-
Welcome!
Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!
Or simply create a new Huddle account.
Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!
.thumb.gif.f35aad759896324c3e174efcba5a66a6.gif)
-
-
-
-
Topics
-
-
-
-
Posts
-
Irony yes you could say that as long as there is no intent to claim that because he left we all of a sudden got so bad we are losing all the time. Which it seems like you might be trying to imply. Did we lose something? Yes we did. Was it worth 5 years at 28 mil per? Not to my thinking. -
(1).thumb.jpg.39d47488da35eba0b4aca548ded58784.jpg)
By LinvilleGorge · Posted
https://www.facebook.com/MEMES.of.the.NFL/videos/779983564773360/ LOL -
First: What do you think the word ‘scapegoating’ means? Because what I said was not scapegoating. They are two different players playing two different roles. I simply said two things about Burns, if I recall. One, basically he is a one dimensional player that is doing well because they have a very strong front in NY. Two, I was against paying his price because he is a liability against the run. One dimensional and therefore not worth it. Summing it up: he e is a pass rush specialist, about all I have ever felt about him, and his financial demands made him much less of a value. IMO.
-
-
.thumb.JPG.bd4130b85f61683f8be1be1422df8162.JPG)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.