Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Latest CBA Update


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, King K. Rhule said:

yeah the playoff thing sucks, but Ill live with it because at the end of the day, I want nothing more than the Panthers winning the Superbowl. Every teams odds increase with this new format.

If more teams are in the playoffs, then any one team's odds of making the playoffs go up. Their odds of winning the super bowl with additional teams in however, go down.

For comparison, the odds of any one college basketball team winning the national championship no matter how good are small, because they have to win 6 (hypothetically potentially even 7) games to do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not think any team should get a bye-the advantage is getting to play the #8 seed (if they go with 16) in the first round at home.  A bye gives the best team a "win" and a week of rest.  I think home field and the easiest first round opponent is enough of an advantage.

Just my thinking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MHS831 said:

I do not think any team should win a bye-the advantage is getting to play the #8 seed (if they go with 16) in the first round at home.  A bye gives the best team a "win" and a week of rest.  I think home field and the easiest first round opponent is enough of an advantage.

Just my thinking

I think the last time I saw somebody run the numbers, the math showed bye teams win over 70% of their first playoff games. which IIRC is something like 10% MORE of a mathematical advantage than regular season home field. As currently constructed the bye is an overwhelming advantage for what amounts to typically a single win or two or a tie breaker advantage over other division winners. It's too much advantage for too little difference in performance most of the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Waldo said:

They need to expand the roster by 5 and keep the 5 inactives. I would be more caring about the playoffs but I don't think that is a problem we have to deal with anytime soon. 

I've never understood why NFL owners are willing to pay 5 guys NFL minimum salaries that can't wear a jersey on game day. Also I think owners would be fine with expanding rosters since what they're negotiating is the piece of the pie all players combined get, but the existing players union might not be super keen on adding five roster spots if they don't think it materially reduces the burden on starters who play the majority of reps if not injured anyway. They may view that as watering down their slice of the pie for marginal return. Hard to say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 1of10Charnatives said:

I've never understood why NFL owners are willing to pay 5 guys NFL minimum salaries that can't wear a jersey on game day. Also I think owners would be fine with expanding rosters since what they're negotiating is the piece of the pie all players combined get, but the existing players union might not be super keen on adding five roster spots if they don't think it materially reduces the burden on starters who play the majority of reps if not injured anyway. They may view that as watering down their slice of the pie for marginal return. Hard to say.

I agree with you on why both sides wouldn't do it. If they add another game to the year and keep up the idiotic Thursday night games, they really should. Football is a game where some guys just are not ready or just can't go but are not to the IR point. There is the whole strategy of the 5 inactives announced right before the game but I don't find it very entertaining to watch a game where injuries kill the competitiveness because they don't have the roster spots and the players aren't hurt enough for IR. The last 5 guys on any roster aren't costing much, I don't know why they are so stuck to those specific numbers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, King K. Rhule said:

yeah the playoff thing sucks, but Ill live with it because at the end of the day, I want nothing more than the Panthers winning the Superbowl. Every teams odds increase with this new format.

Exactly 3.125% of the teams in the league win the Super Bowl every year (1 of 32).  The odds aren't changing because of extra teams in the playoffs.  You could however argue that the odds for the best team to NOT win have increased.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, heelsnum1 said:

Exactly 3.125% of the teams in the league win the Super Bowl every year (1 of 32).  The odds aren't changing because of extra teams in the playoffs.  You could however argue that the odds for the best team to NOT win have increased.

You could argue that with only one team getting a bye that the odds for the best team to win increased. The best team would have the best conference record. Since over 70% of SB champions have had a bye, that’s important and now only the best team gets it. This change would absolutely be a bigger advantage for the 1 seed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sorry man you lost me at "Teppers have evolved as owners". Limped into playoffs at 8-9 not even above .500 Tepper is trash as an owner bro and that's not even a discussion at this point. 37-83 w/l ratio. Nuff said.... Morgan tho, he's cooking and it ain't cuz of Teppers leadership
    • After listening to Morgan's presser twice, I came away with some key beliefs. First of all, I don't think he's a bullshitter. What you see is what you get. When he says something, he means it.  The Teppers really have evolved as owners. Morgan has mentioned how they're easy to work with--a pleasure to work with a few times now. There seems to be a good relationship between all of them (and include Dave Canales on that). We'll see if it lasts. Yes, no one wanted to come to Carolina with the previous management, but that seems to have changed. The team signed arguably the top Edge, LB and OT on the market, two of them on pretty good deals and one on what I'll say is "not a bad one." And, credit Sunshine Dave "Flowers and Cotton Candy" Canales for helping to change the culture. Morgan mentioned getting guys--and I'm paraphrasing--that are not only great football players but great people. Don't look for us to be acquiring any James Pearce types anytime soon, just saying. We'll see if that holds true in the future. Dan Morgan really has set up the Panthers to take the BPA/BAP. He mentioned it at least a couple of times, and he doesn't seem pressured to pinpoint a particular position. He just wants quality players that will help the team. This is how it's going to be (to your joy or dismay, probably for as long as he's here), and personally I love it. Many of us know how Morgan was when he played: aggressive! That's what he's going to be when making acquisitions. He explicitly said it, and emphasized it. All avenues are open (think FA, waivers...the draft)! Personally, as long as it's controlled aggression and not reckless aggression, I love it.  On KP: "Mobility is big in this league."  He basically says if another QB is the BPA while drafting--we're going by our board, people--we're going to add them.        ...  
    • Canes are so fascinating. Despite inconsistent defense and poor goalie play they keep winning. 
×
×
  • Create New...