or both) of my picks are wrong. Or go out on his own and take that risk as well.

Bronn will need to have his math game on this weekend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MHS831 said:

So, to razzle and dazzle you guys, I went with Tennessee at the last second to trick you both!

 

HaaHaaaHaaa

Doh! 

2 hours ago, FakePlasticTrees said:

The reason I wait to pick has only to do with the tie breakers, which have bitten my rear numerous times this year. 

Did we even have one last week?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
×
×
  • Create New...