Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB Conundrum


WarHeel

Recommended Posts

By now you’ve likely found yourself in one of two camps regarding our current QB situation. 
 

Some believe Teddy’s is doing about as well as anyone would do under the circumstances of starting with a fresh system, depleted line, injuries to your best weapon. 
 

The other side claims that he is subpar or certainly not a franchise QB due to the fact that he can only dink and dunk, isn’t clutch, etc. These folks typically use language that suggests the coaching staff is forced to call plays that fit Teddy’s abilities or lack-thereof. This narrative typically ignores the notion of subpar protection from the offensive line, defensive woes, learning curve in a new system with the most turned-over roster in the NFL, etc. All the while touting how great our coaching staff has been in the process of said turnover. 

The problem I have with the latter camp is this:

If Teddy is truly subpar and play calling is only a representation of his skill set then why not place blame on staff/management for charading him as someone who has what it takes to consistently lead this team to victory? That’s what we were fed this off-season. NO ONE in leadership of this new regime even slightly hinted at the fact that Teddy was a bridge (no pun intended) in the long term plans of this organization’s future. 
 

Point being, if your narrative is that Teddy isn’t cut out to win consistently in this league as a starter in Carolina then we first have to point the blame to the powers that ordained him in the first place. You can’t sing one’s praises while cursing the other. 
 

That’s just my humble opinion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The contract screams bridge. All the interest in Herbert screams bridge. It's not like you're ever gonna sign a guy and come out and say, "Well, this is our guy until we can find someone who is actually good. Sorry."

It’s not like it’s a 1 year deal. For all we know the Herbert talk was smokescreen. 

 

Correct me if I’m wrong but Patriots staff inferred that the former MVP Cam Newton had to win an open competition for QB1 in NE against a couple of on-fire garbage cans. Whether that was BS or not they didn’t just outright say “this is our guy.” So it is plausible for staff to be somewhat neutral in their speech regarding player leadership. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My “humble” opinion is the team never should have signed him in the first place. Never liked him even when he was with the Saints and Vikings. A better O-line isn’t going to to make him a better passer and he isn’t going to change his game, ever. 
All will happen is he will have more time to hit short or intermediate throws. Look at the Saints when he started. Way better O-line and he still did mostly checkdowns and short passes with the occasional easy deep throw. 
Teddy is a QB that is elevated by the team around him. I don’t want that. I want a QB that can elevate the offense and push the ball down the field. Not throw freaking checkdowns with 16 seconds left. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

It’s not like it’s a 1 year deal. For all we know the Herbert talk was smokescreen. 

 

Correct me if I’m wrong but Patriots staff inferred that the former MVP Cam Newton had to win an open competition for QB1 in NE against a couple of on-fire garbage cans. Whether that was BS or not they didn’t just outright say “this is our guy.” So it is plausible for staff to be somewhat neutral in their speech regarding player leadership. 

Teddy signed a three year $60M contract (that's easily voidable after two years). Cam signed something like a $1M deal. Huge difference there. Teddy's contract screams stopgap starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

It’s not like it’s a 1 year deal. For all we know the Herbert talk was smokescreen. 

 

Correct me if I’m wrong but Patriots staff inferred that the former MVP Cam Newton had to win an open competition for QB1 in NE against a couple of on-fire garbage cans. Whether that was BS or not they didn’t just outright say “this is our guy.” So it is plausible for staff to be somewhat neutral in their speech regarding player leadership. 

Cam was signed to a 1 yr incentive-laden low-cost deal so that speaks for itself. Teddy's contract absolutely says bridge or 'prove it'. 

Your overall premise is also incorrect in that most Teddy critics don't care what this staff has done since Teddy is gonna Teddy no matter what, just like he did in NO and in Minnesota. Do you or anyone else really think the alleged mastermind of Burrow and that LSU air attack came to the NFL just to try to penny and nickel away at defenses? If he did then he, Teddy, Rhule, and anyone else involved are in well over their heads

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Teddy signed a three year $60M contract (that's easily voidable after two years). Cam signed something like a $1M deal. Huge difference there. Teddy's contract screams stopgap starter.

I think the contract exudes more confidence than lack there of. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

My “humble” opinion is the team never should have signed him in the first place. Never liked him even when he was with the Saints and Vikings. A better O-line isn’t going to to make him a better passer and he isn’t going to change his game, ever. 
All will happen is he will have more time to hit short or intermediate throws. Look at the Saints when he started. Way better O-line and he still did mostly checkdowns and short passes with the occasional easy deep throw. 
Teddy is a QB that is elevated by the team around him. I don’t want that. I want a QB that can elevate the offense and push the ball down the field. Not throw freaking checkdowns with 16 seconds left. 

I agree with this sentiment. I thought the Panthers should have either kept Cam or rolled with Kyle Allen and planned to suck it up to get a QB in 2021. Bridgewater is good enough to win enough games to take us out of the running for the top QBs. Panthers will have to trade up to get a top QB in the draft now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, KSpan said:

Cam was signed to a 1 yr incentive-laden low-cost deal so that speaks for itself. Teddy's contract absolutely says bridge or 'prove it'. 

Your overall premise is also incorrect for n that most Teddy critics don't care what this staff has done since Teddy is goinna Teddy no matter just like he did in NO and in Minnesota. Do you or anyone else really think the alleged mastermind of Burrow and that LSU air attack came to the NFL just to try to penny and nickel away at defenses? If he did then then he, Teddy, Rhule, and anyone else involved are in well over their heads.

Y’all keep bringing up his 5-0 record in New Orleans and his open ended tenure in MN prior to a would be career ending injury for most like it proves anything other than the jury is still out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

I think the contract exudes more confidence than lack there of. 

If they were confident in him he would have gotten more money or more years. It’s a show me contract. As far as why not blame coaches... do you want them to say “hey we don’t have too much here but we will try to make it competitive”?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

My “humble” opinion is the team never should have signed him in the first place. Never liked him even when he was with the Saints and Vikings. A better O-line isn’t going to to make him a better passer and he isn’t going to change his game, ever. 
All will happen is he will have more time to hit short or intermediate throws. Look at the Saints when he started. Way better O-line and he still did mostly checkdowns and short passes with the occasional easy deep throw. 
Teddy is a QB that is elevated by the team around him. I don’t want that. I want a QB that can elevate the offense and push the ball down the field. Not throw freaking checkdowns with 16 seconds left. 

I appreciate your sentiments regarding the signing. But again, the guy was 5-0 in NO. He was winning, so one could argue he had something there he doesn’t have here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Varking said:

If they were confident in him he would have gotten more money or more years. It’s a show me contract. As far as why not blame coaches... do you want them to say “hey we don’t have too much here but we will try to make it competitive”?

That’s essentially what Tepper inferred in that it’ll be a 5 year process. I’m paraphrasing but he at least had the balls to call it like it is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...