Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The staff as we know it...


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, pantherclaw said:

Should have been expected by ALL whom were wanting a coaching change, and by anybody else once Rivera was fired. 

I remember quite a few folks saying before Rivera was fired some version of “I would rather suck for a few years if it meant getting us out of this never ending mediocrity.” I was one of them. I’m still fully willing to suck for a while. What will be interesting is how many of those folks are willing to stick with it vs how many will bail at the first sign of awful under the new regime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

I remember quite a few folks saying before Rivera was fired some version of “I would rather suck for a few years if it meant getting us out of this never ending mediocrity.” I was one of them. I’m still fully willing to suck for a while. What will be interesting is how many of those folks are willing to stick with it vs how many will bail at the first sign of awful under the new regime.

As with any wholesale coaching changes, patience must be exercised. The problem with that, is fans aren't very patient.

After all, Little is already a bust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

I remember quite a few folks saying before Rivera was fired some version of “I would rather suck for a few years if it meant getting us out of this never ending mediocrity.” I was one of them. I’m still fully willing to suck for a while. What will be interesting is how many of those folks are willing to stick with it vs how many will bail at the first sign of awful under the new regime.

Richardson wasn't. He was ready to fire Rivera two years in before Marty fell on the sword.

Also worth remembering that we've got additional incentive to hope this stuff succeeds given that our head coach doesn't believe in firing assistants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Richardson wasn't. He was ready to fire Rivera two years in before Marty fell on the sword.

Also worth remembering that we've got additional incentive to hope this stuff succeeds given that our head coach doesn't believe in firing assistants.

Meh. I’m retaining some healthy skepticism about that “I don’t believe in firing coaches.” line. Let’s see if he still feels that way if his seat gets warm in a few years. Might suddenly have a change of heart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 1of10Charnatives said:

Meh. I’m retaining some healthy skepticism about that “I don’t believe in firing coaches.” line. Let’s see if he still feels that way if his seat gets warm in a few years. Might suddenly have a change of heart.

Outside of being ridiculously successful from day one, I don't really think it's a sustainable model, and I'd like to believe he's going to figure that out.

The other alternative, of course, is that Tepper steps in and fires people for him. That's not exactly an ideal scenario either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

To a point.

Remember when everybody went nuts trying to find the next Sean McVay while the Colts instead smartly hired Frank Reich?

NFL front offices are often notoriously unimaginative, tending to run with the idea that whatever worked for the last team that had success is sure to work for them too, even if they don't see the bigger picture.

Like I said, hope like hell it works out, but I have concerns. And yeah, I'd feel a lot better with an experienced NFL head coach on staff.

Ah yes, Frank Reich, he of the *checks notes* 18-16 overall HC record. 

And before you say Luck retiring has an effect on that record, yeah, duh. Luck also had more to do with that 10-6 record in Reich's first year too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, UNCrules2187 said:

Ah yes, Frank Reich, he of the *checks notes* 18-16 overall HC record. 

And before you say Luck retiring has an effect on that record, yeah, duh. Luck also had more to do with that 10-6 record in Reich's first year too.

What's the record of the other guys?

Outside of Matt LaFleur, it ain't good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

What's the record of the other guys?

Outside of Matt LaFleur, it ain't good.

Other guys being Matt LaFleur (who you noted, went 14-4 and had a postseason bye) and Zac Taylor who, yes, went 2-14, but for a team that was clearly tanking and now has the #1 pick and in line to select who could be the next generational talent at QB? Who else is there? And to be fair, all of these guys, McVay included, are actually part of the Shanahan coaching tree.

edit: And if you include Kliff Kingsbury, he's also an NFL HC rookie that was working with a rookie QB. Bottom line, if you're expecting anything more than 4-5 wins this coming year (especially if Cam is gone), you're expecting too much, and I'm willing to bet that'd be the case whether we hired a college HC or a veteran NFL coordinator. There is simply not enough talent on this team short-term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mjligon said:

Outside of Rhule and Brady that’s a whole lot of meh

You sound like the guy in high school that went after the popular girls with loose gaping holes because collectively they are considered attractive and popular by everyone, yet you pass up the cute quiet girl with glasses that wears a sweater that ends up being smoking hot and a great personality, and didn't have 50 dicks pounding her brains out. 

 

all coaches need a starting point. All great coaches were brand new at one point, no names buried on a staff.  Sometimes a "name" or what looks good "on paper" ends up being old and rotten. We have a lot of new, young, unproven blood that could end up developing into quite the innovative staff we need. 

 

I think we should give Rhule the benefit of the doubt, and see if he can start and build his own dynasty off of his own risks and intuitions. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thank God DM used that #8 pick on a bona fide WR1 and not some bum pass rushing prospect like Stewart or someone else. I believe Tet is legit WR1 material and going forward will be our long term answer at that position since we desperately were in need of one once they traded away DJ Moore.  Tet could possibly end up even being better long term than someone who I respect a ton as a WR in Moore. Evans has been a pleasant surprise and great TE/FB depth piece going forward who could make the most of his opportunities.  Any good offense worth a damn in the NFL has 3 TEs that can do multiple things and being scared by Ian Thomas play for years should makes us all appreciate what Evans is quietly doing as a ROOKIE at one of the hardest positions to learn at the pro level.  Keep cooking DM. This season is not over obviously but seeing some growth out of young talent finally is a breathe of fresh fuggin air for once. 
    • Saw this show up in my new feed. Nice to see a couple of our rookies making it into the top 5 so far, even if it is a pff measure... From https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-top-15-rookies-week-9-2025 ... 4. TE Mitchell Evans, Carolina Panthers (78.7) Evans struggled in the Panthers’ tight win over the Packers, finishing with a 41.8 PFF overall grade — third worst among tight ends this week. He was not targeted in the game and played only one snap in pass protection. He did log 15 run-blocking snaps, and although he earned a 68.9 PFF run-blocking grade in zone looks (seven snaps), his 39.0 mark in gap schemes (second worst for the week) dragged him down to a 46.6 PFF run-blocking grade overall — sixth worst for the week. Despite seeing zero targets over his past two games, Evans still leads the Carolina tight end group with a 74.3 PFF receiving grade. He has caught all nine of his targets for 90 yards, six first downs and two touchdowns. Evans also leads the Panthers’ tight end group in PFF run-blocking grade (72.2). He has recorded a 20.5% positive play rate across 175 snaps.  5. WR Tetairoa McMillan, Carolina Panthers (78.6) McMillan had a better day against the Packers, recording four catches for 46 yards. Most of that production came in the first quarter via two 16-yard catches — one of which he snatched from Carrington Valentine’s hands, who was in perfect position to break up the pass. McMillan accounted for three first downs on the day, although Green Bay was able to limit his impact after the catch, holding him to 0.8 yards after the catch per reception. McMillan now has 41 catches for 558 yards — a top-15 mark. He is also tied for second with 19 explosive gains of 15-plus yards. Three of McMillan’s catches against the Packers came between the numbers, bringing him to 22 for 318 yards and 19 first downs (tied for second most) this season. He owns a 26.1% threat rate and a 76.6 PFF receiving grade between the numbers. He also ranks in the top 10 in explosive gains (10) and yards after the catch per reception (5.5) within that area of the field. 
    • At least we don't need to hear overreacting about towels ...
×
×
  • Create New...