Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stock Market seems volatile


Happy Panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I love how people will bitch about big oil, pharma giants and other predatory types of big business but then they'll own the stock. I've always despised the hypocrisy of acting as if your hands are clean when you're holding the stock. "I'm just an investor, I don't support the company." Nope. Doesn't work like that. If you own the stock, you're complicit. Period.

I'll hop off my soapbox now. 😂

 

My Gazprom is not doing well...

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I love how people will bitch about big oil, pharma giants and other predatory types of big business but then they'll own the stock. I've always despised the hypocrisy of acting as if your hands are clean when you're holding the stock. "I'm just an investor, I don't support the company." Nope. Doesn't work like that. If you own the stock, you're complicit. Period.

I'll hop off my soapbox now. 😂

 

I don't buy anything that I don't support.

It hurts me in the long run, but I don't care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, thefuzz said:

I don't buy anything that I don't support.

It hurts me in the long run, but I don't care.

The world would be auch better place if everyone followed that model. I have a Tesla driving solar powered home greenie to the core buddy who was bragging about the money he'd made trading big oil stocks. I'm like, wait... WHAT?! He absolutely could not comprehend that buy owning the stocks he's complicit. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Shocker said:

This entire economy thing is hilarious…if everyone cannot see that resources are dwindling at amazing rates and everyone can’t even buy groceries doesn’t tell you the state of the world nothing will.  Things are never going to be “normal” again.  Everyone better be prepared to live with less from now on

We are a society on the downslope of the bell curve and it will not go anywhere but down

eh, tech and innovation are still going to continue.  The leaps will continue to get bigger and faster IMO.   Crashes are a pretty consistent thing that occur.  I don't really consider the economy and market doing anything earth shattering.   Even a massive recession wouldn't be a game changer.  Would just a first time for some. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/25/2022 at 4:41 PM, thefuzz said:

I don't buy anything that I don't support.

It hurts me in the long run, but I don't care.

Hypothetical example 

  • somebody is against oil companies
  • they make an effort not to own oil company stocks , instead deciding to invest only in companies they believe in
  • they believe in Coca Cola (or Pepsi, or Nestle, or some other manufacturer) and buy those stocks
  • those companies are reliant on plastics and transportation fuel, both of which require oil… the purchase of which directly supports the oil companies that the hypothetical person is against

All depends,on the companies and businesses/products, but there are going to be an almost infinite list of cross-usage scenarios that will contradict any single-focused investor

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, PanthersATL said:

Hypothetical example 

  • somebody is against oil companies
  • they make an effort not to own oil company stocks , instead deciding to invest only in companies they believe in
  • they believe in Coca Cola (or Pepsi, or Nestle, or some other manufacturer) and buy those stocks
  • those companies are reliant on plastics and transportation fuel, both of which require oil… the purchase of which directly supports the oil companies that the hypothetical person is against

All depends,on the companies and businesses/products, but there are going to be an almost infinite list of cross-usage scenarios that will contradict any single-focused investor

It is impossible not to contribute to oil companies in some manner in today's environment. That's just reality. But there's a big difference between that and being an active stockholder. You can't with any shred of intellectual honesty claim to give a single fug about the environment while holding big oil stock in the same way that you can't claim to give a single fug about improving our broken healthcare system while holding big pharma stocks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/26/2022 at 4:37 PM, LinvilleGorge said:

our broken healthcare system while holding big pharma stocks.

I know the news is full of stories about outrageous medical bills.

Is some of that more related to crazy malpractice insurance that the docs need to maintain?  Or are you talking about how US drug prices are a bit higher vs other countries?

Other countries' medical systems aren't necessarily better than the US.  In many cases, you can get free care for whatever you need, but you may be on a waiting list for years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amazon is going to open at $122 on Monday (post-split price).

Guesses on whether that'll jump because it's more affordable to the average investor, or not really any impact because folks can buy partial shares nowadays anyway?   On the bright side?  The recent days of $100 up/down price swings are temporarily over (to be replaced with $5-$10 price swings, I'm sure)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
1 hour ago, Happy Panther said:

If the anticipated rate hike goes through its going to be a wild ride.

I honestly think at least 50 points is already priced in. Maybe more like 62.5 since a lot of people are expecting 75.

I expect 75. I think the Fed actually wants to do 100 but they realize that'd be the equivalent of yanking the e-brake on the home stretch of the Daytona 500. Yeah, it's a cold water fire hose on inflation but it's also gonna cause a fiery pileup of a crash. 😂

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...