Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stock Market seems volatile


Happy Panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Squirrel said:

Yeah and I decide to pick up some wells Fargo yesterday afternoon. Fml. 

Wells will yield some huge returns in next 1-2 years.  They have been made a scapegoat here in US.  They got crashed for something that every bank did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/28/2020 at 5:50 AM, NCPanthrfan said:

Financials are dangerous.

Not really.  They tend to be no more or less dangerous than most other stock.  Wells stock futures depend on how well the new CEO handles the PR side and can keep their names out of the media. 

Edited by Davidson Deac II
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Not really.  They tend to be no more or less dangerous than most other stock.  Wells stock futures depend on how well the new CEO handles the PR side and can keep their names out of the media. 

He’s doing all the right things.  Wells are stealing all employees from Bofa right now... good and bad.  Huge issue with Wells was their culture.  He’s fixing that.  Look for Wells to move their corporate to Charlotte in next few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
2 hours ago, Happy Panther said:

F has yet to recover. I made a bundle on Jan 2021 calls. Could be the next play -  maybe double up on the stock itself or June 2021 calls. Nothing else I follow seems terribly undervalued.

F has gotten me 33% returns so far and I plan on holding it to about $9. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I made a significant amount on UAL, took the profits before they dropped again, then sunk it into Exxon.  Its down a litte right now, but I expect it to go up within a year or two.  In the meantime, they pay a nice dividend.  Also bought a company called Mitek, but I am beginning to think that one wasn't a wise purchase.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No. Physical tools alone aren't enough. There are plenty of examples of draft busts to support that. Aost all of them had the physical tools and that wasn't enough. But Bryce is a perfect example of the opposite. Absolutely elite intangibles aren't enough either. If you simply don't have the physical abilities all the football intelligence and work ethic in the world won't be enough to overcome it. Just look to the sidelines every Sunday. We call those people "coaches".
    • As much as I despise Billy B, his philosophy on QBs is how I would approach things if I were a GM. You always keep looking for your next starter.  He has Bledsoe, who got injured and his backup ended up being the GOAT. Even while he had that going, he kept getting his next guy and developing them. When Brady got hurt, Cassel stepped in and went 11-5 and they missed the wild card by dumb luck. Who knows how far they would have gone if they had gotten in. Jimmy Gs career started in NE. There were others, but he always kept looking.  You can't be afraid to keep looking for your next starter, but it looks like we're afraid to look for more than a marginal one. If you're going to offer a $25m contract with incentives, that screams marginal QB. It also screams you're just a transition until we find our guy. After a 10 or 11 win season, he's not accepting that offer. And then you're in a Daniel Jones situation. Do you pay for a year of success and pray it wasn't a one year wonder?  To this point, Bryce has really produced nothing, yet for whatever reason, our FO has not even sniffed at the idea that we need a real QB room with real QBs. Dalton was never starter potential, Plummer was a joke. KP certainly isn't, neither is Grier.  Our approach to the QB room needs to be one of strength not fear. Bring in guys who can compete or who you think can compete. This is THE elite position, in an elite sport, paid premium salary, where production matters. Either you produce or you can lose your job. It's not mean, it's just the reality of the position.  And I'm really just tired of our candy ass approach to it. 
    • If you plug Bryce onto the Pro Bowl roster you might have a chance to compete for a SB. If he's surrounded by top tier talent with a top tier defense on the other side, a field flipping punter, and a kicker good from 60+ you might have a chance. But that means you basically have to recreate Saban's Bama in the NFL and that's impossible... and Bryce couldn't win a championship in that environment either. What the Panthers didn't realize when they got so obsessed with his "PG mentality" was that what they were looking st was a "barely checks the box PG". The basketball equivalent of Bryce would be an undersized PG with marginal athleticism who can make the basic plays but adds nothing to the team in terms of elevating the overall team. Not a great shooter, not a great defender, not a great driver. Just a guy who can basically get you into the offense and be a matador on defense. Basically a placeholder while you look to upgrade the PG position. 
×
×
  • Create New...