Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Latest CBA Update


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, King K. Rhule said:

yeah the playoff thing sucks, but Ill live with it because at the end of the day, I want nothing more than the Panthers winning the Superbowl. Every teams odds increase with this new format.

If more teams are in the playoffs, then any one team's odds of making the playoffs go up. Their odds of winning the super bowl with additional teams in however, go down.

For comparison, the odds of any one college basketball team winning the national championship no matter how good are small, because they have to win 6 (hypothetically potentially even 7) games to do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not think any team should get a bye-the advantage is getting to play the #8 seed (if they go with 16) in the first round at home.  A bye gives the best team a "win" and a week of rest.  I think home field and the easiest first round opponent is enough of an advantage.

Just my thinking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MHS831 said:

I do not think any team should win a bye-the advantage is getting to play the #8 seed (if they go with 16) in the first round at home.  A bye gives the best team a "win" and a week of rest.  I think home field and the easiest first round opponent is enough of an advantage.

Just my thinking

I think the last time I saw somebody run the numbers, the math showed bye teams win over 70% of their first playoff games. which IIRC is something like 10% MORE of a mathematical advantage than regular season home field. As currently constructed the bye is an overwhelming advantage for what amounts to typically a single win or two or a tie breaker advantage over other division winners. It's too much advantage for too little difference in performance most of the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Waldo said:

They need to expand the roster by 5 and keep the 5 inactives. I would be more caring about the playoffs but I don't think that is a problem we have to deal with anytime soon. 

I've never understood why NFL owners are willing to pay 5 guys NFL minimum salaries that can't wear a jersey on game day. Also I think owners would be fine with expanding rosters since what they're negotiating is the piece of the pie all players combined get, but the existing players union might not be super keen on adding five roster spots if they don't think it materially reduces the burden on starters who play the majority of reps if not injured anyway. They may view that as watering down their slice of the pie for marginal return. Hard to say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 1of10Charnatives said:

I've never understood why NFL owners are willing to pay 5 guys NFL minimum salaries that can't wear a jersey on game day. Also I think owners would be fine with expanding rosters since what they're negotiating is the piece of the pie all players combined get, but the existing players union might not be super keen on adding five roster spots if they don't think it materially reduces the burden on starters who play the majority of reps if not injured anyway. They may view that as watering down their slice of the pie for marginal return. Hard to say.

I agree with you on why both sides wouldn't do it. If they add another game to the year and keep up the idiotic Thursday night games, they really should. Football is a game where some guys just are not ready or just can't go but are not to the IR point. There is the whole strategy of the 5 inactives announced right before the game but I don't find it very entertaining to watch a game where injuries kill the competitiveness because they don't have the roster spots and the players aren't hurt enough for IR. The last 5 guys on any roster aren't costing much, I don't know why they are so stuck to those specific numbers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, King K. Rhule said:

yeah the playoff thing sucks, but Ill live with it because at the end of the day, I want nothing more than the Panthers winning the Superbowl. Every teams odds increase with this new format.

Exactly 3.125% of the teams in the league win the Super Bowl every year (1 of 32).  The odds aren't changing because of extra teams in the playoffs.  You could however argue that the odds for the best team to NOT win have increased.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, heelsnum1 said:

Exactly 3.125% of the teams in the league win the Super Bowl every year (1 of 32).  The odds aren't changing because of extra teams in the playoffs.  You could however argue that the odds for the best team to NOT win have increased.

You could argue that with only one team getting a bye that the odds for the best team to win increased. The best team would have the best conference record. Since over 70% of SB champions have had a bye, that’s important and now only the best team gets it. This change would absolutely be a bigger advantage for the 1 seed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean you can always talk good or bad in just about everything. 8 wins and leading poo mountain, this rookie class is a big reason. Think about no Tmac or Dan Morgan didn't make that trade to gain a future 2nd rounder. So after Pat Jones breaks his back, DJ " who's not on any roster or PS" Johnson would be starting. Gods knows how bad they already are- 32nd in sacks/pressure/PDs etc... Sure Prince, Trevor, Cam, and little Jimmy haven't done too much, but they are still here.  Honestly its not smart or wise to judge rookies, *unless pro-bowl or cut. Lets revisit this next year, there are slump sophomore years and the biggest jump in players careers most times happens in the 2nd full off-season. You see who wants to be NFL pro and who's happy with teppers checks. I know many of them will be getting surgeries, got to see how they attack that as well....Tmac is playing hurt currently, if they were out of the race, he would be IR'd and maybe half the rookie class as well....I thought Cam was headed for the IR. 
    • It actually looks pretty solid.  A few players to re-sign and three primary positions to upgrade (starters).  Beyond that, we don't have a bunch of holes or need to overpay free agents. this is how I see it (using OTC for the 2026 roster information) on December 22, 2025.  This is rather basic, focusing on the core needs. Blue: Potential players to re-sign in the offseason.  Green: Players under contract for the 2026 season.  Italics: Possible cap casualties Analysis   Offense:  Center:  First, sign Mays for the long term (He is 26–I’d give him a 3-4 year deal).  He is not great, but he is decent and we need consistency on the OL. He does not make stupid mistakes. While the draft is not great in the interior offensive line, signing a veteran who can backup G and C would be a strategy.   Guard:  Canalas seemed to be impressed with Curhan, as I was.  He will be 28 next year, so he has a few years in him. I think he comes cheap and is quality depth.  He can play center, but is perhaps best at G and T.  Valuable reserve.   Tackle:  While Nijman returns as the swing T behind Moton and Ekwonu, the Panthers need to start developing a RT to play behind Moton.  A late-round draft pick that is rough but has all the tools is ideal. As the fourth OT, he can develop behind some pretty good veterans.   Wide Receiver:  We need a playmaker to play opposite TMac.  I believe in Coker, but think he is the AT-type slot. He needs to be re-signed. XL cannot be counted on to step into that role.  He is not that familiar with the WR position and he does not seem to be a student of the game.  This is a strong WR draft. First or second round.   Tight End:  I dunno.  I can see us upgrading the position, but Tremble does a lot of stuff well aside from catching the ball.  Evans is a decent all-around TE, and Sanders has some upside.  I’d love a weapon, but add the WR.   Running Back:  If Dowdle wants to be here, how do you let him walk?  He will be 28, and most RBs hit the wall then.  He deserves a big contract, but 28-year old RBs on big deals don’t earn them.  Go with Hubbard, Brooks, and Etienne.  Build the OL and the backs get better.   Quarterback:  Well, Bryce is improving and his confidence is growing.  Look at how many other QBs have taken time to get it. He is going to be the QB, regardless.  I want a young QB behind him, not the Red Senior Citizen.     Overview: Free Agent Priorities are to re-sign Mays and Coker.  I have Dowdle in blue, but I would let him walk (for reasons provided).  Cuhran played well and is versatile and should be signed if possible.  Draft a developmental OT, a raw, late-round OT.  In the draft, take a WR in rounds 1 or 2.  The offense is in tact–little needs to be done.  Let the OL develop chemistry, sign Mays while he is entering his prime, and get a weapon opposite TMac.  Give Coker a long-term deal.    Defense: ILB;  With only Wallace on the 2026 payroll, this position needs to be addressed.  Rozeboom might be able to be re-signed. I think ILB will be addressed in free agency and the draft. ILB will be the second or third round pick.  We will re-sign Rozeboom and maybe Cherulus and another priority free agent.   Edge/OLB: Scourton seems to be the real deal, but Princely (needs to develop) and Jones II are role players.  The draft is LOADED at the edge rush position.  I expect a first or second round edge player to be taken.   Defensive Tackle:  We have some big salaries at DT, and with Brown on the field, you dont need stars beside him.  I think the team cuts Robinson to get $8.5m in cap room, especially since C Jackson seems to be ready.     Cornerback:  Morgan has done a tremendous job finding talent in the bargain bins at CB.  Smith-Wade has been very solid.  Thornton seems to be a find.  Mike Jackson is a solid pro.     Safety:  Ransom seems to be the heir apparent for the Scott job, and Moehrig gives them a very aggressive, violent pair of safeties.  I like the safeties in this draft, fwiw.  I expect a late round pick.   Overview:  The Panthers must address ILB and Edge as priorities.  The ILB could be a free agent, Rozeboom re-signing, and maybe a draft pick. However, they need a pass rush more than anything else.   This is a great draft for edge players; I would not be surprised to see Dan Morgan double dip at edge.  Depth at S.   As soon as the season is over, look for Morgan to re-sign Mays, Coker, Cuhran, and possibly Rozeboom and Dowdle.  That would lock up the starting C, #3/slot WR, versatile depth on the OL, and get your leading tackler back at ILB.  Three HUGE moves that sould not break the bank.   Free agency would be focused on adding an ILB and a Safety who can play FS in three-S or big nickel sets. The draft would target Edge, WR, and ILB on days 1 and 2. Day 3:  OT depth, S depth, ILB depth.  
    • Seattle is coming across country to our house which will be packed.  We can beat this damn team.  Agree @TheBigKat the team has improved tremendously from last season
×
×
  • Create New...