Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Offensive Line


DaveThePanther2008

Recommended Posts

I'm not here to argue whether we should or shouldn't draft a LT. My opinion is we'll draft Brown if he is available. 

I think Daley and Little have shown enough promise to fill that need at OT.

The main reason for this post is. How much do you attribute our OLine performance to continuity? When you shuffle players around and around it is difficult to gel together. 

I am in agreement about Paradis wasn't the answer at center. It should tell us just how good Kalil was. Maybe he couldn't make the right calls in protection. 

Taylor and Moton are a good start. Daley and Little have potential. IMO it's not as bad as some think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its seems silly to me to give up on Greg Little (notably raw coming out of college, needing coaching) After one rookie season with a concussion issue and a coach fired mid season, that you traded up in the 2nd for. That seems incredibly short sighted to me. There were a ton of factors pitted against a raw rookie, and he still showed promise at a position that rookies tend to struggle even with the best circumstances. 

 

 

We gotta give this guy a better shot than that. Let Rhule and his army of coaches get a hold of him and coach him up. We actually have young potential at the OT position. 

 

Go draft a position where theres a huge need, AND theres no young potential. AKA Defensive Line, specifically DT.  

 

if we MUST upgrade left tackle RIGHT NOW, do it via free agency. Drafting another rookie OT that will require coaching to combat a learning curve is not the short term answer many of you want.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

Its seems silly to me to give up on Greg Little (notably raw coming out of college, needing coaching) After one rookie season with a concussion issue and a coach fired mid season, that you traded up in the 2nd for. That seems incredibly short sighted to me. There were a ton of factors pitted against a raw rookie, and he still showed promise at a position that rookies tend to struggle even with the best circumstances. 

 

 

We gotta give this guy a better shot than that. Let Rhule and his army of coaches get a hold of him and coach him up. We actually have young potential at the OT position. 

 

Go draft a position where theres a huge need, AND theres no young potential. AKA Defensive Line, specifically DT.  

 

if we MUST upgrade left tackle RIGHT NOW, do it via free agency. Drafting another rookie OT that will require coaching to combat a learning curve is not the short term answer many of you want.   

You can also add Daley to that learning curve.  Give him time at guard and he'll have some game time experience should he have to slide to tackle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is sensible.  People who are throwing Little under the bus already do not understand how long it takes an OT to develop. I disagree with the concept of bringing in a vet to play LT--this is a great time to develop players--something RR did only when he was forced to do so,

If Thomas is there, however, you still take him if you think he is the next Jordan Gross. Why?  Moton is in a contract year and he has been average at RT.  Both Little and Daley can play G.  Van Roten is a free agent and Turner is a big contract with inconsistent results.  You solidify the LT spot if you can and then you worry about the rest. Little has some mechanical issues to overcome--if he does, he has all the tools. Daley flashed in college, but he might be a better LG.  If we get rid of Turner, Little would be an ideal RG.   I would not give up on Moton--the best OL we have. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, The Huddler said:

Its seems silly to me to give up on Greg Little (notably raw coming out of college, needing coaching) After one rookie season with a concussion issue and a coach fired mid season, that you traded up in the 2nd for. That seems incredibly short sighted to me. There were a ton of factors pitted against a raw rookie, and he still showed promise at a position that rookies tend to struggle even with the best circumstances. 

 

 

We gotta give this guy a better shot than that. Let Rhule and his army of coaches get a hold of him and coach him up. We actually have young potential at the OT position. 

 

Go draft a position where theres a huge need, AND theres no young potential. AKA Defensive Line, specifically DT.  

 

if we MUST upgrade left tackle RIGHT NOW, do it via free agency. Drafting another rookie OT that will require coaching to combat a learning curve is not the short term answer many of you want.   

Normally I’m in favor of being more patient with rookies and I agree Little and Daily have shown some potential. The key word there is some. They have not shown otherworldly potential. Acquiring a starting LT in free agency is put simply not a viable option for the same reason acquiring a franchise Qb the same way is not. Healthy, effective starting LT’s do not hit FA in their prime but once in a blue moon.

The line must be fixed NOW, not whenever Hurney feels like getting around to it, which for a long time was never. Cam is going into his 30’s with significant injury history. I agree that Paradis needs to be replaced but LT is the most important pass pro position. Keep in mind that to be okay with sticking with Daily and Little for now is to be okay with exposing Cam to sub par blind side protection while we wait for them to HOPEFULLY develop beyond just potential. 

In this specific situation, I’m not okay with that. When your house is actively on fire is not the time to be cool with VFD rookies showing up and learning on the job. You need someone who can do the job effectively NOW. I think everyone who wants to see Cam play here beyond just next year should consider fixing LT our most important AND urgent need.

At present the most viable option for that appears to be Andrew Thomas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was an article on Paradis, i think it was Riot Report, talking about how the Panthers were using Paradis.  Basically saying that the coaches were not giving him a chance to get his hands up after snapping the ball.  Other teams use their guards, and we instead had our guards helping our tackles.  Bad coaching may have attributed to many of our oline miscues

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

Normally I’m in favor of being more patient with rookies and I agree Little and Daily have shown some potential. The key word there is some. They have not shown otherworldly potential. Acquiring a starting LT in free agency is put simply not a viable option for the same reason acquiring a franchise Qb the same way is not. Healthy, effective starting LT’s do not hit FA in their prime but once in a blue moon.

The line must be fixed NOW, not whenever Hurney feels like getting around to it, which for a long time was never. Cam is going into his 30’s with significant injury history. I agree that Paradis needs to be replaced but LT is the most important pass pro position. Keep in mind that to be okay with sticking with Daily and Little for now is to be okay with exposing Cam to sub par blind side protection while we wait for them to HOPEFULLY develop beyond just potential. 

In this specific situation, I’m not okay with that. When your house is actively on fire is not the time to be cool with VFD rookies showing up and learning on the job. You need someone who can do the job effectively NOW.

At present the most viable option for that appears to be Andrew Thomas.

I see your point, but in Little's case, we just do not know what he would be like with some reps--the concussions are a major concern, and in my opinion, directly related to his mechanical flaws---he is a waist bender and that puts your head on a tee.  DE's are trained to club that head if it becomes a leverage point.  Aside from being a balance issue, keeping your head back is a vision and safety issue as well.

We do not know what we have in him because is not mechanically disciplined.  That could necessitate a move inside to G or retirement.  However, any rookie is going to be a project.  Gross did not come in as a stud LT--played RT rather poorly for a season, having Peppers eat his lunch at practice.  Still, rebuilding a team means learning in the trenches.  If Thomas is the best player, I would take him.  Little and Daley can find work on the OL at the other 4 spots---but I think OT is not our biggest need--when we have KK Short and nobody at DT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

There was an article on Paradis, i think it was Riot Report, talking about how the Panthers were using Paradis.  Basically saying that the coaches were not giving him a chance to get his hands up after snapping the ball.  Other teams use their guards, and we instead had our guards helping our tackles.  Bad coaching may have attributed to many of our oline miscues

That is interesting.  I heard one OL coach at a conference say this, and it stuck.  Take it for what it is worth--but he was an OL coach at S Carolina, I think.  He said, "You can have 1 weak OL if the other 4 are good.   If you have 2 weak OL you are in for a long season.  The help factor was his point.  A TE can chip, a RB/FB can help.  You use him to double, etc.  Lat year, we had three poor lineman from C to LT.  Disaster.  How that impacted Paradis?  I;d need to watch some videos, but that is an interesting point.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As painful as it may be, I’m perfectly willing to suck against the run next year if it is the difference between Cam only playing next year for us or being our qb for another five years at least, and in my mind solving LT is the single biggest thing the team can do with regards to that. As I’ve argued before sucking against the run next year only impacts next year. Crap oline protection next year could have an impact on our qb situation that lasts for years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

Normally I’m in favor of being more patient with rookies and I agree Little and Daily have shown some potential. The key word there is some. They have not shown otherworldly potential. Acquiring a starting LT in free agency is put simply not a viable option for the same reason acquiring a franchise Qb the same way is not. Healthy, effective starting LT’s do not hit FA in their prime but once in a blue moon.

The line must be fixed NOW, not whenever Hurney feels like getting around to it, which for a long time was never. Cam is going into his 30’s with significant injury history. I agree that Paradis needs to be replaced but LT is the most important pass pro position. Keep in mind that to be okay with sticking with Daily and Little for now is to be okay with exposing Cam to sub par blind side protection while we wait for them to HOPEFULLY develop beyond just potential. 

In this specific situation, I’m not okay with that. When your house is actively on fire is not the time to be cool with VFD rookies showing up and learning on the job. You need someone who can do the job effectively NOW. I think everyone who wants to see Cam play here beyond just next year should consider fixing LT our most important AND urgent need.

At present the most viable option for that appears to be Andrew Thomas.

A super talented rookie OT even with the best circumstances statistically aren't going to be that instant fix you want for next season 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

A super talented rookie OT even with the best circumstances statistically aren't going to be that instant fix you want for next season 

The question isn't whether the best rookie OT will be a pro bowler out of the gate, the question is are they likely to be an upgrade over what we can reasonably expect from Little/Daily. I think the answer to that is yes, therefore I'm in favor of drafting OT, because I feel the problem is both accute and urgent, and this is the best solution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the problems last year was depth at the lines .  We had a serious drop off when a player went down .  Bring in talent and let them compete knowing there is talent behind them . Don't shuffle them around , let them know one position and get used to the players beside them .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, The Huddler said:

Its seems silly to me to give up on Greg Little (notably raw coming out of college, needing coaching) After one rookie season with a concussion issue and a coach fired mid season, that you traded up in the 2nd for. That seems incredibly short sighted to me. There were a ton of factors pitted against a raw rookie, and he still showed promise at a position that rookies tend to struggle even with the best circumstances. 

 

 

We gotta give this guy a better shot than that. Let Rhule and his army of coaches get a hold of him and coach him up. We actually have young potential at the OT position. 

 

Go draft a position where theres a huge need, AND theres no young potential. AKA Defensive Line, specifically DT.  

 

if we MUST upgrade left tackle RIGHT NOW, do it via free agency. Drafting another rookie OT that will require coaching to combat a learning curve is not the short term answer many of you want.   

There's a lot of wisdom here. I'd still be in favor of drafting a center early.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

There's a lot of wisdom here. I'd still be in favor of drafting a center early.

This is not going to be well received by some considering the state of our defense, but if we draft Thomas in the first, a solid center prospect in the 2nd, and dip into that super deep WR class in the third I’ll be thrilled.

Id be in favor of doing that this year, plug what holes you can in the D with FA, then next draft zero in on your D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is something that has irritated me for a while. I'm going to address his play during these "game winning drives," 8 of them apparently, clear up some nomenclature, and address some points specifically. The games in question.  Also responding to this  What is a Game Winning Drive? This is an undefined term and therefore can be whatever the person using it wants it to be. The term itself removes context from a result which lends itself to be used by people arguing in bad faith. Some people like to attribute every time Bryce is on the field in a situation like this to him "winning the game," or just kind of associating him with a "Game Winning Drive" and leaving it open ended. There's no criteria for what a GWD is. If you had a spectrum of what this could encompass it, on one end you'd have a single player being responsible, and on the other you'd have all 11. Put another way, a QB going 9/9 for 99 yards and rushing the final yard himself is on one end of the spectrum, and on the other is the blocking tight end who was just kinda there. Hey, he was on the field too.  For these purposes, I'm going to hedge and say a GWD is something you know when you see it. I'm not going to claim Bryce hasn't had one, but I'm absolutely not going to give him credit for every one of them. Reasonable people can disagree at the margins, but generally I think we'll be in accord more than not. I also want to look at the context of these, because I think we need to keep in mind how the team got to that position. There's a certain "mystique" about the term game winning drive. Like all of a sudden, when the game is on the line, the QB just turns it on and becomes a better player and blah blah blah. Nothing else matters because he Just Wins Games It neatly ignores the circumstances that led to a team needing a last second drive against some of the worst teams in the league, and this should be taken into consideration. This was an argument made in favor of Delhomme for years...until a certain game that we won't mention.  In reality, defenses are tired by the end of the game, defensive coordinators will generally give up yards in exchange for clock, and offensive playcallers will be more aggressive. That's really it.  But Fiz, why now? Why tonight? People are building this narrative about Bryce Young because it allows them to overlook the rest of his performance, his role in getting the team into whatever hole they're trying to crawl out of, and minimizing the contributions of everyone else (or assigning blame to players other than him) to make him look like he's better than he is/being let down. People in the national media with motivations I can only speculate on are doing this and it's irritating. Also it's very slow at work tonight and it's either this or reruns of ER.  I'll be looking at the final drives here (more or less) when the Panthers were in a position to win or tie. I'll also be adding some context as a I go. So lets just look at these.  2023 Houston at Carolina - 5/10 41 yds, FG  The Panthers drove to the Houston 44, then ran it 6 times in a row for the final 12 yards before the Texans started diving offsides. Panthers weren't just killing clock; Bryce had already taken one sack on the drive (six on the day!), and I don't think any of us feel like Pineiro had a 60 yarder in him in 2023. He did have 5 FG in him though, which is all the scoring the Panthers could muster. It was enough.  Game Winning Drive: eh, Bryce didn't really cover himself in glory here. If you think getting the team into range for a 60 yard attempt before letting the RB finish the job is a GWD, then we're going to have some problems. I'm generally kinda dubious of the whole "wow he set up a long range field goal for the win what a legend." Why yes early career Tom Brady was a fraud carried by Adam Vinatieri why do you ask  Atlanta at Carolina - 5/6 53 yds, GW FG Game Winning Drive: yeah, I think so. It was a miserable 9-6 win against the Desmond Ridder led Atlanta Falcons. Prior to this final drive, Bryce was a whopping 13/18 for 114 yds and the offense had managed 6 whole points. Hard for me to say here they weren't in the position to need a GWD because of how ineffective Bryce was. That said, I think it's fair he did this one on his own. Credit where credit's due little guy, you did it.  2024 New Orleans at Carolina - 1/4, 38 yds Game Winning Drive: not really. Panthers win 23-22. Sanders scored from 16 yards out on the ground, Carolina was only there because of a DPI (a theme with Bryce), Bryce took a sack on the 2 point conversion, and then the defense stopped the Saints afterwards. Prior to this Bryce had a very Bryce esque 15/22 133 1 Td 1 Int performance going so he was just kinda there.  Again, this is where context comes into play. Completing 1/4 passes does not "leading a game winning drive" make. If that's the dividing line, everyone on the field led a GWD, so the term becomes meaningless.  Carolina at Giants - 0/0  Game Winning Drive: no matter what a GWD is, it's certainly not this, and if anyone argues differently you can disregard them. Daniel Jones fumbled on the first play of overtime, Panthers ran a couple times and kicked the game winning FG. Prior to this, Bryce was terrible. Panthers were up 17-7 with 5:31 in the 3rd quarter, on the back of Chuba. From that point on, Bryce went 2/6 for 14 yards. Panthers had two 3 and outs and got just 2 first downs. Panthers overcame him here.  Arizona at Carolina - 0/0 Game Winning Drive: no. On the panthers second possession in overtime, Chuba ran it twice for 49 yards and a TD. On their first possession, Bryce completed a 1 yard checkdown, took a sack, and the Panthers punted after totaling -4 yards. Furthermore, Bryce couldn't convert a 3rd and 3 at the 2 minute warning up 3 points. Arizona got the ball back and tied the game.  Carolina at Atlanta - 5/5, 71 yards  Game Winning Drive: sure whatever have a day. For context, it's generally accepted in Atlanta sports media the defense was trying get the coordinator fired that day, which he was. I was at the game. I'm not saying the players had a conspiracy, but I'm not sure how it would look different if they did. but hey, as long as weird poo keeps happening against the Falcons, let it ride.  Miami at Carolina - 3/5, 45 yards, TD  Game Winning Drive: yes BUT. I don't want to re-litigate this. Briefly, the Dolphins have a historically bad defense, the Panthers were only trailing because of how badly Bryce played, the defense bailed the team out, and Rico was clearly the MVP. Trying to sneak this into a narrative about Bryce and his game winning drives is an attempt to hide how completely dogshit he was for most of the game. On second half drives to start, Bryce went.... 0/1 passing, took a sack, FG 2/3 passing, 18 yards, Delay of Game on Bryce, punt 2/2 passing, 16 yards, took a sack, punt  1/3 passing, 4 yards, punt  1/1 passing, 4 yds, 2 defensive penalties, 43 yd run by Rico, 1 yd TD run Absolutely dismal performance Dallas at Carolina - 3/6, 25 yards, FG  Game Winning Drive: Panthers had 34 yards rushing on this drive, and Rico rushed for more yards on the day than Bryce threw. People will want to point to the 7 yard slant to Renfrow, but that's one moment. Why do you need a 4th down conversion to kick a game winning FG against the worst defense in the league? The Renfrow catch is just as meaningful as the DPI (again) on 3rd and 7. Hard for me to say yeah Bryce gets credit for this and Rico doesn't. or Ryan Fitzgerald. People aren't going to be telling stories about where they were when Bryce got 25 yards passing to set up a 30 yard FG to beat the worst defense in the league.  Conclusion I'd say low end 3, high end 6 for what I'd actually credit Bryce for with having a game winning drive. Absolutely not for the Giants and Cardinals game. Saints game probably not.  As far as questioning which games need a GWD because of Bryce, I'd argue Miami, New York, 2023 Atlanta, and Houston definitely. League average QB play and you don't need the heroics. Bryce had multiple chances to seal the game against the Cardinals in 2024 and couldn't do it. The defense picked off the Cardinals late in the 4th quarter at their 11 yard line after the Panthers went 3 and out, including a classic Bryce check down short of the line to gain on 3rd.  About half of the time, it looks like these GWD, whomever is responsible for them, are happening in part because of what Bryce did or didn't do. I don't think league average QB play is too much to ask for. Panthers usually win these games despite of Bryce; he's an obstacle to be overcome.  Stats Taken in totality, in these situations Bryce's stats are  7 games 17/26 passing for 233, 1 TD  65% completion rating  13 ypc 8.9 ypa I'm not going to compare this to league average, I'm just going to point out you'd expect someone with 8 GWD to have more than 1 TD.  Other side of this  but what about the games in a similar situation where they DIDN'T win? Shouldn't we look at those games too? Maybe find ones where Bryce absolutely lost the game with a pick, or calling an audible into the wrong play, or spiking the ball with zero seconds on the clock after throwing into the middle of the field, or all of the turnover on downs? Maybe also go into some of the games that have been mythologized, like the Eagles game that ended on a turnover on downs where Bryce had 3rd and 4 in Eagles territory and couldn't get a first down? Yeah...someone should do that...
    • Best RB tandem in Panther history (at least for a few weeks)
×
×
  • Create New...