Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers owner to PSL owners: Success “won’t happen overnight”


TN05

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, Tbe said:

“For starters, former Panthers offensive lineman Geoff Schwartz said the language has changed over the past decade.

“Back then when that happened, it wasn’t referred to as tanking. It just was, OK, we’ll have to try to win with worse players,” Schwartz said. “Now, it feels like the term, tanking, is universal. Rebuild, tank, whatever you want to say. … This year feels like a rebuild. It felt like we were tanking in 2010.”

Several of Schwartz’s teammates from that 2-14 team said the same thing, including one who pointed out that if 2010 was a roster reboot, this year feels like more of an organizationwide rebuild for the Panthers.”

 

Problem is this team on paper wasn't the worst team and had the lowest talent.. Again they had atleast 5 pro bowl talented players and were coming off of a 12-4 team  a year before.. Not to mention they gave out crazy contracts that off season... Shcawrts is just hindsight 20/20 the opinion...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've really got people here arguing that the 2010 season was Richardson and co. putting on their best effort to win with lame duck Fox and the law firm of Moore & Clausen & St. Pierre which just happened to be the year before the lockout was set to occur?

chappelle show lol GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

Problem is this team on paper wasn't the worst team and had the lowest talent.. Again they had atleast 5 pro bowl talented players and were coming off of a 12-4 team  a year before.. Not to mention they gave out crazy contracts that off season... Shcawrts is just hindsight 20/20 the opinion...

It wasn’t just Schwartz saying that. Several players from that squat said the same thing.

Either way, I’d rather have a plan to try and get better for the long term than suck for decades waiting for things to happen “naturally”.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Problem is this team on paper wasn't the worst team and had the lowest talent.. Again they had atleast 5 pro bowl talented players and were coming off of a 12-4 team  a year before.. Not to mention they gave out crazy contracts that off season... Shcawrts is just hindsight 20/20 the opinion...

You're getting your years mixed up. They were 12-4 in 2008 and 8-8 in 2009 (and the 8-8 was after winning 3 out of 4 once eliminated from the playoffs in December). All of the crazy contracts were given out during the offseason leading up to 2011. Read the article below, it even cites that Gross and Steve Smith were questioning whether they should stay or not after the season because it didn't look like we were committed to winning.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d8213b0de/article/panthers-owner-richardson-turns-big-spender-in-free-agency

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Panther'sBigD said:

 

LOL, yes. Because their stellar 10-6 season where they lost in the wildcard round was preceded by records of 4-12, 2-14 & 4-12. 

Sure, you want to know how many starters were on that 2013 KC team that Reid took over from that 2010 roster?

Offense

Jamaal Charles(drafted 3rd round 2008)

Dwayne Bowe(drafted 1st round[23rd overall] in 2007)

Defense

Derrick Johnson(drafted 1st round[15th overall] in 2005)

Eric Berry(drafted 1st round[5th overall] in 2010)

Tamba Hali(drafted 1st round[23rd overall] in 2006)

Brandon Flowers(drafted 2nd round in 2008)

Kendrick Lewis(drafted 5th round in 2010)

Brandon Albert(drafted 1st round[15th overall] in 2008)

 

So 5 starters from the three years of eating poo and only two from the first round. Not exactly a windfall of talent that they gained to build his team. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, X-Clown said:

We've really got people here arguing that the 2010 season was Richardson and co. putting on their best effort to win with lame duck Fox and the law firm of Moore & Clausen & St. Pierre which just happened to be the year before the lockout was set to occur?

chappelle show lol GIF

I know you ppl are devoid of doing any research  but it's not that hard to look and see that roster wasn't that bad.. And Matt Moore was coming off 6 game winning streak   and they barely missed the playoffs that year.. Also Clausen by most analysts was considered pro ready and a steal...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Panther'sBigD said:

So what you're saying is, they're NOT an example of a quick turnaround. Got it. Thanks!

Yeah, it is a perfect example. When they had 6 win seasons or 8 win seasons, they immediately bounced back. But I guess you want to live in this fantasy land of no team getting better after having 1-2 down seasons. That's fine, just keep making yourself look like a buffoon. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, X-Clown said:

You're getting your years mixed up. They were 12-4 in 2008 and 8-8 in 2009 (and the 8-8 was after winning 3 out of 4 once eliminated from the playoffs in December). All of the crazy contracts were given out during the offseason leading up to 2011. Read the article below, it even cites that Gross and Steve Smith were questioning whether they should stay or not after the season because it didn't look like we were committed to winning.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d8213b0de/article/panthers-owner-richardson-turns-big-spender-in-free-agency

I said the year before.. 2008.. 2009 Jake fell apart at the beginning of the season.. Fox waited to long to bring Moore in and they went on a winning streak and almost made the playoffs..  They were still in the playoff hunt up until the last game  and lost out due to a points thing in the later games 2009.. look it up.. .. Look at the roster that team wasn't the worst roster in the league.. They were trying to have a bounce back season.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Tbe said:

It wasn’t just Schwartz saying that. Several players from that squat said the same thing.

Either way, I’d rather have a plan to try and get better for the long term than suck for decades waiting for things to happen “naturally”.

It is dumb because tank plans fail.. Asked the Dolphins..  To many variables..

1. You aren't the only team doing it..

2. Players get hurt or fug up their draft stock..

3. Pro players aren't going to play bad because you want them to..

And even if you think the Panthers were trying to tank in 2010 for Luck.. 

How did that Work out??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, it is a perfect example. When they had 6 win seasons or 8 win seasons, they immediately bounced back. But I guess you want to live in this fantasy land of no team getting better after having 1-2 down seasons. That's fine, just keep making yourself look like a buffoon. 

You're the one that trotted them out as an example of a team that was able to make a 'quick turnaround.' They haven't had a losing record in 17 years. A lot has changed in the NFL since then. Their 'turnarounds' have been 4 games or less. That's not a turnaround, it's coming back from a down year. A turnaround would be what Tepper and Rhule are attempting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Panther'sBigD said:

You're the one that trotted them out as an example of a team that was able to make a 'quick turnaround.' They haven't had a losing record in 17 years. A lot has changed in the NFL since then. Their 'turnarounds' have been 4 games or less. That's not a turnaround, it's coming back from a down year. A turnaround would be what Tepper and Rhule are attempting. 

You can twist the word to whatever you want it to mean but it doesn't change the fact that multiple examples were given to your incredibly stupid question. The fact that Green Bay didn't IMMEDIATELY come to mind makes me wonder how much of the NFL you actually follow at all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

It is dumb because tank plans fail.. Asked the Dolphins..  To many variables..

1. You aren't the only team doing it..

2. Players get hurt or fug up their draft stock..

3. Pro players aren't going to play bad because you want them to..

And even if you think the Panthers were trying to tank in 2010 for Luck.. 

How did that Work out??

So there is risk in life? Interesting.

I guess your plan is to do nothing and wait for good things to happen. 
 

I’d rather us be bold and try something and fail than doing nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Players are playing for their next paycheck / to feed their families. They're not going to tank.

Young players are trying to make a name for themselves in what might be their only shot. They're not going to tank.

Older players might be riding out their last chance at a ring or glory. They're not going to tank.

Coaches and assistants are likewise coaching for their jobs and are sometimes a bad season away from unemployment. They're not going to tank.

About the only way that the team could successfully tank would be to take the "Major League" approach and fill a roster with guys who shouldn't even be there. If you can put together a bad enough roster, then you might actually be able to tank despite the best efforts of those involved.

So I guess the question becomes can our current leadership put together a roster that stinks bad enough to get us a really high pick?

Well, given that they've done so before even when they weren't actually trying to, I'd say the answer is probably yes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

You can twist the word to whatever you want it to mean but it doesn't change the fact that multiple examples were given to your incredibly stupid question. The fact that Green Bay didn't IMMEDIATELY come to mind makes me wonder how much of the NFL you actually follow at all. 

My original post was, "Name two teams that have had 'quick turnarounds' that have had sustained success." The two examples you gave were a team that hasn't had a losing record in almost two decades, and a team that had a quick turnaround, but has not shown any ability to sustain it yet, and Aaron Rodgers is getting older and more beaten up, so nothing is certain. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Observer article    I left out the specialists which is the 3rd position  Panthers haven’t drafted three positions under Morgan: Will that change in 2026? Mike Kaye [email protected] 4 hrs ago The Carolina Panthers, two years into the Dan Morgan-Dave Canales era, have yet to draft an offensive lineman. That is likely to change in 2026. The organization has selected  three wide receivers,  two tight ends,  two running backs, two defensive backs, two defensive linemen and two outside linebackers  during the shared reign of Morgan and Canales. Those multiple selections at several positions have come at the expense of the offensive line. But there are other positions that have been avoided, too. With the 2026 NFL Scouting Combine ongoing in Indianapolis, let’s take a look at the three notable positions evaded by the organization over the past two drafts: Quarterback Last time position was drafted by Panthers:Bryce Young (first round, 2023) Impending free agents at the position: N/A Current depth chart under contract: Young, Andy Dalton   The Panthers can’t really be criticized for not selecting a quarterback over the past two years. The team invested a ton of draft capital in Young while trading up for the first overall pick in 2023. Young has legitimately rebounded from a brutal rookie year and a whirlwind 2024 season that saw him get benched for roughly a third of the campaign. The Heisman trophy-winning passer posted career-high numbers in 2025, and the Panthers have already publicly noted that they will pick up the fifth-year option on his rookie contract. So, Young will be under contract through at least the 2027 season. His longtime veteran backup, Andy Dalton, is entering the final year of his deal. Morgan hasn’t minced words when discussing his desire to add a younger QB behind Young. The Panthers are hoping to contend long term, and they’ll need to manage costs throughout the roster in order to retain their top-tier talent. Drafting a quarterback on Day 3 could provide the Panthers with a cost-effective backup for Young for years to come. That savings could then help them invest elsewhere. Dalton is guaranteed $2 million this season. If he were to be traded, the Panthers would save $4 million on the salary cap. That’s probably not enough savings to force a move, but given Morgan’s outlook on getting younger, it could lead to at least some consideration. Dalton, 38, could also be bounced if the Panthers decide to target it a younger journeyman QB in free agency. The backup quarterback spot has some offseason intrigue for the first time in a while. Offensive line Last time position was drafted by Panthers:G Chandler Zavala (fourth round, 2023) Impending free agents at the position: C Cade Mays, OT Yosh Nijman, G/C Austin Corbett, T/C Brady Christensen, G/T Jake Curhan   Current depth chart under contract: LT Ickey Ekwonu, LG Damien Lewis, C Nick Samac, RG Rob Hunt, RT Taylor Moton, Zavala, Ja’Tyre Carter, Joshua Gray, Saahdiq Charles The Panthers are set at three of their five starting positions on the offensive line. However, their outlooks at left tackle and center are certainly unenviable. Ekwonu ruptured his patellar tendon in the playoff loss to the Los Angeles Rams last month. And despite being due $17.5 million in the final year of his rookie contract, Ekwonu might miss a good portion of the 2026 seasonfollowing a notable knee surgery.   Mays, the starting center, is set to become a free agent in March. While he’s played quite well over the past two years, the Panthers might need to pass on re-signing him to improve other positions on the open market. Mays was cut by Carolina in 2024 and lost the 2025 center battle to Corbett this past summer. So, there’s reason to believe the Panthers aren’t totally sold on him being a long-term answer, either. With all that said, both positions have quite a bit of fluidity. Having Hunt and Lewis at the guard spots might make Morgan feel better about putting a rookie at center in 2026. The same sentiment, though, probably can’t be said about left tackle, as the Panthers will want to reinforce Young’s blind side with Ekwonu shelved. Nijman is likely among the internal free agents who Morgan wants to re-sign, and if that pact happens, look for the Panthers to be patient at tackle in the draft. With Christensen, Curhan, Corbett, Nijman and Mays all set to hit the market, the Panthers are likely to have several new faces on the offensive line depth chart in training camp. The Panthers will probably make multiple moves in the trenches during free agency and the draft.   Selecting a long-term swing tackle with starter upside — especially with Ekwonu set to hit free agency in 2027 — seems inevitable.  
    • Making the playoffs as quickly as he did after what he inherited was impressive.  He inherited the worst team in the league with a depleted roster, missing draft picks, and a QB who just had a historically bad rookie season.  I mean it's hard to get much worse.  I wish he would hire someone to call plays because I think that's his weakness, but maybe he can get better there as he gets experience.
    • Sheesh.  If Bryce had won the Super Bowl, y'all woulda been like "He didn't win by enough. He missed that pass in the third quarter." fug it. We went to the playoffs, no matter how we got there and played a helluva game where we came up just a bit short of advancing. It's been a long time since we even made it to the post season for anything. But hey, keep punching yourself in the nuts because you think that's what you need to do. 
×
×
  • Create New...