Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We won't allow Cam to show what he can do with innovative offensive coaching?


(ATL'ien)CamNewton

Recommended Posts

Everybody is missing the reality of how football works.

New coach and new OC come in. They look at the signed roster. They are told the FA guys from last year that the GM wants to re-sign. They then meet with the team. They talk individually with all the guys. Based on that and any physical look they might be able to get within NFL rules at this time of year (not sure how that goes, honestly), they decide who they want around.

If Cam and the new staff don't jive, they part ways. It is that simple. If Rhule and Brady just really don't want Cam, then Cam will likely get traded. The reason being, it'll be essentially a lame duck year if there is animosity between coach and QB and that isn't fair to anybody involved.

Having said all that, I honestly don't anticipate it. I know guys who have seen Cam around Charlotte and said that he can be sort of full of himself (he's a young star NFL QB, of course he is. I don't view it as an indictment like some people do), but I honestly feel professionally, Cam will show up and play. Period. If the coaches don't like his play, then that's on them and Cam wouldn't hold any ill will. He'd gracefully leave Charlotte. But I just don't see it happening. Cam's potential upside is far too high. I am, however, completely prepared to see Cam traded because it does fall within the realm of possibility and for good reason, as I have stated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, lightsout said:

Everybody is missing the reality of how football works.

New coach and new OC come in. They look at the signed roster. They are told the FA guys from last year that the GM wants to re-sign. They then meet with the team. They talk individually with all the guys. Based on that and any physical look they might be able to get within NFL rules at this time of year (not sure how that goes, honestly), they decide who they want around.

If Cam and the new staff don't jive, they part ways. It is that simple. If Rhule and Brady just really don't want Cam, then Cam will likely get traded. The reason being, it'll be essentially a lame duck year if there is animosity between coach and QB and that isn't fair to anybody involved.

Having said all that, I honestly don't anticipate it. I know guys who have seen Cam around Charlotte and said that he can be sort of full of himself (he's a young star NFL QB, of course he is. I don't view it as an indictment like some people do), but I honestly feel professionally, Cam will show up and play. Period. If the coaches don't like his play, then that's on them and Cam wouldn't hold any ill will. He'd gracefully leave Charlotte. But I just don't see it happening. Cam's potential upside is far too high. I am, however, completely prepared to see Cam traded because it does fall within the realm of possibility and for good reason, as I have stated.

Good write up. but do you see Cam playing on a 1 year contract?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Squirrel said:

Good write up. but do you see Cam playing on a 1 year contract?  


Cam has no leverage. He'd be seen as too much of an issue by the new regime if he refused to play out his final year since he has played 10 games in two seasons due to injury. He has to prove that he can still produce AND stay healthy at this point. If he balls out, Cam is getting PAID next off season. If he doesn't, we move on from him and he might get signed by a team in need for a QB on a three to five year deal somewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Harbingers said:

Cam can’t throw quick passes.


I'd argue the exact opposite. I always went nuts trying to figure out why we didn't throw slants when we had Funchess because it was almost always automatic assuming Funch caught it. Cam can throw the quick pass, and I think he'd benefit gratefully in the kind of system NO runs. Tons of quick passes with the occasional shot down field. Before he got injured two seasons ago, he was executing that minus nailing the long ball. Having the shoulder fixed, maybe that deep ball is back.

Imagine Cam throwing those slants and deep ins to DJ and Curtis. Brady's offense is literally designed around those levels concepts and flood concepts. Those are Cam's strengths.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Cam can’t throw quick passes.

I don't agree... Cam was very good at getting the ball out quickly on short routes early in 2018.  He also still had the ability to deliver the ball accurately deep early in 2018...  But that faded with his shoulder health.

At times in his career Cam has lacked touch on his short balls that made them hard to catch.  But he improved on that for 2018 IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bobsfoodbasics said:

Just because you have only seen Cam play in an antiquated offense, doesn't mean he can't play in a modern offense.

Norv and Shula's trash offense was exactly that, trash.

Playing devil's advocate for a minute.  But Cam couldn't even get the plays off in time. What makes you think he can quickly release the ball. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...