Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panther defense most conservative in the league.


panthers55

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Blitzing is a philosophical thing. Heaven knows there have been defensive coaches that absolutely loved it, but you needed to have great cover DBs to make it work.

But then you saw Dick LeBeau start using blitz schemes with zone coverage behind it. The Steelers lived off that for years.

Jim Johnson figured out how to use it with a 4-3 alignment. That concept got passed down to an old friend of ours named Ron Rivera, and he used it here.

And is currently being used to good effect by one of his disciples, Sean McDermott, in Buffalo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Defense has steadily gotten better as the year has gone on, from almost last to right in the middle. This is a great sign and is to be expected. Looks a lot like what Rhule has done wherever he has gone.

If the Oline is built properly for the next franchise QB...we can be competitive. 
 

Unfortunatley Hurney is in charge of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

No, the original post to this thread talked exactly about blitzing more or less. Weather you are playing a 3-3-5 or 4-2-5 you can still blitz the same amount.  People are getting to caught up in formations.

And from the chart that Kungfoodude created, opposing QBs actually played worse when we blitzed less, so maybe our answer isn't as easy as just "blitzing more".   So you are assuming if we blitzed more other teams would score less?  Exactly what are you basing that on?  I doubt you have anything concrete to back that up.  At least Kungfoodude is presenting facts to help people form an opinion.

Actually you are wrong about how we use the 3-3-5. We don't blitz off it that much I can see. And if you do blitz with 3 linemen you are usually setting your linebackers 5 yards back and using green dog delayed blitzes. They take time and can be easier picked up because when you rush 3 at least 2 guys are doubled giving you 2 linemen who can easily slough off and pick up the blitzer. If you rush 4 they can only double 1 guy and don't have but 1 guy who can.pick up the blitzer without keeping a tight end on in running back to help. Now if you are lining 6 guys on the line and sending different ones at different times you have both TEs and running backs staying in to chip potential blitzers which put fewer receivers in the pattern and not as far down field. So if you don't telegraph you are only sending 3 it might work sometimes. But if you only rush 3 and the other 8 are clearly in coverage that is a prevent defense and easily exploited as we have seen over and over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, onmyown said:

Defense has steadily gotten better as the year has gone on, from almost last to right in the middle. This is a great sign and is to be expected. Looks a lot like what Rhule has done wherever he has gone.

If the Oline is built properly for the next franchise QB...we can be competitive. 
 

Unfortunatley Hurney is in charge of that.

The defense has gotten better in what regard?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

I would dispute the statement "steadily gotten better" statistically. It's actually been pretty up and down most of the year. But, you would expect that with a young defense.

I wouldn't say "steadily gotten better". They've been up and down all year.

The big debate everybody's having now is whether you blame it on the personnel or the coaching. In reality it's both, but who's more to blame?

My answer: I don't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

I wouldn't say "steadily gotten better". They've been up and down all year.

The big debate everybody's having now is whether you blame it on the personnel or the coaching. In reality it's both, but who's more to blame?

My answer: I don't know.

Yeah, that is a level of detail that none of us has invested the time into knowing and probably very few of us have the football acumen to discern. 

I know the 4 Man Rush guys(who have the best Panthers content around) have been on the personnel more than the defensive coaching. They've been kind of on Joe Brady somewhat though for some of his playcalling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, that is a level of detail that none of us has invested the time into knowing and probably very few of us have the football acumen to discern. 

I know the 4 Man Rush guys(who have the best Panthers content around) have been on the personnel more than the defensive coaching. They've been kind of on Joe Brady somewhat though for some of his playcalling.

Our buddy Ellis works with them sometimes I think.

From what I've seen, their content is pretty good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Our buddy Ellis works with them sometimes I think.

From what I've seen, their content is pretty good.

They need a lot of polish and some better equipment but, IMO, their actual content is leaps and bounds better than anything else being done. Highly recommend their podcast, their Youtube post game talks, and their All-22 film room sessions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, WarPanthers89 said:

It’s almost like we have the youngest  starting defense in a decade 


  I really think we are questioning why the driver's ed class students are not winning at Daytona.  You can hide 1 or 2 weak players/rookies, but 4-5?  We have a lot of growing to do.  Is this part of that process?  I hope so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...