Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What we think we know about the first 7 picks


MHS831

Recommended Posts

I think there are three assumptions to be made that are fairly accurate and consistent with needs.  I would like to add rumors to this thread that draw us closer to making some educated guesses about round 1.  I will change this page as we come to some degree of consensus, but it is hard for one person to keep up with all the rumors--although reading local sites and papers in each community helps.  I think we can eliminate some players and some teams to focus in on exactly who will be available.  

 

1.  Cincinnati Bengals:  Burrow QB  (the crystal ball is pretty clear on this one) This pick is about 99% certain.

2. Washington Redskins:  Young, DE (some have Rivera trying to move out of this pick, but at the end of the day, moving down and leaving Young on the table could get a GM fired.)  This pick is about 85% certain, maybe higher.

3. Detroit Lions:  Okudah, CB.  This is where it gets interesting.  The Lions are likely to trade back with the Phins or Bolts.  regardless, they will probably take CB Okudah.  However, they like Brown as well, and many in Detroit are comparing him to Suh.  I would not be surprised to see Brown if the Lions trade back or not, but again, the GM that leaves a pure shutdown CB of Okudah's caliber for a DT might lose his job.  Detroit could move farther back, however, say to #10 or so, but that trade would be expensive.  I say there is about an 85% chance the Lions end up with Okudah at #3 or a trade back to #5 or so.  There is a 15% they take Brown. (guestimates).

4. New York Giants:  Thomas, OT.  OK, Gettlemen will get offers to move back.  He can and still get his man.  However, Gettlemen used to race his picks to the podium without taking offers; this should be different.  A team looking for Tua will want to move up.  The Phins and the Bolts are the probable partners.  Either way, as long as the Giants stay in front of us, the NY writers are falling away from Simmons and moving toward the best day 1 Left Tackle in the draft.  Gettlemen has been catching a bit of heat about Jones--he needs to protect him.  Jones had a lot of fumbles and was sacked too much last year.  Getting the best, experienced, "plug and play" LT in the draft is the right move for NY.  Gettlemen likes his hog mollies.  I am about 80% sure that he takes a T.  Of the 4 top tackles, Becton or Thomas are the only LTs.  Gettlemen will take Thomas.

Note:  If we can trust the NY media (this makes complete sense for NY), then we can feel rather confident that Miami and the LA Chargers are going QB.  I am guessing that both teams moved up with Detroit and NY Giants, but it does not really matter because teams will still take the players identified here.  So let's say the following:

5. Miami: Dolphins  Tua. QB. The Dolphins have 38-year old QB Fitzpatrick under contract this season, a QB more than capable of transitioning to Tua when he is ready. The only question here?  Will Miami move up to assure the Chargers stay away from their guy?  Probably--they have the capital.  I would say that Miami is 95% sure to get a QB, and I would say that they are about 75% sure to get Tua--if that is who they want.  This could be the big shocker of the draft, with the Dolphins sitting tight and taking Herbert or Love.

6. Los Angeles Chargers: Justin Herbert QB.   Most of the LA writers and Charger reports say this:  The Chargers are not going to look for a QB in free agency.  They are either move up for Tua Tag... in a trade with Detroit or NY, or they are going to sit tight and take Herbert or Love.   It seems unlikely that they do not take a QB, but if that were to happen and they feel Tyrod Taylor is the man, they would take a LT, like Becton or Wirf. Smart money has them staying put if they have decided on Love/Herbert.  If they move up, then Miami probably takes Herbert or Love.  I would say that the Chargers are about 95% sure to end up with Tua, Herbert, or Love.

Note:  So reading the tabloids, websites, and boards from the other teams tells us a lot about what the fans and writers in these other cities are expecting their team to do.  I would bet that the first six picks in this speculation are accurate, only the order may deviate a bit.

The Panthers are now on the clock and in an interesting situation.  Here are their options:

  • Draft Simmons, the best player on everyone's board and a real Swiss army knife for defensive coordinators
  • Draft Brown, a Suh-like stud that will be a presence for years.
  • Longshot:  Draft a T in the best OT draft in a while.  In fact, the best OT to come out of the draft in recent years (Wills) would still be available. 
  • Longshot:  Draft a WR and give Bridgewater the best WR corps in the NFL
  • Trade back:  Some teams will want Simmons--the last truly elite player left.  Secondly, starting with Arizona at #9, Cleveland at #10, the NY Jets at #11, and the Bucs at #14 (they want to keep Brady healthy) ALL having OT as a primary need, the Panthers will get offers to trade down.  Becton is the only pure LT left in the top 4;  Wirfs and Wills are RTs with the ability to transition.

Agree?  Disagree?  Did I miss something?

Just trying to give us some topics during this homebound mess.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a bit of a crap shoot after the first two picks IMO. The next handful of players could come off the board in just about any order and it wouldn't shock me. Then there's the ever present QB wildcard. Herbert, Tua, and Love could go top 5-10 or they could fall to the mid-1st or later. Who knows?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with this write up. Detroit needs to replace Slay and NY needs to protect Jones.The trickiest one is actually the Chargers IMO. What if the Chargers can acquire Cam? What if Miami takes Herbert and they don’t think Tua is 100%?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's a bit of a crap shoot after the first two picks IMO. The next handful of players could come off the board in just about any order and it wouldn't shock me. Then there's the ever present QB wildcard. Herbert, Tua, and Love could go top 5-10 or they could fall to the mid-1st or later. Who knows?

The QB scramble is likely to dictate the top ten picks. We could see as many as four QB's picked or as little as two. 

I think that is the most difficult aspect to predict, which teams are going to go QB. If it is anything like the typical draft, once the second QB comes off the board, the run will be on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, MMA said:

Give me Jeudy

Seriously, what do you think the odds are?  I read somewhere that Cee Dee Lamb is creeping above Jeudy--they think he is the better pro WR.  I have not looked into either, because I do not see it unless we trade down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Simmons is the ultimate "positionless player" as Matt Rhule would say. I think he's just too talented to pass up, if he's there at 7 we take him no matter what any other team offers to trade up. 

Yeah, been saying this for 2 months (many of us have).  It simply makes too much sense.  Imagine transitioning to a nickel vs hurry up offenses with a LB?  Not having to sub?  Even though I doubt he plays inside, losing Luke sealed this decision.

In this scenario, he is simply the BPA.  Wills is probably next.  I want Wills, but have been saying Simmons since breaking down positions in January.  If Gettlemen does not take him, barring a trade, I do not see who else would.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, SOJA said:

I really think the phins are taking Herbert 

If so, they will stay put and let the Chargers trade up.  However, that does not work well for SD, unless they go with Tyrod Taylor for a season... Not a way to thrill a fan base, is it?  The Bolts need a starting caliber QB, so if they trade up, they could take Herbert.  Get your popcorn ready.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...