Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2021 mock draft


MMA

Recommended Posts

I honesty think detroit has a solid team, they had some loses that were coin flips against some solid teams last year, and they only got better. I really think the QB at Jacksonville is solid and they'll be okay. I just don't see a team worse than us after we lost our best player on defense and our best CB. Rookies almost always take some time to develop, idc how good they are ala McCaffrey, Luke Keuckly etc etc.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, qazsazsaz said:

I honesty think detroit has a solid team, they had some loses that were coin flips against some solid teams last year, and they only got better. I really think the QB at Jacksonville is solid and they'll be okay. I just don't see a team worse than us after we lost our best player on defense and our best CB. Rookies almost always take some time to develop, idc how good they are ala McCaffrey, Luke Keuckly etc etc.  

I do think that Detroit will be better than us. They made some good moves. Jacksonville will be pretty bad. Minshew is overrated as hell. Trade Fournette and Yannick and they will be bad bad. We should’ve signed Joe Schobert. Washington is one team that could be terribly bad if qb play suck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, MMA said:

I do think that Detroit will be better than us. They made some good moves. Jacksonville will be pretty bad. Minshew is overrated as hell. Trade Fournette and Yannick and they will be bad bad. We should’ve signed Joe Schobert. Washington is one team that could be terribly bad if qb play suck.

I think redskins will be better than the eagles 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, MMA said:

I do think that Detroit will be better than us. They made some good moves. Jacksonville will be pretty bad. Minshew is overrated as hell. Trade Fournette and Yannick and they will be bad bad. We should’ve signed Joe Schobert. Washington is one team that could be terribly bad if qb play suck.

I don't think Minshew is good or anything, but I think he's better than what we got. Also, they haven't traded either of those two players yet so let that happen first before something happens. I actually think Washington will be a 6+ win team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, VirginiaMike said:

A little too early to start that discussion.

What about players that weren't drafted that still could add value to the team?  Many have already been signed UFA.  But, How about this guy?

Nick Coe, DE,

https://www.nfl.com/prospects/nick-coe?id=3219434f-4504-9912-298c-8b971f7b8218

Lot of talent, but had some personal problems at Auburn. Worth a shot though. 

My family who never watches football, saw him in the iron bowl. And despite standing next to derrick brown and marlon, my aunt was like who is that guy?!?! Hes got the phyiscal tools for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well if we play all the rookies to get them all experience,..and Rhule keeps up his past records then we should win 2 games...

that puts us in contention. The Redskins, Jags, Colts I think are our “competition” ha.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, JARROD said:

Well if we play all the rookies to get them all experience,..and Rhule keeps up his past records then we should win 2 games...

that puts us in contention. The Redskins, Jags, Colts I think are our “competition” ha.

 

I think the skins have some talent and RR will get to 8 wins.  Damn chase young on that defense is going to be really good.  The colts have a good roster and rivers is still capable.  The jags will def suck though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...