Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

[Rapoport] Panthers Moving RB Coach Jake Peetz To QB Coach


bobsfoodbasics

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He actually has more experience as a QB coach than he does as a RB coach. He had never previously been a RB coach until we gave him the job. He's previously been a QB coach at Alabama and for the Raiders. 

Total of three years, two of which were as an assistant quarterback coach. He has only one year in a full time role.

We interviewed three guys that were far more experienced and had successful track records. Plus the idea of keeping Peetz in the first place was that he was so good with McCaffrey.

This is not a move I understand at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Total of three years, two of which were as an assistant quarterback coach. He has only one year in a full time role.

We interviewed three guys that were far more experienced and had successful track records. Plus the idea of keeping Peetz in the first place was that he was so good with McCaffrey.

This is not a move I understand at all.

I don't care what a guy has done, I care about what he can do. Everyone has to work their way up the ranks. I'd rather have a young, hungry, ambitious guy working his ass off than a retread cashing a check living off of reputation and past successes.

I'm never going to freak out about a position coach hire. The Vince Lombardis of the world aren't pounding down the door begging for a position coach gig. LOL!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Total of three years, two of which were as an assistant quarterback coach. He has only one year in a full time role.

We interviewed three guys that were far more experienced and had successful track records. Plus the idea of keeping Peetz in the first place was that he was so good with McCaffrey.

This is not a move I understand at all.

You don't understand the move of moving a guy into a position he has more experience.  Specifically with using the RPO?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't care what a guy has done, I care about what he can do. Everyone has to work their way up the ranks. I'd rather have a young, hungry, ambitious guy working his ass off than a retread cashing a check living off of reputation and past successes.

Like Ken Dorsey?

We could have at least placed a phone call to Jim Caldwell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Total of three years, two of which were as an assistant quarterback coach. He has only one year in a full time role.

We interviewed three guys that were far more experienced and had successful track records. Plus the idea of keeping Peetz in the first place was that he was so good with McCaffrey.

This is not a move I understand at all.

I get the impression its more of a staff shuffle to make everyone fit considering the fact that I think Brady will be the *actual* QB coach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He had to take a medical leave of absence all last season.

Still, he has interest now. There's speculation he could join the Eagles.

Also worth noting: Remember when we hired Lance Taylor and picked McCaffrey?

We just put in a QB coach that has plenty of experience with Tua Tagovailoa.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Malcom Spence is the best player remaining, hope he’s there.
    • The era that you played in, and, more importantly, who you played with actually matters. Honestly, that's why these issues will be debated forever, as it's just difficult to say that this person or that person is better when you're discussing the passage of time. As for me, after Rice, Moss and maybe Megatron and T.O., there's probably a dozen or so guys that can be argued about to the cows come home. Personally, I'm not putting Fitz, Harrison, Johnson, Evans, or especially D-Hop, Jefferson, Chase or Hill definitely in front of Smitty (and Colston ain't even in the discussion). Context and all that stuff actually matters. Things like the triple crown matter. 
    • Some of those guys? Yeah honestly you can.  I would 100% take Steve Smith over Larry Fitzgerald, Harrison, even Mike Evans. He is 100% a better player than those guys in his prime. If you look at the numbers Smith is historically under targeted in comparison to his contemporaries. He was only targeted 150 times or more only once in his career. Fitzgerald for example was targeted well above that 9 different seasons. Had Smith played with Peyton, Brady, Greatest Show on Turf, or even with Warner in Arizona he would broken records. His 2008 season was ridiculous accumulating 1400 yards in 13 games on less than 80 receptions. All time he also lost a season due to injury in 04, barely played WR as a rookie. Got robbed of 1k season with Clausen. Thats easily another 1800yds minimum that should have been tacked on to his #s. The only guys I’d say for certain are better than Smith are Rice, Moss, TO, Megatron, Julio Jones, Antonio Brown.
×
×
  • Create New...